Article published in:
Translation as a cognitive activity
Edited by Fabio Alves, Amparo Hurtado Albir and Isabel Lacruz
[Translation Spaces 4:1] 2015
► pp. 145–169

Translating and Post-Editing in the Chinese-Portuguese Language Pair

Insights from an Exploratory Study of Key Logging and Eye Tracking

Published online: 22 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.4.1.07sil
References

References

Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Vale
2009 “Probing the Unit of Translation in Time: Aspects of the Design and Development of a Web Application for Storing, Annotating, and Querying Translation Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 251–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
AuTema-PostEd Group
2013 “Post-Editing and Translating in the Chinese-Portuguese Language Pair: Preliminary Results of an Eye-Tracking and Keylogging Study.” Oral Communication at XI Congresso Internacional da ABRAPT e V Congresso Internacional de Tradutores . Florianópolis, September 23–26.
Balling, Laura, and Michael Carl
2014 “Production Time Across Language and Tasks: A Large-Scale Analysis Using the CRITT Translation Process Database.” In The Development of Translation Competence: Theories and Methodologies from Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Science, edited by John Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 239–268. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steven Walker
2014 “lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4.” R package version 3.1.2. Available at http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lme4.Google Scholar
Carl, Michael
2012a “The CRITT TPR-DB 1.0: A Database for Empirical Human Translation Process Research.” In Proceedings of the AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice (WTPT 2012), edited by Sharon O’Brien, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia, 9–18. Stroudsburg: Association for Machine Translation in the Americas.Google Scholar
2012b “Translog-II: A Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Reading and Writing Research.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation , 4108–4122. Istanbul: European Language Resources Association.
Carl, Michael, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
2009 “Towards Statistical Modelling of Translator’s Activity Data.” International Journal of Speech Technology 12 (4): 125–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carl, Michael, Barbara Dragsted, Jakob Elming, Daniel Hardt, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
2011 “The Process of Post-Editing: A Pilot Study.” Copenhagen Studies in Language 41: 131–142.Google Scholar
Castilho, Sheila, Sharon O’Brien, Fabio Alves, and Morgan O’Brien
2014 “Does Post-Editing Increase Usability? A Study with Brazilian Portuguese as Target Language.” In Proceedings of European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT 2014) , 17–19. Dubrovnic: EAMT.
De Almeida, Giselle
2013 Translating the Post-Editor: An Investigation of Post-Editing Changes and Correlations with Professional Experience Across Two Romance Languages. Ph.D. Thesis. Dublin: School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies.Google Scholar
Doherty, Stephen
2012 Investigating the Effects of Controlled Language on the Reading and Comprehension of Machine-Translated Texts: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Ph.D. Thesis. Dublin: School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies.Google Scholar
Doherty, Stephen, and Sharon O’Brien
2014 “Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translation Output: A User-Centered Study Using Eye-tracking.” Human-Computer Interaction 30: 40–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Stephen, Sharon O’Brien, and Michael Carl
2010 “Eye-tracking as an MT Evaluation Technique.” Machine Translation 24 (1): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elming, Jakob, Laura Winther Balling, and Michael Carl
2014 “Investigating User Behaviour in Post-Editing and Translation using the CASMACAT Workbench.” In Post-editing of Machine Translation, edited by Sharon O’Brien, Laura Winther Balling, Michael Carl, Michael Simard, and Lucia Specia. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hutchins, John
2006  Machine Translation: History of Research and Use . In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, volume 7, edited by Keith Brown, 375–383. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hvelplund, Kristian T.
2011 Allocation of Cognitive Resources in Translation: An Eye-Tracking and Keylogging Study. Ph.D. Thesis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Krings, Hans P.
2001 Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Translated by Geoffrey S. Koby, Gregory M. Shreve, Katja Mischerikow, and Sarah Litzer. Kent: The Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Lacruz, Isabel, Gregory M. Shreve, and Erik Angelone
2012 “Average Pause Ratio as an Indicator of Cognitive Effort in Post-Editing: A Case Study.” AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice (WPTP 2012) , 21–30.
Li, Xingjian
(ed.) 2010 现代汉语规范词典 [Modern Standard Chinese Dictionary]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Mesa Lao, Bartolomé
2014 “Gaze Behaviour on Source Texts: An Exploratory Study Comparing Translation and Post-Editing.” In Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications, edited by Sharon O’Brien, Laura Winther Balling, Michael Carl, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon
2006 Machine-Translatability and Post-Editing Effort: An Empirical Study Using Translog and Choice Network Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. Dublin: School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies.Google Scholar
2011 “Towards Predicting Post-Editing Productivity.” Machine Translation 25: 197–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon, Laura Winther Balling, Michael Carl, Michael Simard, and Lucia Specia
(eds) 2014 Post-Editing of Machine Translation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Publishing Scholars.Google Scholar
Sander, Babett
1990 Untersuchung zur Postedition maschinell übersetzter Texte, Sprachrichtung Deutsch-Englisch. Hildesheim: Unpublished Diplom Thesis, University of Hildesheim, Institut für Angewandte Sprachwissenschaff.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Moritz, and Michael Carl
2013 “The CRITT Translation Process Research Database V1.4”. Unpublished manuscript, Copenhagen Business School. Accessed July 28, 2015. http://​bridge​.cbs​.dk​/resources​/tpr​-db​/TPR​-DB1​.4​.pdf.
Specia, Lucia
2011 “Exploiting Objective Annotations for Measuring Translation Post-Editing Effort.” In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT 2011), edited by M. Forcada, H. Depraetere, and V. Vandeghinste, 73–80.Google Scholar
Specia, Lucia, Marco Turchi, Nicola Cancedda, Marc Dymetman, and Nello Cristianini
2009 “Estimating the Sentence-Level Quality of Machine Translation Systems.” Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT 2009) , 28–37.
TAUS
2010 Postediting in Practice. A TAUS Report. De Rijp: TAUS B. V.Google Scholar
Tian, Liang, Derek F. Wong, and Lidia S. Chao
2011 “Word Alignment Using GIZA++ on Windows.” Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit XIII 2011. 369–372.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
2005 “Uncertainties in Translation Processes.” In Tapping and Mapping the Process of Translation and Interpreting, edited by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit and Riita Jääskeläinen, 123–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Derek F., and Lidia S. Chao
2010 “PCT: Portuguese-Chinese Machine Translation Systems.” Journal of Translation Studies 13 (1-2): 181–196.Google Scholar
Zeng, Xiaodong, Derek F. Wong, Lidia S. Chao, and Isabel Trancoso
2013 “Graph-based Semi-Supervised Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Part-of-Speech Tagging.” In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Sofia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 770–779.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lourenço da Silva, Igor A., Fabio Alves, Marcia Schmaltz, Adriana Pagano, Derek Wong, Lidia Chao, Ana Luísa V. Leal, Paulo Quaresma, Caio Garcia & Gabriel Eduardo da Silva
2017.  In Translation in Transition [Benjamins Translation Library, 133], ► pp. 108 ff. Crossref logo
Moorkens, Joss, Sharon O’Brien, Igor A. L. da Silva, Norma B. de Lima Fonseca & Fabio Alves
2015. Correlations of perceived post-editing effort with measurements of actual effort. Machine Translation 29:3-4 ► pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.