Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive space: Exploring the situational interface
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow and Birgitta Englund Dimitrova
[Translation Spaces 5:1] 2016
► pp. 59–77

Text creation in a multilingual institutional setting

The translator as part of a cooperative system

| University of Antwerp
Text creation is influenced by situational factors, like the context in which the text is written. In a multilingual institution, the context is especially important, because it is controlled by rules and guidelines. This paper presents a case study conducted in the European Commission and the Directorate General for Translation. The text creation and translation process were reconstructed starting from the published version in the Official Journal of the European Union back to the initial idea. The paper focuses on the impact that external processes have on internal processes. We found that text editing and translation go hand in hand and that translators are part of a cooperative system in which their input is of importance for the source text. Moreover, the impact of the institution is significant, since it determines not only the work processes, but also the linguistic form, technical medium and technical content.
Keywords: readability, situational factors, cognitive processes, translator's role, institutional translation, text production, text creation
Published online: 1 January 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.5.1.04van
References (26)
Bendegard, Saga. 2014. Begriplig EU-svenska? Klarspråksarbetets förutsättningar inom den interinstitutionella översättningsprocessen. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Breedveld, Hella. 2002. “Writing and Revising Processes in Professional Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 3 (1): 91–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dam-Jensen, Helle, and Carmen Heine. 2013. “Writing and Translation Process Research: Bridging the Gap.” Journal of Writing Research 5 (1): 89–101. Accessed January 15, 2016.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drewer, Petra, and Wolfgang Ziegler. 2011. Technische Dokumentation. Übersetzungsgerechte Texterstellung und Content-Management. Würzburg: Vogel.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997. Legislative Drafting. A Commission Manual. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
. 2011a. How to Write Clearly. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Duidelijk Schrijven. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
. 2015a. English Style Guide. A Handbook for Authors and Translators in the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Frequently Asked Questions about DG Translation. Accessed October 20, 2015. [URL].Google Scholar
. 2015c. The European Commission’s In-house Translation Service. Accessed October 20, 2015. [URL].Google Scholar
Hendrickx, Karl and Karen Deschamps. 2013. Juridisch Nederlands. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Kang, Ji-Hai. 1998. “Institutional Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker, and Kirsten Malmkjær, 141–145. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koskinen, Kaisa. 2000. “Institutional Illusions. Translating in the EU Commission.” The Translator 6 (1): 49–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Translating Institutions. An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Institutional Translation: The Art of Government by Translation.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 22 (4): 479–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mossop, Brian. 1990. ”Translating Institutions and ‘Idiomatic’ Translation.” Meta 35 (2): 342–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union. 2010.11.18. “Commission regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 of 12 November 2010 on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances”. Accessed March 9, 2016. [URL].
Pym, Anthony. 1995. ”European Translation Studies, Une science qui dérange, and Why Equivalence Needn’t Be a Dirty Word.” TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction 8 (1): 153–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. On Translator Ethics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Klaus. 2007. Wissen, Sprache, Medium, Arbeit. Ein integratives Modell der ein- und mehrsprachigen Fachkommunikation [Knowledge, Language, Medium, Production. An integrative model of monolingual and multilingual specialized discourse communication] (Forum für Fachsprachenforschung 76). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Scott, William Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Suojanen, Tytti, Kaisa Koskinen, and Tiina Tuominen. 2015. Translation Practices Explained: User-centered Translation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van de Geuchte, Sofie. 2011. Tekstgenese, Tekstredactie en Vertalen in een Institutioneel Kader. Casestudy: Europese Commissie. Master’s dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Van Vaerenbergh, Leona, and Klaus Schubert. 2010. “Options and Requirements. A Study of the External Process of Specialized Document Production.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 441: 9–24.Google Scholar
Wagner, Emma, Svend Bech, and Jesús M. Martínez. 2002. Translating for the European Union Institutions. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar