The restoration of the ergative case marking of ‘A’ in perfective clauses in New Indo-Aryan
The case of the Braj language*
The development of the ergative construction in the New Indo-Aryan period is still not totally clear. In particular we don’t know the process of grammaticalization of the new analytical ergative marker, the postposition ne, found, among others, in Hindī and Pañjābī. This study tries to demonstrate that if it is true that the “macro-history” of this form suggests that the discriminatory function of case marking is clearly important in the beginning of its process of diffusion and stabilization, it is also true that there is no single interpretation as regards its high initial variability. In fact, starting from data taken from prose texts written in the old Hindī literary variety known as Braj-bhās�ā, the full set of conditions on case alternations for A in the perfective aspect is really complex.
References (93)
References
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1986a. Die ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Aśoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99: 75-94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1986b. The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9-13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. On mechanism by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnot, Sandford. 1831. A New Self-instructing Grammar of the Hindustani Tongue, the Most Useful and General Language of British India, in the Oriental and Roman Character (With Appendix of Reading Exercises and Vocabulary). London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balbir, Nicole de Tugny. 1991. De Fort William au hindi littéraire: La transformation de la Khari boli en langue littéraire moderne au XIXe siècle. In Littératures médiévales de l’Inde du Nord, Françoise Mallison & Charlotte Vaudeville (eds), 187-204. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ballantyne, James R. 1838. Grammar of the Hindustani Language, with Grammatical Exercices. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barz, Richard K. 1976. The Bhakti Sect of Vallabhācārya. Faridabad: Thompson Press India.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barz, Richard K. 1982. A beginning in prose: Some steps in the emergence of modern Hindi literature. South Asia 5(1): 5-15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beames, John. 1872-1879. A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India. London: Trubner & Co. (reprint 1966, Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhardwaj, Mangat R. 1995. Colloquial Panjabi. A Complete Language Course. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Tej K. 1981. The treatment of transitivity in the Hindi grammatical tradition. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11(2): 195-208.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Tej K. 1987. A History of the Hindi Grammatical Tradition. Hindi-Hindustani Grammar, Grammarians, History and Problems. Leiden: E. J. Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Tej K. 1993. Punjabi. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Tej K. 2000. Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Punjabi. In Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology, Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), 637-715. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloch, Jules. 1906. La phrase nominale en sanskrit [Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique XIV]. Paris: Honoré Champion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloch, Jules. 1920. La formation de la langue marathe. Paris: E. Champion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloch, Jules. 1934. L’indo-aryen du véda au temps moderne. Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve (English edition largely revised by the author and translated by Alfred Master, Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve, 1965).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bubenik, Vit. 1993. Morphological and syntactic change in Late Middle Indo-Aryan. Journal of Indo-European Studies 21: 259-281.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bubenik, Vit. 1996. The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burrow, Thomas. 1955. The Sanskrit Language. London: Faber & Faber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Busch, Allison. 2010. Hidden in plain view: Brajbhasha poets at the Mughal court. Modern Asian Studies 44(2): 267-309. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam. 2003. Argument realization in Punjabi. Workshop ‘Case, Valency and Transitivity’: Nijmegen, June 17-19, 2003.
Butt, Miriam. 2006. The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), 69-92. The Hague: Thesus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bynon, Theodora. 2005. Evidential, raised possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(1): 1-72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatterji, Suniti K. 1926. The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatterji, Suniti K. 1960. Indo-Aryan and Hindi. Calcutta: Calcutta University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-394. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 2005. Alignment of case marking. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 398-405. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dās, Śyāmasundara. (ed.) 1925. Rānī ketakī kī kahānī (of Iṁśā Allāha Khān). Vārāṇasī: Nāgarī Pracāriṇī Sabhā.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deo, Ashwini & Sharma, Devyani. 2006. Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3): 369-418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drocco, Andrea. 2008. L’ergatività in hindī. Studio diacronico del processo di diffusione della posposizione ‘ne’. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drocco, Andrea. 2010. La concordanza verbale nelle costruzioni transitive al passato della braja-bhāṣā. In Tīrthayātrā. Essays in Honour of Stefano Piano, Pinuccia Caracchi, Antonella S. Comba, Alessandra Consolaro & Alberto Pelissero (eds), 161-185. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eastwick, Edward B. (ed.). 1851. The Prem Ságar; or the Ocean of Love, Being a History of Kṛiṣhṇa, According to the Tenth Chapter of the Bhágavat of Vyásadev, Translated into Hindí from the Braj Bhákhá of Chaturbhuj Misr, by Lallú Lál, late Bhákhá Múnshí of the College of Fort William, A New Edition with a Vocabulary. Printed (for the Hon. East-India Company) by Stephen Austin, bookseller, etc., to the East India College, Hertford.
