Cover not available
Part of
Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation
Edited by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francœur, John Humbley and Aurélie Picton
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 18] 2017
► pp. 155–180

Chapter 7
Terminological variation and the unsaturability of concepts

| Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada | Universitat Pompeu Fabra
| Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje | Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Concepts cannot be saturated; this chapter aims to explore the reasons why the substance of a concept is unlimited. Textual analysis shows that the number of terminological variants used to refer to a concept seem endless. The origin of this diversity can be found in the different perceptions held by specialists, in the variety of text types in which a specialised topic is approached, in the expressive needs of the author, in the different origins and intentions of these authors, or in the different communicative situations where knowledge is developed. However, it is equally interesting to observe how the same concept, without leaving traces in different denominations, acquires a great range of nuances in the different contexts where it appears.
Keywords: denominative variation, conceptual variation, conceptual structuring, term motivation, saturation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The concept of saturation in linguistics
  • 3.Unsaturability, concept and variation
    • 3.1The definition of concept
    • 3.2The definition of variation
  • 4.Conceptual variation
    • 4.1Conceptual variation not reflected in denominations
    • 4.2Conceptual variation reflected in denominations
      • 4.2.1Conceptual imprecision
      • 4.2.2Differences in conceptualisation (multidimensionality, perspective, point of view, motivation)
  • 5.Causes and examples of concept unsaturability
    • 5.1Variation as adaptation to audience
    • 5.2Variation as a cognitive mechanism
    • 5.3Variation as a rhetorical device
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.07fre
References (66)
References
Adelstein, Andreina. 2007. Unidad léxica y significado especializado: modelo de representación a partir del nombre relacional madre. Tesis doctoral. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2003. “Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18 (5–6): 513–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boisson, Claude. 2001. “Dénomination et ‘visionʼ.” Linguistique de la dénomination. Cahiers de praxématique 36: 141–168.Google Scholar
Bouveret, Myriam, and François Gaudin. 1997. “Du flou dans les catégorisations: le cas de la bioinformatique.” In Terminologie et interdisciplinarité, actes des Troisièmes journées internationales de terminologie, Bruxelles 31 mai-1er juin 1996, ed. by Caroline De Schatzen, 63–72. Peeters: Louvain la Neuve.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne, and Shane Hawkins. 2006. “Variation in the Organization of Medical Terms: Exploring some Motivations for Term Choice.” Terminology 12 (1): 79–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Maria Teresa. 2008. “El principio de poliedricidad: la articulación de lo discursivo, lo cognitivo y lo lingüístico en Terminología (I).” IBÉRICA 16: 9–36.Google Scholar
Cassany, Daniel, and Jaume Martí. 1998. “Estrategias divulgativas del concepto prión.” Quark 12: 56–66.Google Scholar
Ciapuscio, Elena Guiomar. 2003. Textos especializados y terminología. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Condamines, Anne, and Josette Rebeyrolle. 1997. “Point de vue en langue spécialisée.” Meta 42 (1): 174–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbeil, Jean-Claude. 1988. “Les terminologies devant Babel.” Actes du Colloque Terminologie et Technologies nouvelles . La Défense, du 9 au 11 décembre 1985. Québec: OLF, 49–62.
Cruse, Alan. 1995. “Polysemy and Related Phenomena”. In Computational Lexical Semantics, ed. by Patrick Saint-Dizier, and Evelyn Viegas, 33–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancette, Jeanne. 2005. “Questions de conception ou de conceptualisation? Du texte à la carte conceptuelle en traduction.” Le Langage et l’Homme 40 (1): 107–122.Google Scholar
Dury, Pascaline, and Susanne Lervad. 2008. “La variation synonymique dans la terminologie de l’énergie: approches synchronique et diachronique, deux études de cas.” LSP and Professional Communication, 8 (2). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela (ed). 2012. A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Silvia Montero Martínez, María Rosa Castro Prieto, José Senso Ruiz, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, Pilar León-Araúz, and Miguel Vega Expósito. 2006. Process-oriented Terminology Management in the Domain of Coastal Engineering. Terminology 12 (2): 189–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and Pilar León-Araúz. 2014. “Specialized Knowledge Dynamics: From Cognition to Culture-bound Terminology.” In Dynamics and Terminology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Monolingual and Multilingual Culture-bound Communication, ed. by Rita Temmerman, and Marc Van Campenhoudt, 135–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Juan Verdejo, Pilar León, Arianne Reimerink, and Gloria Guzmán. 2014. “Neural Substrates of Specialized Knowledge Representation: An fMRI Study.” Revue française de linguistique appliquée 19 (1):15–32.Google Scholar
Felber, Helmut. 1981. “The Vienna School of Terminology, Fundamentals and its Theory.” INFOTERM (1981): 69–86.Google Scholar
Fernández-Silva, Sabela. 2013a. “Variación denominativa y punto de vista.” Revista Debate Terminológico 9: 11–37.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “La influencia del área disciplinar en la variación terminológica: Un estudio en un corpus interdisciplinario sobre pesca.” Revista Signos 46 (83): 361–388.Google Scholar
Fernández-Silva, Sabela, Judit Freixa, and Maria Teresa Cabré. 2012. “A Cognitive Approach to Synonymy in Translation.” In Cognitive Linguistics between Universality and Variation, ed. by Mario Brdar, Ida Raffaelli, and Milena Žic Fuchs, 189–211. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2014. “A Method for Analysing the Dynamics of Naming from a Monolingual and Multilingual Perspective.” In Dynamics and Terminology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Monolingual and Multilingual Culture-bound Communication, ed. by Rita Temmerman and Marc Van Campenhoudt, 183–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni Di Semantica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freixa, Judit. 2002. La variació terminològica: anàlisi de la variació denominativa en textos de diferent grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Sèrie Tesis, 3). CD-ROM. DL: B-52163-2002; Barcelona: [URL]Google Scholar
