Chapter published in:
Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation
Edited by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francœur, John Humbley and Aurélie Picton
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 18] 2017
► pp. 57–80

Diastratic variation in language for specific purposes

Observations from the analysis of two corpora

| | TIM-FTI, Université de Genève
| | CRTT, Université Lyon 2
In this chapter, we examine the possibility of analyzing diastratic variation in the context of specialized discourse. In order to do so, we first show that diastratic variation is still in need of a clear definition when applied to specialized languages. We then present the results obtained from the analysis of two specialized corpora. The first corpus, in the field of nuclear medicine, contains articles written by experts as well as extracts from machine operator forums. The second corpus is based on texts, documents and websites produced for academic staff in the field of higher education. The information drawn from these corpora shows that diastratic variation does indeed occur within a given field of professional activity, and should be better taken into account by terminologists.
Keywords: diastratic variation, corpora, experts, groups of experts
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.03pic
References

References

Achard-Bayle, Guy, and Michelle Lecolle
(eds) 2009 Sentiments linguistiques et discours spontanés sur le lexique. Metz: Université Paul Verlaine.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2005 “AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.” In Professional Communication Conference, 2005 (IPCC 2005), 729–737.Google Scholar
Antia, Bassey Edem
2007 Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auger, Pierre
2001 “Essai d’élaboration d’un modèle terminologique/terminographique variationniste.” TradTerm 7: 183–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline
2003 “Le fait autonymique: langage, langue, discours: quelques repères.” In Parler des mots. Le fait autonymique en discours, ed. by Jacqueline Authier-Revuz, Marianne Doury, and Sandrine Reboul-Touré, 67–95. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar
Bloom, Benjamin S.
1968 “Learning for Mastery.” Evaluation Comment 1 (2): 112.Google Scholar
Cabré, Maria Teresa
1998 La terminologie: théories, méthodes et applications. Ottawa, Paris: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa/Armand Colin.Google Scholar
2000 “Terminologie et linguistique: la théorie des portes.” Terminologies nouvelles 21: 10–15.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1969 Einführung in die Strukturelle Linguistik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
De Ketele, Jean-Marie
2010 “La pédagogie universitaire: un courant en plein développement.” Revue française de pédagogie 172: 5–13.Google Scholar
Desmet, Isabel
2007 “Terminologie, culture et société. Éléments pour une théorie variationniste de la terminologie et des langues de spécialité.” Cahiers du Rifal 26: 3–13.Google Scholar
Drouin, Patrick
2003 “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology 9 (1): 99–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freixa, Judit
2002 Anàlisi de la variació denomitiva en textos de different grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. PhD Thesis. Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona.Google Scholar
2006 “Causes of Denominative Variation in Terminology. A typology proposal.” Terminology 12 (1): 51–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gadet, Françoise
2003a La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2003b “La variation.” In Le grand livre de la langue française, ed. by Marina Yaguello, 91–152. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gaudin, François
1993 “Pour une socioterminologie. Des problèmes sémantiques aux pratiques institutionnelles.” In Publications de l’Université de Rouen, 182, Rouen: Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
2005 “La socioterminologie.” Langages 157: 80–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guespin, Louis
1993 “Normaliser ou standardiser?” Le langage et l’homme XXVIII (4): 213–222.Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael
1988 “La pédagogie de maîtrise: idées-forces, analyses, bilans.” In Assurer la réussite des apprentissages scolaires. Les propositions de la pédagogie de maîtrise, ed. by Michael Huberman, 12–44. Lausanne: Delachaux and Niestlé.Google Scholar
Humbley, John
1996 “La légitimation en terminologie.” Sémiotiques 11: 119–136.Google Scholar
Kacprzak, Alicja, and Jean-Pierre Goudaillier
2014 “Dénominations des maladies en langue populaire et argotique (de la ‘synonymite’ des noms de maladies).” e-Scriptat Romanica 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966 The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington [DC]: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ledegen, Gudrun, and Isabelle Léglise
2013 “Variations et changements linguistiques.” In Sociolinguistique du contact. Dictionnaire des termes et concepts, ed. by Jacky Simonin, and Sylvie Wharton, 315–329. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Moreau, Marie-Louise
(ed) 1997 Sociolinguistique. Concepts de base. Sprimont: Éditions Mardaga.Google Scholar
Péraldi, Sandrine
2011 Indétermination terminologique et multidimensionnalité dans le domaine de la chimie organique : analyse à partir d’un corpus spécialisé de langue anglaise. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Perrenoud, Philippe
2008 Des intentions à l’action. Paris: ESF éditeur.Google Scholar
Picton, Aurélie, and Pascaline Dury
2015 “Les discours d’expertise en langues de spécialité: le point de vue du terminologue.” In Écritures expertes en questions, ed. by Céline Beaudet, and Véronique Rey, 265–278. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
2006 “Précis de Literal Meaning .” Philosophiques 33 (1): 231–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Penagos, Carlos
2004 Metalinguistic Information Extraction from Specialized Texts to Enrich Computational Lexicons. Thèse de doctorat. Université Pompeu Fabra, Barcelone.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Fernández-Silva, Sabela
2019. The Cognitive and Communicative Functions of Term Variation in Research Articles: A Comparative Study in Psychology and Geology. Applied Linguistics 40:4 ► pp. 624 ff. Crossref logo
Maier, Carmen Daniela & Jan Engberg
2019.  In Science Communication on the Internet [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 308], ► pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Vezzani, Federica & Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
2020. Methodology for the standardization of terminological resources. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 26:2 ► pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.