Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 133164
References (53)
References
Bashir, Elena. 2006. The Urdu and Hindi ergative postposition ne: Its changing role in the grammar. In The Year book of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 11-36. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beames, John. 1970[1871]. A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966[1952, 1960, 1965]. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1970 [1920]. The Formation of the Marathi Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
. 1906. La phrase nominale en sanscrit. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Breunis, André. 1990. The Nominal Sentence in Sanskrit and Middle Indo-Aryan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit & Paranjape, Chitra 1996. Development of pronominal systems from Apabhramsha to New Indo-Aryan. Indo-Iranian Journal 39: 11-32.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William (eds). 1994. The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1970. The Indo-Iranian construction mana/mama krtam . Language 46:1-12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George & Suthar, Babu. 2003. Gujarati. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds), 658-697. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chatak, Govind. 1966. Madhyapahari ka bhashashastrîa adhyayan. Delhi: Radhakrishna Pr.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar. 1986[1926]. The Evolution of Bengali Language. Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626-657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desai, Mohan. 1926. Jain Gurjar Kavyo, 3 Vols. Bombay: Jain Svetambar Conference Office.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice. 2002. Agreement features and projections of tense and aspect. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics Rajendra Singh (ed.), 27-57. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 2006. Subject and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1903-1928. Linguistic Survey of India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 1992. Studies in Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Jha, Subhadra. 1985[1958]. The Formation of the Maithili Language. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Juyal, Govind. 1976. Madhya Pahari Bhasha (Garhvali Kumaoni) ka anushilan aur uska hindi se sambandh. Lucknow: Navyug Granthagar.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1987. Ergativity, subjecthood and topicality. Lingua 71: 223-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Rev. S.H. 1972[1875]. A Grammar of the Hindi Language [… Braj, (…) Dialects of Marwar, Kumaon, Awadh, Baghelkhand, Bhojpur, etc.]. Delhi: Oriental Book Reprints.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1960 [1953, 1931]. Esquisses Linguistiques. Kraków: Polska Akademia Nauk.Google Scholar
. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogène 51: 51-71.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Anup. 1997. Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13], Artemis Alexiadou & T. Alan Hall (eds), 35-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1990. The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mistry, P.J. 1997. Objecthood and specificity in Gujarati. In The Life of Language, Jane H. Hill, P.J. Mistry & Lyle Campbell (eds), 425-442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Montaut, Annie. 1996. L’évolution des systèmes perfectal et futur en indo-aryen occidental et oriental. Journal Asiatique 284(2) : 325-360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Le renouvellement des formes verbales en hindi/ourdou. Journal Asiatique 287(2) : 587-628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In Non nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 35-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu: The status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nespital, Helmut. 1986. Zum Verhältnis von Genus Verbi, Nominativ- und Ergativ- Konstruktionen im Hindoarischen aus synchroner und diachroner Sicht. Müinchener Studien zur Spachwissenschaft 47: 127-58.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. A Grammar of the Marathi Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2003. Marathi. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), Indo-Aryan Languages, 698-728. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 1998. Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pirejko, Lija A. 1979. On the genesis of ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Ergativity; Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Franz Plank (ed.), 658-697. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saksena, Ram Baburam. 1971[1937]. Evolution of Awadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Singh Jag Deva, 1970. A Descriptive Grammar of Bangru. Kurukshetra: Kurukshetra University.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jan S. 1980[1886]. Sanskrit Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Strnad, Jaroslav. 2012. A note on the locative/instrumental/ergative in Old Hindi. Archiv Orientalni 30: 41-64.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010. Non-nominative subjects in Rajasthani and Central Pahari. The status of the ergative and obligative constructions. Lingua Posnaniensis LII(1): 81-97.Google Scholar
Tagare, Ganesh Vasudeva. 1948. Historical Grammar of Apabhramsha. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi. 1913. On the origin of dative and genitive postpositions in Marwari and Gujarati. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 45(3): 553-567.Google Scholar
Tessitori Luigi. 1914-16. Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani, with special reference to Apabhramsha and to Gujarati and Marwari. Indian Antiquary 43-44: 1-106.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi. 1914. On the origin of the perfect participles in 1 in the Neo-Indian vernaculars. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 68: 571-578.Google Scholar
Tiwari, Udaynarayan. 1966. The Development of Bhojpuri. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
. 1961. Hindi Bhasha ka udgam aur uska vikas. Prayag: Bharati Bhandar.Google Scholar
Trask, R. Larry. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Ergativity; Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Franz Plank (ed.), 385-404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trumpp, Ernest. 1872. Grammar of the Sindhi Language. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi. 2004a. Marathi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Non-nominative subjects in Marathi. In Non nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 223-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar