Relative Clauses in Time and Space

A case study in the methods of diachronic typology

Author
Rachel Hendery | The Australian National University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027206824 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027273680 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
Google Play logo
This book presents a comprehensive survey of historically attested relative clause constructions from a diachronic typological perspective. Systematic integration of historical data and a typological approach demonstrates how typology and historical linguistics can each benefit from attention to the other. The diachronic behaviour of relative clauses is mapped across a broad range of genetically and geographically diverse languages. Central to the discussion is the strength of evidence for what have previously been claimed to be ‘natural’ or even ‘universal’ pathways of change. While many features of relative clause constructions are found to be remarkably stable over long periods of time, it is shown that language contact seems to be the crucial factor that does trigger change when it occurs. These results point to the importance of incorporating the effects of language contact into models of language change rather than viewing contact situations as exceptional. The findings of this study have implications for the definition of relative clauses, their syntactic structures and the relationships between the different ‘subtypes’ of this construction, as well as offering new directions for the integration of typological and historical linguistic research.
[Typological Studies in Language, 101] 2012.  xii, 281 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“It is well written and clear; the survey of the field is excellent; the evidence is abundant and is used well; the argumentation is clear and persuasive; and the findings make very significant original contributions to a broad and complex topic. This book will no doubt stand as the most significant study of the history of relative clauses for many years to come, by far the most definitive work in this area to date.”
“This book will be regarded as a pioneering work in the area of diachronic syntactic typology.”
“This book provides a model of what kind of research is possible in the diachronic typology of syntax.”
“The book is written very well and its literature review is thorough and proceeds in a step by step fashion. The main points are explained by presenting appropriate data alongside the analysis. The book mainly discusses diachronic typology based on a collection of synchronic typological works, which allows the author to check the historical change and development in relative clause constructions. The scope of the book covers many language families worldwide. It examines relative markers, types of relatives and the similarities and differences between different relative markers in the same language based on the available synchronic work on that language. It unfolds the complex process of change and development in complex sentence constructions in a language. The author deserves much credit for her vast, thorough literature review, which considers linguists’ claims, and for formulating generalizations based on data available from previous literature that is extrapolated to the present diachronic work.”
Cited by

Cited by 31 other publications

Auderset, Sandra
2020. Interrogatives as relativization markers in Indo-European. Diachronica 37:4  pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Ballarè, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
2022. The development of locative relative markers. Studies in Language 46:1  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Bentein, Klaas & Metİn Bağrıaçık
2018. On The Third Type of Headed Relative Clause in Post‐Classical and Early Byzantine Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3  pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Cahlon, Rammie
2019. The evolution of past-hab in Cuzco Quechua. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3  pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Cinque, Guglielmo
2020. The Syntax of Relative Clauses, DOI logo
Cohen, Eran
2016. The modern Hebrew prepositional relative clause strategy. Studies in Language 40:4  pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia & Paolo Ramat
2017. Typological Approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax,  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Gandon, Ophelie
2018. The grammaticalization of interrogative pronouns into relative pronouns in South-Caucasian languages. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Hernáiz, Rodrigo
2024. Causal clauses as source of sentential complementation: cross-linguistic evidence and methodological issues. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0 DOI logo
Huehnergard, John & Na‘ama Pat-El
2018. The origin of the Semitic relative marker. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 81:2  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Jarque, Maria Josep & Esther Pascual
2021. From gesture- and sign-in-interaction to grammar: Fictive questions for relative clauses in signed languages. Languages and Modalities 1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Kholodilova, Maria A.
2017. Competition Between ‘Who’ and ‘Which’ in Slavic Light-Headed Relative Clauses. Slovene 6:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Krajewska, Dorota
2024. The diachrony of the Basque marker bait-: from a manner expression to subordinator. Linguistics 62:3  pp. 653 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2018. Relativisation in Wobzi Khroskyabs and the integration of genitivisation. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Wei-Wei & Mathias Jenny
2022. Syntactic change in Palaungic. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45:1  pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2016. Complementation in Oceanic: Focus on Complementizers*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:3  pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Lobo-Guerrero, Luis
2014. Life Securitisation, the Event Object of Insurance and the Strategisation of Time. Journal of Cultural Economy 7:3  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Luk, Ellison & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2022. Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages. Studies in Language 46:3  pp. 594 ff. DOI logo
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3  pp. 669 ff. DOI logo
Maschler, Yael
2020. Chapter 4. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2020. Typology and nuance: relativization. Revista da ABRALIN  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pat‐El, Na'ama
2020. Typological Approaches and Historical Linguistics. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Pearce, Elizabeth
2016. Whither Realis marking. Diachronica 33:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Schapper, Antoinette
2023. From possessive to relative clause marker: a grammaticalization pathway in the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:3  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
2022. Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms: an introduction. Folia Linguistica 56:3  pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Shirtz, Shahar, Luigi Talamo & Annemarie Verkerk
2021. The Evolutionary Dynamics of Negative Existentials in Indo-European. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2014. Relative Clauses in Southeast Asian Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2017. Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
SUÁREZ‐GÓMEZ, CRISTINA
2015. Adverbial relative clauses in world Englishes. World Englishes 34:4  pp. 620 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Mark L. O. & Odette Ambouroue

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFF: Historical & comparative linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2012012902 | Marc record