Questions and syntactic islands in Tundra Yukaghir
Dejan Matić | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
No island effects are observable in Tundra Yukaghir questions, which are possible in virtually all syntactic environments. It is argued that this feature of Tundra Yukaghir relates to its capability of explicitly marking focus domains. If a question word occurs in a syntactic island, the whole island is morphologically treated as a focus domain. In order to take scope and function as question markers, question words must remain within the focus domain, i.e. in the island clause. This syntactic configuration is reflected in the semantics of question islands, which are used to inquire about the identity of the whole island, not merely the denotation of the question word. Keywords: Tundra Yukaghir; content question; syntactic island; focus
References
Artstein, Ron.
2002 A focus semantics for echo questions. In
Workshop on Information Structure in Context,
Ágnes Bende-Farkas &
Arndt Riester (eds), 98-107. Stuttgart: IMS, University of Stuttgart.
[URL]
Bayer, Joseph.
2006 Wh-in-Situ. In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. V,
Martin Everaert &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 376-438. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Boeckx, Cedric.
2008 Islands.
Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 151-167.
Boeckx, Cedric.
2012 Syntactic Islands. Cambridge: CUP.
Cheng, Lisa.
2009 Wh-in-situ, from the 80s till now.
Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 767-791.
É. Kiss, Katalin.
1995 Introduction. In
Discourse Configurational Languages,
Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 3-27. Oxford: OUP.
Engdahl, Elisabet.
1980 Wh-constructions in Swedish and the relevance of subjacency.
Proceedings of NELS 11: 89-108.
Engdahl, Elisabet.
1997 Relative clause extractions in context.
Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60: 51-79.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi.
1973 On the Nature of Island Constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi.
1982 Extractability in Danish and the pragmatic principle of dominance. In
Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages,
Elisabet Engdahl &
Eva Ejerhed (eds), 175-192. Stockholm: Almquist & Wichsell International.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi.
1997 The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi.
2007 Information Structure. The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria.
2002 Echo-syntax and metarepresentations.
Lingua 112: 871-900.
Frege, Gottlob.
1892 Über Sinn und Bedeutung.
Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25-50.
Grice, Paul.
1981 Presupposition and conversational implicature. In
Radical Pragmatics,
Peter Cole (ed.), 183-198. New York NY: Academic Press.
Haida, Andreas.
2008 Indefiniteness and focusing of question words. In
Proceedings of SALT XVIII
,
Tova Friedman &
Satoshi Ito (eds).
[URL]
Hastings, Rachel.
2004 The Syntax and Semantics of Relativization and Quantification: The Case of Quechua. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Hoffmeister, Philip & Sag, Ivan.
2010 Cognitive constraints and island effects.
Language 86: 366-415.
Huang, C.-T. James.
1982.
Move wh in a language without movement.
The Linguistic Review 1: 369-416.
Jary, Mark.
2010 Assertion. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ko, Heejeong.
2005 Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 867-916.
Kishimoto, Hideki.
2005 Wh-in-situ and movement in Sinhala questions.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 1-51.
Krejnovič, Eruxim A.
1958 Jukagirskij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.
Krejnovič, Eruxim A.
1982 Issledovanija i materialy po jukagirskomu jazyku. Leningrad: Nauka.
K05 = Kurilov, Gavril N.
2005 Fol’klor jukagirov. Moscow: Nauka.
Kush, Dave; Akira Omaki & Norbert Hornstein,
2009 Reanalyzing relative clause island effects.
GLOW 32, Nantes.
[URL]
Ladd, D. Robert.
2008 Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Lambrecht, Knud.
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP.
M01 = Maslova, Elena.
2001 Yukaghir Texts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Maslova, Elena.
2003 Tundra Yukaghir. Munich: Lincom.
Matić, Dejan & Wedgwood, Daniel.
2013 The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis.
Journal of Linguistics 49.
Mycock, Louise.
2005 Wh-in-situ in constituent questions. In
Proceedings of LFG05
,
Miriam Butt &
Tracy Holloway King (eds), 313-333. Stanford: CSLI.
[URL]
Nishigauchi, Taisuke.
1990 Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pesetsky, David.
1987 Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In
The Representation of (In)definiteness,
Eric Reuland &
Alice ter Meulen (eds), 98-129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Ross, John Robert.
1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sabel, Joachim.
2002 A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands.
The Linguistic Review 19: 271-315.
Sobin, Nick.
1990 On the syntax of English echo questions.
Lingua 81: 141–167.
von Stechow, Arnim.
1996 Against LF pied-piping.
Natural Language Semantics 4: 57-110.
Szabolcsi, Anna.
2006 Strong vs. weak islands. In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV,
Martin Everaert &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 479-532. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Umbach, Carla.
2006 Non-restrictive modification and backgrounding. In
Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language
,
Beata Gyuris,
László, Kálmán,
Cristoph Piñón &
Karoly Varasdi (eds), 152-159. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
1998 The acquisition of wh-questions and the mechanisms of language acquisition. In
The New Psychology of Language,
Michael Tomasello (ed.), 221-249. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Nikitina, Tatiana & Alexandra Vydrina
2020.
Reported speech in Kakabe: Loose syntax with flexible indexicality
.
Folia Linguistica 54:1
► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.