Cover not available
Part of
Negation in Uralic Languages
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm and Beáta Wagner-Nagy
[Typological Studies in Language 108] 2015
► pp. 517–546

Indefinite pronouns in Uralic languages

| University of Antwerp
ORCID logo | University of Antwerp

In this paper, different types of indefinite pronouns and adverbs that can occur in negative sentences in the Uralic languages will be described and discussed against a wider typological background. It will be shown that Uralic languages display the typological default strategy as to the interaction with sentential negation – Uralic indefinite pronouns and adverbs in negative contexts always require the presence of sentential negation – but do not show unity as to the type of indefinite used in negation. Four different types will be distinguished: neutral indefinites, negative polarity indefinites, and two types of negative indefinites: morphologically non-negative ones and morphologically negative ones.

Published online: 24 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108.19als
References
Abondolo, Daniel
1998 Khanty. In Abondolo (ed.), 358–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1998 The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alhoniemi, Alho
1993 Grammatik des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Mit Texten und Glossar. Aus dem Finnischen übersetzt von Hans-Hermann Bartens. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Alvre, Paul
1982 Läänemeresoome indefiniitpronoomeneist. In Voces amicorum Sovijärvi [MSFOu 181], Antti Iivonen, Seppo Suhonen & Pertti Virtaranta (eds), 45–55. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2002 Russische Lehnelemente in Indefinitpronomen und Adverbien der Ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Linguistica Uralica 48: 161–164.Google Scholar
Ariste, Paul
1997 Grammar of the Votic Language. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2009 The Jespersen cycles. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], Elly Van Gelderen (ed.), 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 73–109. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 Review of ‘Expression and interpretation of negation: An OT typology’ by Henriëtte de Swart. Language 87: 845–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, De Cuypere, Ludovic & Neuckermans, Annemie
2006 Negative indefinites: A typological and diachronic perspective on a Brabantic construction. In Types of Variation. Diachronic, Dialectal and Typological Interfaces, Terttu Nevalainen, Juhani Klemola & Mikko Laitinen (eds), 305–319. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Van Alsenoy, Lauren
2011 Indefinite pronouns, synchrony and diachrony: Comments on Willis. In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds), 325–345. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bajdak, A.V., Maksimova, N.P. & Fedotova, N.L
2010 Sel’kupskye teksty [Selkup texts]. In Annotated Folklore Prose Text of Ob-Yenissey Language Area, Andrey Filchenko (ed.), 133–184. Tomsk: Veter.Google Scholar
Bartens, Hans-Hermann
1989 Lehrbuch der saamischen (lappischen) Sprache. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo
1996 Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe: A Typological Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara
2005 Pronouns. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castrén, Alexander
(1854) 1966 Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Reprint, Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Csúcs, Sándor
1988 Die wotjakische Sprache. In The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 131–176. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
1998 Udmurt. In Abondolo (ed.), 276–304.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane
1997 Two types of negative concord. Probus 9: 103–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002 The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Negative quantifiers in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 11: Papers from the 2007 New York Conference, Marcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds), 65–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elšik, Viktor & Matras, Yaron
2006 Markedness and Language Change: The Romani Sample. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erelt, Mati
2003 Estonian Language. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1975 Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–375.Google Scholar
Feist, Timothy
2010 A Grammar of Skolt Saami. Ph.D. dissertation, Manchester University.
Filchenko, Andrey
2012 Negation in Eastern Khanty. Вестник ТГПУ (TSPU Bulletin) 1(116): 38–44.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
2011 Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87: 2–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2000 Negative … concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Varieties of polarity items and the (Non)veridicality Hypothesis. In Perspectives on Negation and Polarity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40], Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sanchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 99–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien: La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques: An International Handbook: Ein internationales Handbuch: Manuel international, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Indefinite Pronouns. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 46. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/46〉 (3 July 2013).Google Scholar
Hausenberg, Anu-Reet
1998 Komi. In Abondolo (ed.), 305–326.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen
1998a Nganasan. In Abondolo (ed.), 480–515.Google Scholar
1998b Selkup. In Abondolo (ed.), 548–579.Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena
2001 The negative concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
2011 Specificity, referentiality and discourse prominence: German indefinite demonstratives. In Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 15, Ingo Reich, et al. (eds), 9–30. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Hienonen, Heini
2010 The implicational semantic map for Veps indefinite pronouns. Linguistica Uralica 46: 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honti, László
