Cover not available
Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 201–236

The restoration of the ergative case marking of ‘A’ in perfective clauses in New Indo-Aryan

The case of the Braj language*

| Ca' Foscari University of Venice

The development of the ergative construction in the New Indo-Aryan period is still not totally clear. In particular we don’t know the process of grammaticalization of the new analytical ergative marker, the postposition ne, found, among others, in Hindī and Pañjābī. This study tries to demonstrate that if it is true that the “macro-history” of this form suggests that the discriminatory function of case marking is clearly important in the beginning of its process of diffusion and stabilization, it is also true that there is no single interpretation as regards its high initial variability. In fact, starting from data taken from prose texts written in the old Hindī literary variety known as Braj-bhās�ā, the full set of conditions on case alternations for A in the perfective aspect is really complex.

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112.07dro
References
Andersen, Paul Kent
1986a Die ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Aśoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99: 75-94.Google Scholar
1986b The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9-13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R
1977 On mechanism by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Arnot, Sandford
1831 A New Self-instructing Grammar of the Hindustani Tongue, the Most Useful and General Language of British India, in the Oriental and Roman Character (With Appendix of Reading Exercises and Vocabulary). London.Google Scholar
Balbir, Nicole de Tugny
1991 De Fort William au hindi littéraire: La transformation de la Khari boli en langue littéraire moderne au XIXe siècle. In Littératures médiévales de l’Inde du Nord, Françoise Mallison & Charlotte Vaudeville (eds), 187-204. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, James R
1838 Grammar of the Hindustani Language, with Grammatical Exercices. London.Google Scholar
Barz, Richard K
1976 The Bhakti Sect of Vallabhācārya. Faridabad: Thompson Press India.Google Scholar
1982 A beginning in prose: Some steps in the emergence of modern Hindi literature. South Asia 5(1): 5-15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beames, John
1872-1879 A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India. London: Trubner & Co. (reprint 1966, Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal).Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, Mangat R
1995 Colloquial Panjabi. A Complete Language Course. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Tej K
1981 The treatment of transitivity in the Hindi grammatical tradition. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11(2): 195-208.Google Scholar
1987 A History of the Hindi Grammatical Tradition. Hindi-Hindustani Grammar, Grammarians, History and Problems. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
1993 Punjabi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2000 Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Punjabi. In Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology, Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), 637-715. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Jules
1906 La phrase nominale en sanskrit [Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique XIV]. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
1920 La formation de la langue marathe. Paris: E. Champion.Google Scholar
1934 L’indo-aryen du véda au temps moderne. Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve (English edition largely revised by the author and translated by Alfred Master, Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve, 1965).Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1993 Morphological and syntactic change in Late Middle Indo-Aryan. Journal of Indo-European Studies 21: 259-281.Google Scholar
1996 The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
1998 A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burrow, Thomas
1955 The Sanskrit Language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Busch, Allison
2010 Hidden in plain view: Brajbhasha poets at the Mughal court. Modern Asian Studies 44(2): 267-309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003 Argument realization in Punjabi. Workshop ‘Case, Valency and Transitivity’: Nijmegen, June 17-19, 2003.
2006 The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), 69-92. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora
2005 Evidential, raised possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(1): 1-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti K
1926 The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1960 Indo-Aryan and Hindi. Calcutta: Calcutta University.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978 Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-394. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
2005 Alignment of case marking. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 398-405. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dās, Śyāmasundara
(ed.) 1925 Rānī ketakī kī kahānī (of Iṁśā Allāha Khān). Vārāṇasī: Nāgarī Pracāriṇī Sabhā.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini & Sharma, Devyani
2006 Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3): 369-418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drocco, Andrea
