Relative Clauses in Time and Space
A case study in the methods of diachronic typology
This book presents a comprehensive survey of historically attested relative clause constructions from a diachronic typological perspective. Systematic integration of historical data and a typological approach demonstrates how typology and historical linguistics can each benefit from attention to the other. The diachronic behaviour of relative clauses is mapped across a broad range of genetically and geographically diverse languages. Central to the discussion is the strength of evidence for what have previously been claimed to be ‘natural’ or even ‘universal’ pathways of change. While many features of relative clause constructions are found to be remarkably stable over long periods of time, it is shown that language contact seems to be the crucial factor that does trigger change when it occurs. These results point to the importance of incorporating the effects of language contact into models of language change rather than viewing contact situations as exceptional. The findings of this study have implications for the definition of relative clauses, their syntactic structures and the relationships between the different ‘subtypes’ of this construction, as well as offering new directions for the integration of typological and historical linguistic research.
[Typological Studies in Language, 101] 2012. xii, 281 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 25 June 2012
Published online on 25 June 2012
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. ix
-
List of abbreviations | pp. xi–xii
-
1. Introduction | pp. 1–42
-
2. Sources and extension of grammatical markers | pp. 43–132
-
3. Other types of relationship between grammatical markers | pp. 133–162
-
4. Syntactic change in the development of RC constructions | pp. 163–198
-
5. Relevant factors in language change: The importance of contact | pp. 199–228
-
6. Conclusions | pp. 229–246
-
-
Appendices | pp. 263–274
-
Language index | pp. 275–278
-
Subject index | pp. 279–281
“It is well written and clear; the survey of the field is excellent; the evidence is abundant and is used well; the argumentation is clear and persuasive; and the findings make very significant original contributions to a broad and complex topic. This book will no doubt stand as the most significant study of the history of relative clauses for many years to come, by far the most definitive work in this area to date.”
Lyle Campbell
“This book will be regarded as a pioneering work in the area of diachronic syntactic typology.”
Cynthia Allen
“This book provides a model of what kind of research is possible in the diachronic typology of syntax.”
Harold Koch
“The book is written very well and its literature review is thorough and proceeds in a step by step fashion. The main points are explained by presenting appropriate data alongside the analysis. The book mainly discusses diachronic typology based on a collection of synchronic typological works, which allows the author to check the historical change and development in relative clause constructions. The scope of the book covers many language families worldwide. It examines relative markers, types of relatives and the similarities and differences between different relative markers in the same language based on the available synchronic work on that language. It unfolds the complex process of change and development in complex sentence constructions in a language. The author deserves much credit for her vast, thorough literature review, which considers linguists’ claims, and for formulating generalizations based on data available from previous literature that is extrapolated to the present diachronic work.”
Pratik H. Chikhaliya, University of Hyderabad, on Linguist List 25.1436, 2014
Cited by (31)
Cited by 31 other publications
Hernáiz, Rodrigo
Krajewska, Dorota
Schapper, Antoinette
Ballarè, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
Lee, Wei-Wei & Mathias Jenny
Luk, Ellison & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2022. Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages. Studies in Language 46:3 ► pp. 594 ff.
Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
Jarque, Maria Josep & Esther Pascual
Shirtz, Shahar, Luigi Talamo & Annemarie Verkerk
Auderset, Sandra
Pat‐El, Na'ama
Cahlon, Rammie
Bentein, Klaas & Metİn Bağrıaçık
Gandon, Ophelie
2018. The grammaticalization of interrogative pronouns into relative pronouns in South-Caucasian languages. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 163 ff.
Huehnergard, John & Na‘ama Pat-El
Lai, Yunfan
2018. Relativisation in Wobzi Khroskyabs and the integration of genitivisation. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020. Chapter 4. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 87 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia & Paolo Ramat
Kholodilova, Maria A.
Van de Velde, Mark L. O. & Odette Ambouroue
2017. The origin and use of a relative clause construction that targets objects in Orungu (Bantu, Gabon). Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 615 ff.
Cohen, Eran
2016. The modern Hebrew prepositional relative clause strategy. Studies in Language 40:4 ► pp. 733 ff.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
Pearce, Elizabeth
Lobo-Guerrero, Luis
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2017. Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFF: Historical & comparative linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General