Cover not available
Part of
Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation
Edited by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francœur, John Humbley and Aurélie Picton
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 18] 2017
► pp. 57–79

Chapter 3
Diastratic variation in language for specific purposes

Observations from the analysis of two corpora

| FTI-TIM, Université de Genève | TIM-FTI, Université de Genève
| CRTT, Université Lyon 2 | CRTT, Université Lyon 2
In this chapter, we examine the possibility of analyzing diastratic variation in the context of specialized discourse. In order to do so, we first show that diastratic variation is still in need of a clear definition when applied to specialized languages. We then present the results obtained from the analysis of two specialized corpora. The first corpus, in the field of nuclear medicine, contains articles written by experts as well as extracts from machine operator forums. The second corpus is based on texts, documents and websites produced for academic staff in the field of higher education. The information drawn from these corpora shows that diastratic variation does indeed occur within a given field of professional activity, and should be better taken into account by terminologists.
Keywords: diastratic variation, corpora, experts, groups of experts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Issues and objectives
  • 3.Methodological considerations
    • 3.1The fields of study and the “communities” of experts chosen
    • 3.2Corpus
    • 3.3Methodology
  • 4.Corpus exploration and results
    • 4.1The nuclear medicine corpus
      • 4.1.1Apocopes
      • 4.1.2Phraseologisms
      • 4.1.3Different terminologies
    • 4.2The university pedagogy corpus
      • 4.2.1Practitioner-experts: Shared but selected and operationalized terminology
      • 4.2.2Terminology of expert-researchers: A need for reflexivity and a certain indetermination
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.03pic
References (31)
References
Achard-Bayle, Guy, and Michelle Lecolle (eds). 2009. Sentiments linguistiques et discours spontanés sur le lexique. Metz: Université Paul Verlaine.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2005. “AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.” In Professional Communication Conference, 2005 (IPCC 2005), 729–737.Google Scholar
Antia, Bassey Edem. 2007. Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auger, Pierre. 2001. “Essai d’élaboration d’un modèle terminologique/terminographique variationniste.” TradTerm 7: 183–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline. 2003. “Le fait autonymique: langage, langue, discours: quelques repères.” In Parler des mots. Le fait autonymique en discours, ed. by Jacqueline Authier-Revuz, Marianne Doury, and Sandrine Reboul-Touré, 67–95. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar
Bloom, Benjamin S. 1968. “Learning for Mastery.” Evaluation Comment 1 (2): 112.Google Scholar
Cabré, Maria Teresa. 1998. La terminologie: théories, méthodes et applications. Ottawa, Paris: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa/Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Terminologie et linguistique: la théorie des portes.” Terminologies nouvelles 21: 10–15.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1969. Einführung in die Strukturelle Linguistik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
De Ketele, Jean-Marie. 2010. “La pédagogie universitaire: un courant en plein développement.” Revue française de pédagogie 172: 5–13.Google Scholar
Desmet, Isabel. 2007. “Terminologie, culture et société. Éléments pour une théorie variationniste de la terminologie et des langues de spécialité.” Cahiers du Rifal 26: 3–13.Google Scholar
Drouin, Patrick. 2003. “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology 9 (1): 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freixa, Judit. 2002. Anàlisi de la variació denomitiva en textos de different grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. PhD Thesis. Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Causes of Denominative Variation in Terminology. A typology proposal.” Terminology 12 (1): 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 2003a. La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “La variation.” In Le grand livre de la langue française, ed. by Marina Yaguello, 91–152. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gaudin, François. 1993. “Pour une socioterminologie. Des problèmes sémantiques aux pratiques institutionnelles.” In Publications de l’Université de Rouen, 182, Rouen: Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
. 2005. “La socioterminologie.” Langages 157: 80–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guespin, Louis. 1993. “Normaliser ou standardiser?” Le langage et l’homme XXVIII (4): 213–222.Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael. 1988. “La pédagogie de maîtrise: idées-forces, analyses, bilans.” In Assurer la réussite des apprentissages scolaires. Les propositions de la pédagogie de maîtrise, ed. by Michael Huberman, 12–44. Lausanne: Delachaux and Niestlé.Google Scholar
Humbley, John. 1996. “La légitimation en terminologie.” Sémiotiques 11: 119–136.Google Scholar
Kacprzak, Alicja, and Jean-Pierre Goudaillier. 2014. “Dénominations des maladies en langue populaire et argotique (de la ‘synonymite’ des noms de maladies).” e-Scriptat Romanica 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington [DC]: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ledegen, Gudrun, and Isabelle Léglise. 2013. “Variations et changements linguistiques.” In Sociolinguistique du contact. Dictionnaire des termes et concepts, ed. by Jacky Simonin, and Sylvie Wharton, 315–329. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Moreau, Marie-Louise (ed). 1997. Sociolinguistique. Concepts de base. Sprimont: Éditions Mardaga.Google Scholar
Péraldi, Sandrine. 2011. Indétermination terminologique et multidimensionnalité dans le domaine de la chimie organique : analyse à partir d’un corpus spécialisé de langue anglaise. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Perrenoud, Philippe. 2008. Des intentions à l’action. Paris: ESF éditeur.Google Scholar
Picton, Aurélie, and Pascaline Dury. 2015. “Les discours d’expertise en langues de spécialité: le point de vue du terminologue.” In Écritures expertes en questions, ed. by Céline Beaudet, and Véronique Rey, 265–278. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2006. “Précis de Literal Meaning .” Philosophiques 33 (1): 231–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Penagos, Carlos. 2004. Metalinguistic Information Extraction from Specialized Texts to Enrich Computational Lexicons. Thèse de doctorat. Université Pompeu Fabra, Barcelone.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Delavigne, Valérie
2023. Des corpus aux bases de données… et retour. Quelle architecture pour une base de données socioterminologiques?. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38:Supplement_1 ► pp. i30 ff. DOI logo
González Granado, Nicolás, Patrick Drouin & Aurélie Picton
2023. De l’analyse statistique à l’apprentissage automatique : le langage R au service de la terminologie. Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée N° 208:4 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Delavigne, Valérie, Aurélie Picton, Emma Thibert, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Socioterminologie et terminologie textuelle: l’expertise en questions. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 04012 ff. DOI logo
Engberg, Jan
2022. LSP and Transdiscursive Knowledge Communication. In Specialized Knowledge Mediation, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Joshua
2021. Towards the elaboration of a diastratic model in historical analyses of koineization. Sociolinguistic Studies 14:4 DOI logo
Vezzani, Federica & Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
2020. Methodology for the standardization of terminological resources. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 26:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Silva, Sabela
2019. The Cognitive and Communicative Functions of Term Variation in Research Articles: A Comparative Study in Psychology and Geology. Applied Linguistics 40:4 ► pp. 624 ff. DOI logo
Maier, Carmen Daniela & Jan Engberg
2019. Chapter 7. The multimodal bridge between academics and practitioners in the Harvard Business Review’s digital context. In Science Communication on the Internet [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 308], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.