Cover not available
Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 109–132

On the establishment of ergative alignment during the Late Middle Indo-Aryan period

| Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

I will argue that the Late Middle Indo-Aryan period (7–11th c.) was the crucial period for the establishment of ergative alignment as known from contemporary West Indo-Aryan languages (Bubenik 1998). I will demonstrate that the syncretism of case leading to the appearance of the absolutive case in the nominal system was caused by phonological change, while the way case marking alignment was distributed over the pronominal system can primarily be attributed to the effects of animacy. On the verbal side the increase in ergativity came as a consequence of the ultimate demise of the old aspectual forms. I will endorse a ‘contingency view’ of alignment (Dixon 1994, Haig 2008) which considers the increase in ergativity as a mere ‘by-product’ of the restoration by analytic means of the old aspectual triad.

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112.04bub
References
Andersen, Paul Kent
1986 The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9 – 13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R
1977 On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Baumann, George
1975 Drei Jaina-Gedichte in Alt-Gujarātī. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1989 An interpretation of split ergativity in Indo-Iranian languages. Diachronica 6(2): 181-212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The study of ergativity in functional grammar. In Function and Expressions in Functional Grammar. Functional Grammar Series [Functional Grammar Series 16], Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen Lone Schack Rasmussen (eds), 97-108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998 A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 On the actualization of the passive-to-ergative shift in Pre-Islamic India. In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219], Henning Andersen (ed.), 95-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, Vit & Paranjape, Chitra
1996 Development of pronominal systems from Apabhraṃśa to New-Indo-Aryan. Indo-Iranian Journal 39: 111-132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sarah
1978 Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978 Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-393. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini
Forthcoming. The imperfective-perfective contrast in Middle Indic.
Dik, Simon C
1980 Studies in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1994 Ergativity. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John
1988 Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 441-91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1998 On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax [Oxford Studies in Antropological Linguistics 18]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A
1919[1968] Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. VIII, Parts I and II. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey
2008 Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Alignment. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistic, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 250-268. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, Robert D
1989 The Syntax and Semantics of Verb Morphology in Modern Aramaic. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986 P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Kelkar, Ashok R
1968 Studies in Hindi-Urdu I. Introduction and Word Phonology. Poona: Deccan College & Postgraduate Research Institute.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey
2007 Ergativity in the North Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Studies in Semitic and General Linguistics in Honor of Gideon Goldenberg, Tali Bar & Eran Cohen (eds), 147-157. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, Lachman M
2003 Sindhi. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 622-658. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
2000 Typological evolution of Western New Indo-Aryan languages. Berliner Indologische Studien 13-14:117-142.Google Scholar
2001 Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajasthani). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 159-184.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H
1978 Arguments against a passive origin of the ergative. In Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting , 204–216. Chicago IL: CLS.
Mayrhofer, George A
1951 Handbuch des Pāli. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Miltner, Vladimír
1995 Old Hindi Reader. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Nosek, Bedřich
2001 Aramejština babylónského talmudu. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Theodore
2003 Nepali. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 538-580. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saksēnā, Bāburām
1937[1971] Evolution of Avadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Schokker, G.H
1969-70 The jānā-passive in the NIA languages. Indo-Iranian Journal 12:1-23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Strnad, Jaroslav
2013 Morphology and Syntax of Old Hindī: Edition and Analysis of One Hundred Kabīr vānī Poems from Rājasthān [Indological Library 45]. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2011 Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi P
1914-16 Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani. The Indian Antiquary XLIII-XLIV: 1–106Google Scholar
Peterson, John M
1998 Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Singh, Nāmawar
1956 Prithvirāj rāso ki bhāṣā. Benares: Saraswati Press.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2013 Differential subject marking in Nepali: The agent marker le in imperfective constructions. Linguistics 51(3): 585-610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William D
1982 The evolution of ergative syntax in Nepali. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12(2): 147-211.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Eystein
2021. Pathways to split ergativity. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Vit, Bubenik
2018. Eleanor Coghill: The rise and fall of ergativity in Aramaic. Cycles of Alignment Change . Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s2 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018. The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.