Article published in:
Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 6998
References

References

Anderson, Stephen R.
1977On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Semantic Change, Charles N. Li, (ed.), 317–63. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
2001Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1986Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’. Linguistics 24: 503–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bostoen, Koen & Nzang-Bie, Yolande
2010On how “middle” plus “associative/reciprocal” became “passive” in the Bantu A70 languages. Linguistics 48(6): 1255–1307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brachet, Auguste
1882An Etymological Dictionary of the French Language. Translated by George William Kitchin, 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2006The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 69–92. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.html
Creissels, Denis
2008Direct and indirect explanations of typological regularities: The case of alignment variations. Folia Linguistica 42(1): 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Spatial cases. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–25. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2008Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phyologeny. Lingua 118: 141–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1986Explanation in natural morphology: Illustrated with comparative and agent-noun formation. Linguistics 24: 519–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endruschat, Annette
2007Durch ‘mit’ eingeleitete präpositionale Objekte in den romanischen Sprachen. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Estival, Dominique & John Myhill
1977Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In: Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed) Passive and Voice, 441–491. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1990The origin of split ergativity. Language 66(2): 261–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1998On Reconstructing Grammar. Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & de Castro Alves, Flavia
2010Nominative-absolutive: Counter-universal split ergativity in Je and Cariban. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalos (eds), 159–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2013Reflexive causative > passive in English and Cariban. Handout of presentation at the 21st Symposium About Language and Society-Austin (SALSA), 12 April 2013.
Grünthal, Riho
2003Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change. Helsinki: Societé Finno-ougrienne.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goedegebuure, Petra
2012Split-ergativity in Hittite. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 102(2): 270–303.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997From Space to Time. Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Grammaticalization of cases. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
2010Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–423. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung
2009Possessive subjects, nominalization, and ergativity in North Russia. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages. Papers Presented at the Workshop on Indo-European Linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 207–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S.
2007Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–61. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
. 22002Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd, revised edn. [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9]. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität. Earlier editions 1982, 1995.Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R.
2010Semantic maps and word formation: agents, instruments, and related semantic roles. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 162–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2001aSyncretism and the classification of semantic roles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(1): 35–51.Google Scholar
2001bSome remarks on instrument, comitative, and agent in Indo-European. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(4): 385–401.Google Scholar
2003On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Paths of semantic extension. From cause to beneficiary and purpose. In Historical Linguistics 2003. Selected Papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen, 11–15 August 2003. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 257], Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 141–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Where do beneficiaries come from and how do they come about? Sources for beneficiary expressions in Classical Greek and the typology of beneficiary. In Historical Cognitive Linguistics, Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allen (eds), 93–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Pompei, Anna & Skopeteas, Stavros
2005Ancient Greek. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Narrog, Heiko
2008Case polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–535. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura & Rosalie, Marcel
2000Polysémie et cartes sémantiques: La relateur (av)ek en créole Seychellois. Études Créoles 23(2): 79–100.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2009Varieties of Instrumental. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 593–600. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 233–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Ito, Shinya
2007Reconstructing semantic maps. The comitative-instrumental area. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4): 273–292.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael & Mihas, Elena
2007Areal dimensions in case syncretism: Ablatives and genitives. Paper presented at ALT VII, Paris, 25–28 September 2007.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary
, 3rd edn 2002 CD-Rom.
Palancar, Enrique L.
2002The Origin of Agent Markers [Studia Typologica 5]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poudel, Tikaram
2008Nepali ergativity: A historical perspective. Handout at the Workshop on Case and Alignment in Indo-European . University of Bergen, 10–11 December 2008.
Sawicki, Lea
1991Genitive and instrumental in passive constructions in Lithuanian. Indogermanische Forschungen 96: 168–74.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1950Griechische Grammatik. Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. Zweiter Band. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant
2001The causative continuum. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3: 136–177.Google Scholar
Shirane, Haruo
2005Classical Japanese. A Grammar. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1988The passive in Slavic. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 85], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 243–289. Benjamins: John Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Passive-to-ergative versus inverse-to-ergative. In Case, Typology and Grammar. In Honor of Barry J. Blake [Typological Studies in Language 38], Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds), 229–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
2001aComitatives vs. instrumentals vs. agents. In Aspects of Typology and Universals, Walter Bisang (ed.), 153–74. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2001bTo be with X is to have X: Comitatives, instrumentals, locative and predicative possession. Linguistics 39(2): 321–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina
2006On Comitatives and Related Categories. A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stroh, Cornelia
1998Die Geschichte der Mit-Relationen im Französischen: Komitativ-Instrumental-Synkretismus mit Hindernissen. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51(2): 131–156.Google Scholar
1999MIT-Relationen in der Romania: Ein klarer Fall? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52(2): 183–195.Google Scholar
Toyota, Junichi
2008Diachronic Change in the English Passive. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
1979On the origins of ergativity. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed), 385–404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic
2009The rise of ergativity in Hindi. Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30: 367–390.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2011The grammaticalization of passives. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 535–546. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Kazuyuki
2004A Typological, Historical, and Functional Study of Adpositions in the Languages of the World. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico.
Yan, Yaoliang
2003The Grammaticalization of Yu from a Verb to a Function Word. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Mohammadirad, Masoud & Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
2018. Functions of the dative: An Iranian perspective . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 71:4  pp. 539 ff. Crossref logo
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 567 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.