This paper introduces a method (the Family Bias Method) that estimates statistical biases in diachronic developments on the basis of synchronic samples. Estimates of developments are sought from their expected synchronic results: if a structure S outnumbers non-S significantly in a family, a change toward S in this family was more likely than a change away from it – either because S was there in the protolanguage and then hardly ever got lost, or because S was not there and then it was was innovated early or often in the family. If structures are balanced in a family, no signal can be inferred: unless we know the protolanguage, diversification could have proceeded in any direction. Using extrapolation methods, signals for diachronic biases can also be estimated for isolates and small families, which represent over half of the known families. If most families show a bias, but there are as many biases toward S as against S worldwide, this suggests genealogical stability. If most biases are in the same direction, this suggests a diachronic universal or, if they are limited to certain geo-historical regions, areal trends or hotbed effects. Evidence for the theoretical assumptions of the Family Bias Method comes mainly from demonstrating that synchronic distributions in families cannot be successfully explained by alternative approaches, such as those assuming general stability indices.
2020.
Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Ilja A. Seržant (Eds.).
Explanation in Typology. Diachronic Sources, Functional Motivations and the Nature of the Evidence
. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Enfield, N. J., Jack Sidnell & Paul Kockelman
2014. System and function. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 25 ff.
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Laura Becker
2022. Statistical bias control in typology. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 605 ff.
Haig, Geoffrey & Diana Forker
2018. Agreement in grammar and discourse: A research overview. Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 715 ff.
Jäger, Gerhard & Johannes Wahle
2021. Phylogenetic Typology. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Krasnoukhova, Olga, Johan van der Auwera & Mily Crevels
2021. Investigating diachronic trends in phonological inventories using BDPROTO. Language Resources and Evaluation 55:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Nichols, Johanna
2015. How America Was Colonized: Linguistic Evidence. In Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas, ► pp. 117 ff.
Nikolaev, Dmitry & Eitan Grossman
2020. Consonant co-occurrence classes and the feature-economy principle. Phonology 37:3 ► pp. 419 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
2021. Cyclic changes in verbal person-number indexes are unlikely. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Shcherbakova, Olena, Damián E. Blasi, Volker Gast, Hedvig Skirgård, Russell D. Gray & Simon J. Greenhill
2024. The evolutionary dynamics of how languages signal who does what to whom. Scientific Reports 14:1
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2020. Linguistic system and sociolinguistic environment as competing factors in linguistic variation: A typological approach. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2
Urban, Matthias
2021. The geography and development of language isolates. Royal Society Open Science 8:4
Yan, Jianwei & Haitao Liu
2024. Basic word order typology revisited: a crosslinguistic quantitative study based on UD and WALS. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.