Cover not available
Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 133–164

Why the ergative case in modal (in)transitive clauses? The historical evolution of aspect, modality, ergative and locative in Indo-Aryan

| Inalco, Paris, UMR 8202 (CNRS | INALCO | IRD)
Hindi transitive verbs, contrary to Bengali verbs, require the ergative structure in the perfective aspect, an atypical feature for an Indo-European language, and are considered to display only surface ergativity, since most syntactic and discursive properties are attached to the agent. However its affinities with other locational predications in the dative, as well as the historical parallel rise of both pre-ergative and modal future patterns in Western Indo-Aryan, the paper develops Montaut’s earlier suggestions (1996, 2006), with an attempt to reconcile Benveniste’s well-known theory of the “possessive perfect” (1952) with Kurylowicz’s views on the parallel evolution of future and past in Romance and Persian languages (1960), and a study of ergative and dative new markers in various Indo-Aryan languages.
Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112.05mon
References (53)
References
Bashir, Elena. 2006. The Urdu and Hindi ergative postposition ne: Its changing role in the grammar. In The Year book of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 11-36. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beames, John. 1970[1871]. A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966[1952, 1960, 1965]. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1970 [1920]. The Formation of the Marathi Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
. 1906. La phrase nominale en sanscrit. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Breunis, André. 1990. The Nominal Sentence in Sanskrit and Middle Indo-Aryan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit & Paranjape, Chitra 1996. Development of pronominal systems from Apabhramsha to New Indo-Aryan. Indo-Iranian Journal 39: 11-32.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William (eds). 1994. The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1970. The Indo-Iranian construction mana/mama krtam . Language 46:1-12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George & Suthar, Babu. 2003. Gujarati. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 658-697. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chatak, Govind. 1966. Madhyapahari ka bhashashastrîa adhyayan. Delhi: Radhakrishna Pr.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar. 1986[1926]. The Evolution of Bengali Language. Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626-657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desai, Mohan. 1926. Jain Gurjar Kavyo, 3 Vols. Bombay: Jain Svetambar Conference Office.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice. 2002. Agreement features and projections of tense and aspect. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics Rajendra Singh (ed.), 27-57. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 2006. Subject and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1903-1928. Linguistic Survey of India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 1992. Studies in Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Jha, Subhadra. 1985[1958]. The Formation of the Maithili Language. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Juyal, Govind. 1976. Madhya Pahari Bhasha (Garhvali Kumaoni) ka anushilan aur uska hindi se sambandh. Lucknow: Navyug Granthagar.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1987. Ergativity, subjecthood and topicality. Lingua 71: 223-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Rev. S.H. 1972[1875]. A Grammar of the Hindi Language [… Braj, (…) Dialects of Marwar, Kumaon, Awadh, Baghelkhand, Bhojpur, etc.]. Delhi: Oriental Book Reprints.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1960 [1953, 1931]. Esquisses Linguistiques. Kraków: Polska Akademia Nauk.Google Scholar
. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogène 51: 51-71.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Anup. 1997. Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13], Artemis Alexiadou & T. Alan Hall (eds), 35-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1990. The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mistry, P.J. 1997. Objecthood and specificity in Gujarati. In The Life of Language, Jane H. Hill, P.J. Mistry & Lyle Campbell (eds), 425-442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Montaut, Annie. 1996. L’évolution des systèmes perfectal et futur en indo-aryen occidental et oriental. Journal Asiatique 284(2) : 325-360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Le renouvellement des formes verbales en hindi/ourdou. Journal Asiatique 287(2) : 587-628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In Non nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 35-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu: The status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nespital, Helmut. 1986. Zum Verhältnis von Genus Verbi, Nominativ- und Ergativ- Konstruktionen im Hindoarischen aus synchroner und diachroner Sicht. Müinchener Studien zur Spachwissenschaft 47: 127-58.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. A Grammar of the Marathi Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2003. Marathi. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), Indo-Aryan Languages, 698-728. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 1998. Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pirejko, Lija A. 1979. On the genesis of ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Ergativity; Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Franz Plank (ed.), 658-697. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saksena, Ram Baburam. 1971[1937]. Evolution of Awadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Singh Jag Deva, 1970. A Descriptive Grammar of Bangru. Kurukshetra: Kurukshetra University.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jan S. 1980[1886]. Sanskrit Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Strnad, Jaroslav. 2012. A note on the locative/instrumental/ergative in Old Hindi. Archiv Orientalni 30: 41-64.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010. Non-nominative subjects in Rajasthani and Central Pahari. The status of the ergative and obligative constructions. Lingua Posnaniensis LII(1): 81-97.Google Scholar
Tagare, Ganesh Vasudeva. 1948. Historical Grammar of Apabhramsha. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi. 1913. On the origin of dative and genitive postpositions in Marwari and Gujarati. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 45(3): 553-567.Google Scholar
Tessitori Luigi. 1914-16. Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani, with special reference to Apabhramsha and to Gujarati and Marwari. Indian Antiquary 43-44: 1-106.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi. 1914. On the origin of the perfect participles in 1 in the Neo-Indian vernaculars. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 68: 571-578.Google Scholar
Tiwari, Udaynarayan. 1966. The Development of Bhojpuri. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
. 1961. Hindi Bhasha ka udgam aur uska vikas. Prayag: Bharati Bhandar.Google Scholar
Trask, R. Larry. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Ergativity; Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Franz Plank (ed.), 385-404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trumpp, Ernest. 1872. Grammar of the Sindhi Language. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi. 2004a. Marathi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Non-nominative subjects in Marathi. In Non nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 223-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar