Article published in:
Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 181204


Bickel, Baltasar
2004The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60–61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1998Le marquage de l’experient dans les langues de l’Europe. In Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–2], Jack Feuillet (ed.), 259–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2010Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Exploring Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. ‘Aspects of the morphosyntax and semantics of the Early Vedic -tá participle and its prehistory’. In Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Selected papers from the workshop on Ergativity in Indo-Aryan at the SLE 43rd annual meeting [Typological Studies in Language], Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Dahl, Eystein & Fedriani, Chiara
2012The argument structure of experience: Experiential constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1888Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Miriam
2005A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3): 475–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Scott
2005The Lattice of Case and Agentivity. MSc Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Haig, Geoffrey
2009Non-canonical subjects and alignment change – where’s the connection? Handout from the Workshop ‘Reconstructing Alignment Systems’ May 14–15, 2009.
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans H.
1991Oblique Subjects in Sanskrit? In Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages, Manindra K. Verma & Karuvannur Puthanveettil Mohanan (eds), 119–139. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared
1985Toward a Discourse Grammar of the Rigveda, Vol. 1: Coordinate Conjunctions, Part 1. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2012The Vedic -ya-presents. Passives and Intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1991Predicate classes and PARTICIPATION. In Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (eds), 183–239. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus Beatrice
1999Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael B.
1993Cases as conceptual categories: Evidence from German. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processes in Language [Cognitive Linguistic Research 3], Richard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 531–566. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1993A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed), 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, E.
2007Experiential Constructions in Yucatec Maya [Studies in Language Companion Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 567 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.