Part of
Negation in Uralic Languages
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm and Beáta Wagner-Nagy
[Typological Studies in Language 108] 2015
► pp. 353376
References (18)
References
van der Auwera, Johan & Lejeune, Ludo. 2005. The prohibitive. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 290–293. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27(1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EE = Evvan evaŋǧeʹlium (Gospel of John). 1988. Helsinki: Lääʹdd pipliaseäʹrvv.Google Scholar
Feist, Timothy. 2010. A Grammar of Skolt Saami. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Toivo Immanuel. 1931. Koltan- ja kuolanlappalaisia satuja (Skolt and Kola Lappish Tales) [Suomalais-ugrilaisen seuran toimituksia 60]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Kahrel, Peter. 1996. Aspects of Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Koponen, Eino & Moshnikoff, Jouni & Moshnikoff, Satu. 2010. Sääʹmǩiõll, äʹrbbǩiõll (Skolt Saami, Heritage Language) [Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 14]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. 〈[URL]Google Scholar
Korhonen, Mikko. 1973. Kieliopin pääkohdat (The essentials of grammar). In Koltansaamen opas (Guide to Skolt Saami) [Castrenianumin toimitteita 4], Mikko Korhonen, Jouni Moshnikoff & Pekka Sammallahti, 9–97. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Google Scholar
. 1969[1996]. Die Entwicklung der morphologischen Technik im Lappischen. In Typological and Historical Studies in Language by Mikko Korhonen. A Memorial Volume Published on the 60th Anniversary of His Birth [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 223], Tapani Salminen (ed.), 17–143. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society. [Originally published in Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 37, 1969]Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011a. Polar interrogatives in Uralic languages: A typological perspective. Linguistica Uralica 47(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Skolt Saami: A typological profile. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 93: 111–145.Google Scholar
Moshnikoff, Satu & Moshnikoff, Jouni & Koponen, Eino. 2009. Koltansaamen koulukielioppi. Sääʹmǩiõl ǩiõllvuäʹppes škoou’li vääras (School Grammar of Skolt Saami). Inari/Aanar: Saamelaiskäräjät/Sääʹmteʹǧǧ.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1998. The Saami Languages. An Introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semenoja, Sinikka. 1994. Toben mädd mâʹte vuäđđ. Oulu: Oulun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013. Negative existentials: A cross linguistic study. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 107–146. Special issue on Existential Constructions.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Niinemägi, Merit
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2021. Chapter 6. Perfect and negation. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217],  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.