. 2006. “Causes of Denominative Variation in Terminology: A Typology Proposal.” Terminology 12 (1): 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Dels graus de sinonímia al contínuum de variació terminològica.” In Estudis de lingüístics i de lingüística aplicada en honor de M. Teresa Cabré Catellví. Vol. II: De deixebles, ed. by Mercè Lorente, Rosa Estopà, Judit Freixa, Jaume Martí, and Carles Tebé, 295–320. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Freixa, Judit, Sabela Fernández-Silva, and Maria Teresa Cabré. 2008. “La multiplicité des chemins dénominatifs.” Meta 53 (4): 731–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, and George Lakoff. 2005. “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3–4): 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, François. 2003. Socioterminologie: une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. Bruxelles: De Boek Duculot.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander K. 1995. “Language and Reshaping of Human Experience.” In The Language of Science, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster, vol. 5, 7–23. London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Lothar. 1979. “Towards a theory of LSP. Elements of a methodology of LSP analysis”. Fachsprache 1 (1/2): 12–17.Google Scholar
ISO 1087-1. 2000. Terminology Work: Vocabulary. Part 1: Theory and Applications. Norme internationale/International Standard. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
ISO 704. 2000. Principes et méthodes de la terminologie – Principles and Methods of Terminology. Norme internationale/International Standard. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Kocourek, Rostislav 1991. La langue française de la technique et de la science: vers une linguistique de la langue savante. Weisbaden: Oscar Brandstetter.Google Scholar
Kostina, Irina. 2011. “Clasificación de la variación conceptual de los términos basada en la modulación semántica discursiva.” Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura 16 (27). Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Kovecses, Zoltan. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lázaro Hernández, Jorge A. In press. “La noción de saturación semántica en terminología.” Debate Terminológico 15.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczy k. Barbara. 2007. “Polysemy, Prototypes and Radial Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 139–169. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude, Benoît Robichaud, and Carlos Subirats Rüggeberg. 2014. “Discovering Frames in Specialized Domains”. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, et al., 1364–1371. Reykjavik: LREC.Google Scholar
Mortureux, Marie-Françoise. 1993. “Paradigmes désignationnels.” Semen 8: 117–136.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2001. Diccionario de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Rogers, Margaret. 2004. Multidimensionality in Concepts Systems: A Bilingual Textual Perspective. Terminology 10 (2): 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rondeau, Guy. 1983. Introduction à la terminologie, 2nd ed. Chicoutimi (Québec): Gaëtan Morin.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Severance, Elizabeth, and Margaret Floy Washburn. 1907. “The Loss of Associative Power in Words after Long Fixation.” The American Journal of Psychology 18 (2): 182–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tebé, Carles. 2005. La representació conceptual en terminologia. l’atribució temàtica en els bancs de dades terminològiques. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada.Google Scholar
Temmerman, Rita. 2000. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Rita, and Marc Van Campenhoudt. 2014. “Introduction.” In Dynamics and Terminology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Monolingual and Multilingual Culture-bound Communication, ed. by Rita Temmerman, and Marc Van Campenhoudt, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tercedor, Maribel. 2011. “The Cognitive Dynamics of Terminological Variation.” Terminology 17 (2): 181–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teso, Enrique del. 2003. “Contexto, variación conceptual y valores semánticos.” Moenia 9: 75–103.Google Scholar
Tuggy, David. 2007. “Schematicity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 82–116. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ureña, José Manuel, and Maribel Tercedor. 2011. “Situated Metaphor in Scientific Discourse: An English-Spanish Contrastive Study.” Languages in Contrast 11 (2): 216–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volanschi, Alexandra, and Natalie Kübler. 2011. “The Impact of Metaphorical Framing on Term Creation in Biology.” Terminology 17 (2): 198–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichter, Sigurd. 1994. Experten-und Laienwortschätze. Umriss einer Lexicologie der Vertikalität. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wüster, Eugen. 1959/60. “Das Worten der Welt, schaubildlich und terminologisch dargestellt.” Sprachforum, III. 183–203. [Traducción catalana: 1996. “La denominació del món representada gràficament i terminològicament”. En M. T. Cabré (dir.) Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona]Google Scholar
. 1979. Introducción a La teoría general de la terminología y a La lexicografía terminológica. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Zawada, Britta E., and Piet H. Swanepoel. 1994. “On the Empirical Inadequacy of Terminological Concept Theories: A Case for Prototype Theory.” Terminology 1 (2): 253–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Vezzani, Federica & Rute Costa
2024. Variation in psychopathological terminology. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 30:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Benítez Carrasco, Valeria & Pilar León-Araúz
2023. Denominative variation in the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset corpus. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Biel, Łucja
2023. Variation of legal terms in monolingual and multilingual contexts. In Handbook of Terminology [Handbook of Terminology, 3], ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Humbert-Droz, Julie, Aurélie Picton, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Du Higgs à la particule de Dieu : une analyse de la variation terminologique dans un contexte de déterminologisation. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 04005 ff. DOI logo
San Martín, Antonio
2022. A Flexible Approach to Terminological Definitions: Representing Thematic Variation. International Journal of Lexicography 35:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
San Martín, Antonio
2022. Contextual Constraints in Terminological Definitions. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Villena Araya, Belén & Sabela Fernandez-Silva
2021. Noun Composition in Mapudungun: Conceptual Patterns in the Naming of Places. Íkala 26:2 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Silva, Sabela
2019. The Cognitive and Communicative Functions of Term Variation in Research Articles: A Comparative Study in Psychology and Geology. Applied Linguistics 40:4 ► pp. 624 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.