From semantic roles to evaluative markers. The dative and affected possessors
A constructional comparison between German, Italian and French
This paper targets the phenomenon of non valence-governed datives of affectedness linked to possession. By adopting a constructional approach based on Goldberg (1995) and a revision of Raineri and Evola (2008), I work out a grid that may be adopted for cross-linguistic purposes. By applying this model to German, French and Italian, I show that the latter language, contrary to the two former ones has thoroughly grammaticalized this function. I also propose a tentative account of the grammaticalization paths that may have led to the heterogeneous behavior of the languages under discussion with respect to this construction. Keywords: Construction Grammar; Dative; Beneficiary; Maleficiary; Affectedness; Grammaticalization
References (42)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006 The properties of anti-causatives crosslinguistically. In
Phases of Interpretation,
Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan
2007 Frequency of Usage and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
1990 Possible verbs and event structure. In
Meanings and Prototypes: Studies on Linguistic Categorization,
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 48–73. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dabrowska, Ewa
1997 Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David R
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.
Language 67(3): 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier Gilles & Turner, Mark
2002 The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
2002 Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations.
Cognitive Linguistics 13(4): 327–356.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
Gutzmann, Daniel
2007 Eine Implikatur konventioneller Art: Der Dativus Ethicus.
Linguistische Berichte 211: 277–308.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd
1997 Possession: Cognitive Forces, Sources, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hens, Gregor
1997 Constructional semantics in German: The dative of inaction.
American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9(2): 191–219.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kallulli, Dalina
2004 De-agentivised causers or non-active causative predications’ predications. In
The Pre-conference Proceedings of the Workshop “Demoting the Agent: Passive and Other Voice-related Phenomena
”. University of Oslo, 59–66.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 Middle Voice [
Typological Studies in Language 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kimps, Ditte & Davidse, Kristin
2008 Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: A typology.
Text & Talk 28(6): 699–722.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2005 Recipient-prominence vs beneficiary-prominence.
Linguistic Typology 9(2): 269–97.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard & Haspelmath, Martin
1998 Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues d’Europe. In
Actance et Valence dans les Langues d’Europe [
Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–2],
Jacque Feuillet (ed.), 525–606. Berlin: De Gruyter. Cited after the online version available at:
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W 1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald
2000 Grammar and Conceptualization. [
Cognitive Linguistics Research 14]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maldonado, Ricardo
2002 Objective and subjective datives.
Cognitive Linguistics 13(1): 1–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntyre, Andrew
2011 Silent possessive PPs in English Double Object (+Particle) Constructions. Quoted after the online version available at:
[URL]
McKoon, Gail & Macfarland, Talke
2000 Externally and internally caused change of state verbs.
Language 76(4): 833–858.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitkovska, Liljana
2011 Competition between nominal possessive constructions and the possessive Dative in Macedonian. In
The Grammar of Possessivity in South Slavic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives,
Nomachi Motoki (ed.), 83–109. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nava, Fernando & Maldonado, Ricardo
2005 Basic voice patterns in Tarascan (P’orhepecha). In
Language, Culture, and Mind,
Michel Achard &
Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 461–478. Stanford CA: CSLI. Cited after the online version available at:
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’ Connor, Mary Catherine
2007 External possession and utterance interpretation: A crosslinguistic exploration.
Linguistics 45(3): 577–613.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne Doris L. & Barshi, Immanuel
Raineri, Sophie & Evola, Vito
2008 A Construction Grammar Analysis of the Empathetic Dative Construction in French and Italian. Ms.
Šarić, Ljiljana
2002 On the semantics of the dative of possession in the Slavic languages: An analysis on the basis of Russian, Polish, Croatian/Serbian and Slovenian examples.
Glossos 3. Slavic and East European Language Resource Center, Duke University. Cited after the online version available at:
[URL]
Schäfer, Florian
2007 On the Nature of Anticausative Morphology: External Arguments in Change-of State Contexts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stuttgart. Cited after the online version at:
[URL]
Smith, Carlota S
1970 ‘Jespersen’s ‘move and change’ class and causative verbs in English. In
Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill,
Mohammad Ali Jazayery,
Edgar Polomé &
Werner Winter (eds), 101–110. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tuggy, David
1980 Ethical datives and possessor omission sí, possessor ascension no! Workpapers of the SIL 24: 97–141. University of North Dakota.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & Wilkins, David P
1996 The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In
Grammatical Constructions,
Masayoshi Shibatani &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 289–322. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Kalnača, Andra & Ilze Lokmane
2023.
Attitude dative (dativus ethicus) as an interpersonal pragmatic marker in Latvian.
Open Linguistics 9:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017.
<i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2
► pp. 567 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Seržant, Ilja A.
2016.
External possession and constructions that may have it.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1
► pp. 131 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.