Many languages have general or “light” verbs used by speakers to describe a wide range of situations owing to their relatively schematic meanings, e.g., the English verb do that can be used to describe many different kinds of actions, or the verb put that labels a range of types of placement of objects at locations. Such semantically bleached verbs often become grammaticalized and used to encode an extended (set of) meaning(s), e.g., Tamil veyyii ‘put/place’ is used to encode causative meaning in periphrastic causatives (e.g., okkara veyyii ‘make sit’, nikka veyyii ‘make stand’). But do general verbs in different languages have the same kinds of (schematic) meanings and extensional ranges? Or do they reveal different, perhaps even cross-cutting, ways of structuring the same semantic domain in different languages? These questions require detailed crosslinguistic investigation using comparable methods of eliciting data. The present study is a first step in this direction, and focuses on the use of general verbs to describe events of placement and removal in two South Asian languages, Hindi and Tamil.
Klippel, Alexander, Thora Tenbrink & Daniel R. Montello
2012. 6 The role of structure and function in the conceptualization of direction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 102 ff.
Lander, Yury, Timur Maisak & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2012. 4 Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 67 ff.
Nikanne, Urpo & Emile Van Der Zee
2012. 11 The lexical representation of path curvature in motion expressions: a three‐way path curvature distinction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 187 ff.
Pajusalu, Renate, Neeme Kahusk, Heili Orav, Ann Veismann, Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim
2012. 3 The encoding of motion events in Estonian. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 44 ff.
Schmidtke, Hedda R.
2012. 10 Path and place: the lexical specification of granular compatibility. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 166 ff.
Staden, Miriam van & Bhuvana Narasimhan
2012. 8 Granularity in the cross‐linguistic encoding of motion and location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 134 ff.
Tutton, Mark
2012. 9 Granularity, space, and motion‐framed location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 149 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.