Article published in:
Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 241270
References

References

Balles, Irene
2008Latein, Altgriechisch, Vol. 1: Nominale Wortbildung des Indogermanischen in Grundzügen, Rosemarie Lühr (ed.), Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1996English Word-formation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000What you can do with derivational morphology. In Morphology 2000. Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting (Vienna, 25–27 February 2000), Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolgang U. Dressler, Oskar Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (eds.), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1986Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch agent nouns. Linguistics 24: 503–517.Google Scholar
2007The Grammar of Words, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1933La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra
1985Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 349–98. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Crespo, Emilio
1997Sintaxis de los elementos de relación en griego clásico. In Actas del IX Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, Vol. 2, Francisco R. Adrados & Alfonso Martínez Díez (eds), 3–42. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
Crespo, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1973Some thoughts on agentivity, Journal of Linguistics 9: 11–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2007Building semantic maps: The case of person marking. In New Challenges in Typology, Bernhard Wälchli & Matti Miestamo (eds), 225–248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010Semantic maps as metrics of meaning. In Semantic Maps. Methods and Applications ( Linguistic Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 70–95.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehard, and Winston.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1997Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax: An Introduction, 2 Vols, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria
1998Formazioni dei nomi di agente, strumento e lugo in italiano. In Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di linguistica e Filologia, Giovanni Rufino (ed.), 383–393. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2003The geometry of grammatical meanings: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hernández, César
2005Los nombres de agente en micénico: Aspectos semánticos y morfológicos. MA thesis, Universidad Complutense (Madrid).
Koch, Peter
2001Metonymy. Unity in diversity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(2): 201–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1988Non-event -er nominals: A probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26: 1067–1083. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LSJ = Liddell, Henry George, Robert Scott & Henry Stuart Jones
1940A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R.
2010Semantic maps and word formation: Agents, Instruments, and related semantic roles. In Semantic Maps. Methods and Applications ( Linguistic Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov, 162–175.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1995Protypicality and agenthood in Indo-European. In Historical Linguistics 1993. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 259–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The container schema in Homeric Greek. In Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva, Augusto Soares de Silva, Amadeu Torres & Miguel Gonçalves (eds), 25–41. Braga: Almedina. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luschützky, Hans C. & Rainer, Franz
2011Agent noun polysemy in a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Typology and Universals 64(4): 287–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Instrument and place nouns. A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics 51(6) : 1301–1359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovič
1997Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive), Vol. 2 : Deuxième partie. Significations morphologiques. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Meyer-lübke, Wilhelm
1890Italienische Grammatik. Leipig: ReislandGoogle Scholar
Mugane, John M.
1997A Paradigmatic Grammar of Gîkûyû. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2010A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. In Semantic Maps: Methods and Applications (=lingusitics Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 233–254.Google Scholar
Olsen, Derek & Doris L. Payne
2009Maa (Maasai) nominalization: animacy, agentivity and instrument. In Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African linguistics: lingusitics theory and African Language Documentation, Masangu Matondo, Eric Potsdam & Fiona Mc laughlin (eds), 151–165. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique
2002The Origin of Agent Markers. Leipzig: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2001A conceptual analysis of English er nominals. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 2: Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plénat, Marc
2005Brèves remarques sur les déverbaux en -ette. In La syntaxe au coeur de la grammaire, Recueil offert en hommage au 60ème anniversaire de Claude Muller, Henning Nølke & Frederic Lambert (eds), 245–258. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexikon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz
2005Semantic change in word formation. Linguistics 43(2): 415–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, Malka & Levin, Beth
1992 -er Nominals: Implications for a theory of argument structure. In Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon, Tim Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds), 127–153. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen
1991Mixers, mufflers, and mousers: the extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Lingusitics Society, February 15–18, 1991: General session and parasession on the grammar of Event Structure, Laurel A. Sutton, Christophe Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds), 299–311. Berkeley: Berkeley Lingusitic Society.Google Scholar
Schlessinger, Izchak
1989Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations. Journal of Linguistics 25: 189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997Syntax, Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villoing, Florence & Namer, Fiammetta
2008Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -OIR du français. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF’08, Jacques Durand, Bruno Habert & Bernard Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. http://​www​.linguistiquefrancaise​.org or CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1922Vorlesungen über Syntax: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Basel: Emil Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 567 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.