Eastwick, Edward B. (ed.). 1855. The Baitál Pachísí; or, Twenty-five tales of a demon, by Mazhar ‘Alī Khāna Whā & Lallūjī Lāla. A new edition of the Hindí text, with each word expressed in the Hindústání character immediately under the corresponding word in the nágarí; and with a perfectly literal English interlinear translation, accompanied by a free translation in English at the foot of each page, and explanatory notes: by W. Burckhardt Barker, M.R.A.S., oriental interpreter; and Professor of Arabic, Turkish, Persian, and Hindústání languages at Eton. Hertford: Printed and published by Stephen Austin. Bookseller to the East India College.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eastwick, Edward B. (ed.). 1858. A Concise Grammar of the Hindustani Language, to which are added Selections for Reading. (2nd edn, enlarged, with a vocabulary, dialogues, twelve fac-similes of Persian and Devanagari writing, &c. by the Rev. George Small). London: Bernard Quaritch, Oriental Publisher.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9(1): 77-113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forbes, Duncan. 1855. A Grammar of the Hindústání Language in the Oriental and Roman Character, with Numerous Copper-plate Illustrations of the Persian and Devanágarí Systems of Alphabetic Writing: To Which is Added a Copious Selection of Easy Extracts for Reading, in the Persi-Arabic and Devanágarí Characters, Forming a Complete Introduction to the Totá-Kahání and Bágh-o-Bahár, Together with a Vocabulary of all the Words, and Various Explanatory Notes. London: Wm. H. Allen and Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forbes, Duncan. 1860. The Hindūstānī Manual: A Pocket-Companion for Those who Visit India in any Capacity; Intended to Facilitate the Essential Attainments of Conversing with Fluency and Composing with Accuracy in the most Useful of all the Languages Spoken in our Eastern Empire. In two Parts. Part I. – A Compendious Grammar of the Language. Part II. – A Vocabulary of Useful Words, English and Hindūstānī. (3rd edn, much enlarged and improved). London: Wm. H. Allen and Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcin de Tassy, Joseph H. 1829. Rudiments de la Langue hindoustanie, à l’Usage des Élèves de l’École Royale et Spéciale des Langues Orientales Vivantes. Paris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilchrist, John B. 1796. A Grammar of the Hindoostanee Language, or Part Third of Volume First of a System of Hindoostanee Philology. Calcutta.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gricourt, Marguerite. 1988. Le Sab Ras de Vajhī (1634/35). Thèse de nouveau doctorat soutenue à l’Université Paris III (non publiée).
Haig, Geoffrey L.J. 2008. Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawley, John S. 1979. The early Sūr Sāgar and the growth of the Sūr tradition. Journal of the American Oriental Society 99(1): 64-72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawley, John S. 1984. Sūr Dās. Poet, Singer, Saint. Delhi: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawley, John S. 2007. Braj: Fishing in Sur’s ocean. In Krishna. A Sourcebook, Edwin F. Bryant (ed. ), 223-240. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds.), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoernle, A.F. Rudolf. 1880. A Comparative Grammar of the Gauḍian (Aryo-Indian) Languages. Amsterdam: Philo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hook, Peter E. 1992. On identifying the conceptual restructuring of passive as ergative in Indo-Aryan. In Pāṇinian studies. Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, Madhav M. Deshpande & Saroja Bhate (eds), 177-199. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hultzsch, Eugen. 1924[1991]. Inscriptions of Aśoka [Corpus Inscriptiorum Indicarum I]. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jamison, Stephanie W. 2000. Lurching towards ergativity: Expressions of agency in the Niya documents. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 63(1): 64-80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kellogg, Henry S. 1893. A grammar of the Hindi language, rev. edn. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. (1990: reprinted from the 2nd edn).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 1992. Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18: 71-97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 1995. The development of patient-oriented constructions in Late Western NIA Languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21: 15-54.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 2001. Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages. Contact, Convergence and Typology, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 159-184. New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 2006. Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. In Aspekty komparativistiki. Anna V. Dybo, Vladimir A. Dybo, Oleg A. Mudrak & George S. Starostin (eds), 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1978. Arguments against a passive origin of the IA ergative.