2008 L’ergatività in hindī. Studio diacronico del processo di diffusione della posposizione ‘ne’. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2010 La concordanza verbale nelle costruzioni transitive al passato della braja-bhāṣā. In Tīrthayātrā. Essays in Honour of Stefano Piano, Pinuccia Caracchi, Antonella S. Comba, Alessandra Consolaro & Alberto Pelissero (eds), 161-185. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Eastwick, Edward B
(ed.) 1851 The Prem Ságar; or the Ocean of Love, Being a History of Kṛiṣhṇa, According to the Tenth Chapter of the Bhágavat of Vyásadev, Translated into Hindí from the Braj Bhákhá of Chaturbhuj Misr, by Lallú Lál, late Bhákhá Múnshí of the College of Fort William, A New Edition with a Vocabulary. Printed (for the Hon. East-India Company) by Stephen Austin, bookseller, etc., to the East India College, Hertford.
(ed.) 1855 The Baitál Pachísí; or, Twenty-five tales of a demon, by Mazhar ‘Alī Khāna Whā & Lallūjī Lāla. A new edition of the Hindí text, with each word expressed in the Hindústání character immediately under the corresponding word in the nágarí; and with a perfectly literal English interlinear translation, accompanied by a free translation in English at the foot of each page, and explanatory notes: by W. Burckhardt Barker, M.R.A.S., oriental interpreter; and Professor of Arabic, Turkish, Persian, and Hindústání languages at Eton. Hertford: Printed and published by Stephen Austin. Bookseller to the East India College.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1858 A Concise Grammar of the Hindustani Language, to which are added Selections for Reading. (2nd edn, enlarged, with a vocabulary, dialogues, twelve fac-similes of Persian and Devanagari writing, &c. by the Rev. George Small). London: Bernard Quaritch, Oriental Publisher.Google Scholar
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John
1988 Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 441-491. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
2005 The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9(1): 77-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Duncan
1855 A Grammar of the Hindústání Language in the Oriental and Roman Character, with Numerous Copper-plate Illustrations of the Persian and Devanágarí Systems of Alphabetic Writing: To Which is Added a Copious Selection of Easy Extracts for Reading, in the Persi-Arabic and Devanágarí Characters, Forming a Complete Introduction to the Totá-Kahání and Bágh-o-Bahár, Together with a Vocabulary of all the Words, and Various Explanatory Notes. London: Wm. H. Allen and Co.Google Scholar
1860 The Hindūstānī Manual: A Pocket-Companion for Those who Visit India in any Capacity; Intended to Facilitate the Essential Attainments of Conversing with Fluency and Composing with Accuracy in the most Useful of all the Languages Spoken in our Eastern Empire. In two Parts. Part I. – A Compendious Grammar of the Language. Part II. – A Vocabulary of Useful Words, English and Hindūstānī. (3rd edn, much enlarged and improved). London: Wm. H. Allen and Co.Google Scholar
Garcin de Tassy, Joseph H
1829 Rudiments de la Langue hindoustanie, à l’Usage des Élèves de l’École Royale et Spéciale des Langues Orientales Vivantes. Paris.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, John B
1796 A Grammar of the Hindoostanee Language, or Part Third of Volume First of a System of Hindoostanee Philology. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Gricourt, Marguerite
1988 Le Sab Ras de Vajhī (1634/35). Thèse de nouveau doctorat soutenue à l’Université Paris III (non publiée).
Haig, Geoffrey L.J
2008 Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawley, John S
1979 The early Sūr Sāgar and the growth of the Sūr tradition. Journal of the American Oriental Society 99(1): 64-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Sūr Dās. Poet, Singer, Saint. Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
2007 Braj: Fishing in Sur’s ocean. In Krishna. A Sourcebook, Edwin F. Bryant (ed. ), 223-240. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986 P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds.), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hoernle, A.F. Rudolf
1880 A Comparative Grammar of the Gauḍian (Aryo-Indian) Languages. Amsterdam: Philo Press.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E
1992 On identifying the conceptual restructuring of passive as ergative in Indo-Aryan. In Pāṇinian studies. Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, Madhav M. Deshpande & Saroja Bhate (eds), 177-199. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Hultzsch, Eugen
1924[1991] Inscriptions of Aśoka [Corpus Inscriptiorum Indicarum I]. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W
2000 Lurching towards ergativity: Expressions of agency in the Niya documents. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 63(1): 64-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Henry S
1893 A grammar of the Hindi language, rev. edn. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. (1990: reprinted from the 2nd edn).Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
1992 Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18: 71-97.Google Scholar
1995 The development of patient-oriented constructions in Late Western NIA Languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21: 15-54.Google Scholar
2001 Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages. Contact, Convergence and Typology, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 159-184. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
2006 Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. In Aspekty komparativistiki. Anna V. Dybo, Vladimir A. Dybo, Oleg A. Mudrak & George S. Starostin (eds), 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII).Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H
