Relative Clauses in Time and Space

A case study in the methods of diachronic typology

| The Australian National University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027206824 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027273680 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
This book presents a comprehensive survey of historically attested relative clause constructions from a diachronic typological perspective. Systematic integration of historical data and a typological approach demonstrates how typology and historical linguistics can each benefit from attention to the other. The diachronic behaviour of relative clauses is mapped across a broad range of genetically and geographically diverse languages. Central to the discussion is the strength of evidence for what have previously been claimed to be ‘natural’ or even ‘universal’ pathways of change. While many features of relative clause constructions are found to be remarkably stable over long periods of time, it is shown that language contact seems to be the crucial factor that does trigger change when it occurs. These results point to the importance of incorporating the effects of language contact into models of language change rather than viewing contact situations as exceptional. The findings of this study have implications for the definition of relative clauses, their syntactic structures and the relationships between the different ‘subtypes’ of this construction, as well as offering new directions for the integration of typological and historical linguistic research.
[Typological Studies in Language, 101]  2012.  xii, 281 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ix
List of abbreviations
xi–xii
1. Introduction
1–42
2. Sources and extension of grammatical markers
43–132
3. Other types of relationship between grammatical markers
133–162
4. Syntactic change in the development of RC constructions
163–198
5. Relevant factors in language change: The importance of contact
199–228
6. Conclusions
229–246
References
247–262
Appendices
263–274
Language index
275–278
Subject index
279–281
“It is well written and clear; the survey of the field is excellent; the evidence is abundant and is used well; the argumentation is clear and persuasive; and the findings make very significant original contributions to a broad and complex topic. This book will no doubt stand as the most significant study of the history of relative clauses for many years to come, by far the most definitive work in this area to date.”
“This book will be regarded as a pioneering work in the area of diachronic syntactic typology.”
“This book provides a model of what kind of research is possible in the diachronic typology of syntax.”
“The book is written very well and its literature review is thorough and proceeds in a step by step fashion. The main points are explained by presenting appropriate data alongside the analysis. The book mainly discusses diachronic typology based on a collection of synchronic typological works, which allows the author to check the historical change and development in relative clause constructions. The scope of the book covers many language families worldwide. It examines relative markers, types of relatives and the similarities and differences between different relative markers in the same language based on the available synchronic work on that language. It unfolds the complex process of change and development in complex sentence constructions in a language. The author deserves much credit for her vast, thorough literature review, which considers linguists’ claims, and for formulating generalizations based on data available from previous literature that is extrapolated to the present diachronic work.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bentein, Klaas & Metİn Bağrıaçık
2018. On The Third Type of Headed Relative Clause in Post-Classical and Early Byzantine Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3  pp. 529 ff. Crossref logo
Cohen, Eran
2016. The modern Hebrew prepositional relative clause strategy. Studies in Language 40:4  pp. 733 ff. Crossref logo
Gandon, Ophelie
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Huehnergard, John & Na‘ama Pat-El
2018. The origin of the Semitic relative marker. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 81:2  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Kholodilova, Maria A.
2017. Competition Between ‘Who’ and ‘Which’ in Slavic Light-Headed Relative Clauses. Slovene 6:1  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Lai, Yunfan
2018. Relativisation in Wobzi Khroskyabs and the integration of genitivisation. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2016. Complementation in Oceanic: Focus on Complementizers*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:3  pp. 451 ff. Crossref logo
Lobo-Guerrero, Luis
2014. Life Securitisation, the Event Object of Insurance and the Strategisation of Time. Journal of Cultural Economy 7:3  pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinate she- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2020.  In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Pearce, Elizabeth
2016. Whither Realis marking: Loss and specialization in an Oceanic language. Diachronica 33:1  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2014. Relative Clauses in Southeast Asian Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42:3  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ, CRISTINA
2015. Adverbial relative clauses in world Englishes. World Englishes 34:4  pp. 620 ff. Crossref logo
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2017. Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes. English World-Wide 38:2  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Van de Velde, Mark L.O. & Odette Ambouroue
2017. The origin and use of a relative clause construction that targets objects in Orungu (Bantu, Gabon). Studies in Language 41:3  pp. 615 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2012012902