Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 109132
References (41)
References
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1986. The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9 – 13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Baumann, George. 1975. Drei Jaina-Gedichte in Alt-Gujarātī. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 1989. An interpretation of split ergativity in Indo-Iranian languages. Diachronica 6(2): 181-212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. The study of ergativity in functional grammar. In Function and Expressions in Functional Grammar. Functional Grammar Series [Functional Grammar Series 16], Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen Lone Schack Rasmussen (eds), 97-108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
.1998. A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On the actualization of the passive-to-ergative shift in Pre-Islamic India. In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219], Henning Andersen (ed.), 95-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, Vit & Paranjape, Chitra. 1996. Development of pronominal systems from Apabhraṃśa to New-Indo-Aryan. Indo-Iranian Journal 39: 111-132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sarah. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-393. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. Forthcoming. The imperfective-perfective contrast in Middle Indic.
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John. 1988. Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 441-91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1998. On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax [Oxford Studies in Antropological Linguistics 18]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1919[1968]. Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. VIII, Parts I and II. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. 2008. Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Alignment. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistic, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 250-268. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, Robert D. 1989. The Syntax and Semantics of Verb Morphology in Modern Aramaic. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Kelkar, Ashok R. 1968. Studies in Hindi-Urdu I. Introduction and Word Phonology. Poona: Deccan College & Postgraduate Research Institute.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 2007. Ergativity in the North Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Studies in Semitic and General Linguistics in Honor of Gideon Goldenberg, Tali Bar & Eran Cohen (eds), 147-157. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, Lachman M. 2003. Sindhi. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 622-658. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 2000. Typological evolution of Western New Indo-Aryan languages. Berliner Indologische Studien 13-14:117-142.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajasthani). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 159-184.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1978. Arguments against a passive origin of the ergative. In Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting , 204–216. Chicago IL: CLS.
Mayrhofer, George A. 1951. Handbuch des Pāli. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Miltner, Vladimír. 1995. Old Hindi Reader. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Nosek, Bedřich. 2001. Aramejština babylónského talmudu. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Theodore. 2003. Nepali. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 538-580. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saksēnā, Bāburām. 1937[1971]. Evolution of Avadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Schokker, G.H. 1969-70. The jānā-passive in the NIA languages. Indo-Iranian Journal 12:1-23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Strnad, Jaroslav. 2013. Morphology and Syntax of Old Hindī: Edition and Analysis of One Hundred Kabīr vānī Poems from Rājasthān [Indological Library 45]. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2011. Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi P. 1914-16. Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani. The Indian Antiquary XLIII-XLIV: 1–106Google Scholar
Peterson, John M. 1998. Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Singh, Nāmawar. 1956. Prithvirāj rāso ki bhāṣā. Benares: Saraswati Press.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje. 2013. Differential subject marking in Nepali: The agent marker le in imperfective constructions. Linguistics 51(3): 585-610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William D. 1982. The evolution of ergative syntax in Nepali. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12(2): 147-211.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Barchi, Francesco & Benedikt Peschl
2022. Preterite Formations in Niya Prakrit and Khotanese: A Case of Grammatical Interference?. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 75:3  pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3  pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Eystein
2021. Pathways to split ergativity. Diachronica 38:3  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Vit, Bubenik
2018. Eleanor Coghill: The rise and fall of ergativity in Aramaic. Cycles of Alignment Change . Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s2  pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018. The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.