Papers from the Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society
14: 204-216.
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1987. Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia. Lingua 71: 61-102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liperovskij, Vladimir P. 2007. Notes on the marking of actants in Braj (in comparison with Modern Standard Hindi). In Old and New Perspectives on S. Asian Languages: Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 144-152. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monier-Williams, Monier. 1860. Hindústání Primer; Containing a First Grammar Suited to Beginners and a Vocabulary of Common Words on Various Subjects. Together with Useful Phrases and Short Stories. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montaut, Annie. 2007. The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu, and the status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 365-385. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B. 2009. Typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B. 2010. Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120: 1610–1636. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, Ronald S. 1968. The Language of Indrajit of Orchā. A Study of early Braj Bhāsā prose. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, Ronald S. 1974. Hindi Literature of The Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespital, Helmut. 1998. The linguistic structure of Hindavī, Dakkhinī, Early Urdū and Early Khaṛī Bolī Hindī. Berliner Indologische Studien 11-12: 195-217.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari & Kachru, Yamuna. 1977. Relational grammar, ergativity, and Hindi-Urdu. Lingua 41: 217-238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, John M. 1998. Grammatical relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pirejko, Lija A. 1979. On the genesis of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 481-488. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pischel, Richard. 1965. A Grammar of the Prākrit Languages. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (2nd rev. edn, translated from German by Subhandra Jha).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pray, Bruce R. 1976. From passive to ergative in Indo-Aryan. In The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages, Manindra K. Verma (ed.), 195-211. Madison WI: Department of South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, William. 1827-28. A new Grammar of the Hindoostanee Language, with Selections from the Best Authors, to Which are Added Familiar Phrases and Dialogues in the Proper Character. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saksenā, Baburam. 1971. The Evolution of Avadhi, 2nd edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saulih, Mirza M. & Price, William. 1823. A Grammar of the Three Principal Oriental Languages, Hindoostanee, Persian, and Arabic, to Which is Added, a Set of Persian Dialogues, Accompanied with an English Translation. London: Kingsbury, Parbury, and Allen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shakespear, John. 1813. A Grammar of the Hindustani Language. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigorsky, Alexander A. 2007. Case, split nominativity, split ergativity, and split accusativity in Hindi: A historical perspective. In Old and New Perspectives on S. Asian Languages: Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 34-61. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert, M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Śivprasad, Bábú. 1870. Guṭaka or Selections. C. S. I. Benares: Printed at the Medical Hall Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, John D. 1975. An introduction to the language of the historical documents from Rajasthan. Modern Asian Studies 9(4): 433-464. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snell, Rupert. 1992. The Hindi Classical Tradition. A Braj Bhāṣā Reader. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Śrīvāstav, Dayanand. 1970. Historical Syntax of Early Hindi Prose. Calcutta: Atima Prakashan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2009. On the origin and function of the ergative postposition in Hindī and its varieties. Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Annual of Oriental Studies) 62(1): 175-186.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2011. Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, Gregory T. 1983. The elimination of ergative patterns of case marking and verbal agreement in Modern Indic Languages. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 27: 140-164.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tessitori, Luigi P. 1913. On the origin of the dative and genitive postpositions in Gujarati and Marwari. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 553-567.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tessitori, Luigi P. 1916. Notes on the Grammar of Old Western Rājasthānī with Special Reference to Apabhraṃça and to Gujarātī and Mārwāṛī. Bombay: Printed at the British India Press, Mazgaon. (Reprinted from the Indian Antiquary).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varma, Dhirendra 1965. La langue Braj (avant-propos de Jules Bloch). Paris: Maisonneuve.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verbeke, Saartje 2013. Alignment and Ergativity in New Indo-Aryan Languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2009. The rise of ergativity in Hindi: Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30: 1-24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1981. Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 43-80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yates, William 1827. Introduction to the Hindustani Language in Three Parts. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bubenik, Vit
2017.
Uta Reinöhl: Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan
.
Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1
► pp. 363 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.