1978 Arguments against a passive origin of the IA ergative. Papers from the Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 14: 204-216.
1987 Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia. Lingua 71: 61-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liperovskij, Vladimir P
2007 Notes on the marking of actants in Braj (in comparison with Modern Standard Hindi). In Old and New Perspectives on S. Asian Languages: Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 144-152. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Monier-Williams, Monier
1860 Hindústání Primer; Containing a First Grammar Suited to Beginners and a Vocabulary of Common Words on Various Subjects. Together with Useful Phrases and Short Stories. London.Google Scholar
Montaut, Annie
2007 The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu, and the status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 365-385. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B
2009 Typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120: 1610–1636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Ronald S
1968 The Language of Indrajit of Orchā. A Study of early Braj Bhāsā prose. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1974 Hindi Literature of The Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nespital, Helmut
1998 The linguistic structure of Hindavī, Dakkhinī, Early Urdū and Early Khaṛī Bolī Hindī. Berliner Indologische Studien 11-12: 195-217.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari & Kachru, Yamuna
1977 Relational grammar, ergativity, and Hindi-Urdu. Lingua 41: 217-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John M
1998 Grammatical relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pirejko, Lija A
1979 On the genesis of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 481-488. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pischel, Richard
1965 A Grammar of the Prākrit Languages. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (2nd rev. edn, translated from German by Subhandra Jha).Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce R
1976 From passive to ergative in Indo-Aryan. In The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages, Manindra K. Verma (ed.), 195-211. Madison WI: Department of South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Price, William
1827-28 A new Grammar of the Hindoostanee Language, with Selections from the Best Authors, to Which are Added Familiar Phrases and Dialogues in the Proper Character. London.Google Scholar
Saksenā, Baburam
1971 The Evolution of Avadhi, 2nd edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Saulih, Mirza M. & Price, William
1823 A Grammar of the Three Principal Oriental Languages, Hindoostanee, Persian, and Arabic, to Which is Added, a Set of Persian Dialogues, Accompanied with an English Translation. London: Kingsbury, Parbury, and Allen.Google Scholar
Shakespear, John
1813 A Grammar of the Hindustani Language. London.Google Scholar
Sigorsky, Alexander A
2007 Case, split nominativity, split ergativity, and split accusativity in Hindi: A historical perspective. In Old and New Perspectives on S. Asian Languages: Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 34-61. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert, M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Śivprasad, Bábú
1870 Guṭaka or Selections. C. S. I. Benares: Printed at the Medical Hall Press.Google Scholar
Smith, John D
1975 An introduction to the language of the historical documents from Rajasthan. Modern Asian Studies 9(4): 433-464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell, Rupert
1992 The Hindi Classical Tradition. A Braj Bhāṣā Reader. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.Google Scholar
Śrīvāstav, Dayanand
1970 Historical Syntax of Early Hindi Prose. Calcutta: Atima Prakashan.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2009 On the origin and function of the ergative postposition in Hindī and its varieties. Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Annual of Oriental Studies) 62(1): 175-186.Google Scholar
2011 Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T
1983 The elimination of ergative patterns of case marking and verbal agreement in Modern Indic Languages. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 27: 140-164.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi P
1913 On the origin of the dative and genitive postpositions in Gujarati and Marwari. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 553-567.Google Scholar
1916 Notes on the Grammar of Old Western Rājasthānī with Special Reference to Apabhraṃça and to Gujarātī and Mārwāṛī. Bombay: Printed at the British India Press, Mazgaon. (Reprinted from the Indian Antiquary).Google Scholar
Varma, Dhirendra
1965 La langue Braj (avant-propos de Jules Bloch). Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2013 Alignment and Ergativity in New Indo-Aryan Languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic
2009 The rise of ergativity in Hindi: Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30: 1-24.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1981 Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 43-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, William
1827 Introduction to the Hindustani Language in Three Parts. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bubenik, Vit
2017. Uta Reinöhl: Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan . Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.