1988a Die ob-ugrischen Sprachen – Die wogulische Sprache. In The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 147–171. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
1988b Die ob-ugrischen Sprachen – Die ostjakische Sprache. In The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 172–198. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
1997 Die Negation im Uralischen II. Linguistica Uralica 33: 161–176.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
1989 A Natural History of Negation. Stanford CA: CSLI. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
2011 The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010 Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 787–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahrel, Peter
1996 Aspects of Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Karlsson, Fred
2004 Finnische Grammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Frances & Karttunen, Lauri
1976 The clitic -kin/-kaan in Finnish. Texas Linguistic Forum 5: 89–118.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vágó, Robert Michael & Fenyvesi, Anna
1998 Hungarian. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keresztes, László
1998 Mansi. In Abondolo (ed.), 387–427.Google Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri
1938 Livisches Wörterbuch mit grammatischer Einleitung. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Khanina, Olesya & Shluinsky, Andrey
2011 Emphatic transcategorial morphology: A cross-linguistically rare phenomenon in Enets. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Lutz Marten & David Nathan (eds), 171–181. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Künnap, Ago
1998 Enets [LWM 186]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
1999 Kamass [LWM 185]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Laanest, Arvo
1982 Einführung in die ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Labanauskas, Kazis Izidoraus
2001 Jamidhy” lahanaku” (Ancient Stories). Moskva: Izdatel’tsvo Russkaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William
1979 Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Austin TX.
Lyons, Christopher
1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2009 Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metslang, Helle, Pajusalu, Karl & Viitso, Tiit-Rein
2011 Presentation given at the Workshop Negation in Uralic Languages, Stockholm University, 24–25 November 2011.
Miestamo, Matti
2007 Negation – An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 552–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moseley, Christopher
2002 Livonian [LWM 144]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Nevis, J.A
1984 A non-endoclitic in Estonian. Lingua 64: 209–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rédei, Károly
1988 Die syrjänische Sprache. In The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 111–130. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Rießler, Michael
2007 Grammatical borrowing in Kildin Saami. In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds), 229–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozhanskiy, Fedor
2010 Negative pronominal forms in Luuditsa Votic. In Congressus XI Internationalis Fenno-ugristarum: 11th International Congress for Fenno-Ugric Studies, Piliscsaba, Hungary, 9.-14.08.2010 (Summaria acroasium in sectionibus), Sándor Csúcs, Nóra Falk, Viktória Püspök, Viktória Tóth, Gábor Zaicz (eds), 213–214. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte
2010 Expression and Interpretation of Negation: An OT Typology. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tereščenko, N.M. [Терещенко, Н.М
] 1979 Nganasanskij jazyk (Nganasan language). Ленинград: Наука.Google Scholar
Tóth, Ildikó
1999 Negative polarity item licensing in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46: 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1978 Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4: Syntax, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 211–248. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward
2009 Loanwords in Ket. A Yeniseian language of Siberia. In Loanwords in the World’s Languages. A Comparative Handbook, Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds), 471–495. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Alsenoy, Lauren & van der Auwera, Johan
2014 On the relation between double clausal negation and negative concord. In Diachrony of Negation [Studies in Language Companion Series 160], Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 14–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veyrenc, Jacques
1964 Кто-нибудь et кто-либо formes concurrentes? Revue des études slaves 40: 224–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viitso, Tiit-Rein
1998 Estonian. In Abondolo (ed.), 115–148.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2006 Negationsmöglichkeiten im Nganasanischen. WEB-FU 04/2006. 〈http://​webfu​.univie​.ac​.at​/wp​/427〉 (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2011 On the Typology of Negation in Ob-Ugric and Samoyedic Languages [Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 262]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Willis, David
2011 Negative polarity and the Quantifier Cycle: Comparative diachronic perspectives from European languages. In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard Ingham (eds), 285–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Eberhard
2001 Udmurt [LWM 212]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Yoon, Suwon
2011 ‘Not’ in the Mood: The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Evaluative Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004 Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Forker, Diana & Lenore A. Grenoble
2021. Some structural similarities in the outcomes of language contact with Russian. In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], DOI logo
Kashkin, Egor & Nikita Muravyev
2021. Izhma Komi in Western Siberia. In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], DOI logo
van der Auwera, Johan & Lauren Van Alsenoy
2016. On the typology of negative concord. Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.