Cover not available
Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 13–42

Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure

Convergence and divergence

| University of Mainz

The correlation between finiteness and nominalization is frequently discussed in the literature. This paper will introduce information structure as a third factor that has an important impact on processes of grammaticalization. Nominalized verb forms can be used in the formation of relative clauses and clefting. With these functions, they can become part of focus constructions. At a subsequent stage, they are reanalyzed either as finite forms with tense-aspect functions or as markers of stance. With the integration of the focus function of nominalized verb forms, a considerable part of what is described as insubordination (Evans 2007) can be explained in terms of a grammaticalization process, moving from the use in a focus construction to the reanalysis as a finite form.

Keywords: clefting, grammaticalization, information structure, insubordination, nominalization, relative clause
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.02bis
References
Adger, David
2007 Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 24-58. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Beffa, Marie-Lise & Hamayon, Roberte
1975 Eléments de grammaire mongole. Paris: Dunot, Documents de linguistique quantitative.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1989 Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93-124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2004 Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5: 107-136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1999 Nominalization and focus constructions in some Kiranti languages. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, 271-96. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1995 Verb serialization and converbs—differences and similarities. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Ekkehard König & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 137-188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998 Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul Hopper (eds), 13-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Finite vs. non finite languages. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1400-1413. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 115-137. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008 Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech—the case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language 32: 568-589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 On the evolution of complexity—sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 34-49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle
2010 Informational and referential hierarchy. Clause-linking strategies in Austronesian-Oceanic languages. In Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 269-311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corston-Oliver, Simon H
1996 Ergativity in Roviana, Solomon Islands [Pacific Linguistics B-113]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2002 Roviana. In The Oceanic Languages, John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley (eds), 467-497. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1990 Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1978 Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564-589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1998 Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera & Donall P. Ó Baoill (eds), 335-419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
1986 Japanese [Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars Series]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
2008 The grammaticalization of nominalizers in Japanese and Korean. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 169-187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalinina, Elena & Sumbatova, Nina
2007 Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 183-249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É
1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
2007 Verbal and nominalized finite clauses in Turkish. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 305-32. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1988 Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sarah G. Thompson (eds), 181-225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A
1972 Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1, John P. Kimball (ed.), 237-257. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta
2007 Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671-714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997 Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. In Honor of T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373-394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane
2010 Converbs and adverbial clauses in Badaga, a South-Dravidian language. In Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 165-202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1970 Mongolian Language Handbook. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G
1995 Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D
2002 Takia. In The Oceanic Languages, John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley (eds), 216-248. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Senderjav, Alimaa
2003 Parataktische Teilsätze im Khalkha-Mongolischen verso hypotaktische Teilsätze im Deutschen. Ein Beitrag zur Sprachlehrforschung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Staalsen, P
1972 Clause relationships in Iatmul. Pacific Linguistics A.31: 45-69.Google Scholar
Street, John C
1963 Khalkha Structure [Research and Studies in Uralic and Altaic Languages, Project No. 25]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Vietze, Hans-Peter
1974 Lehrbuch der mongolischen Sprache. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Von Heusinger, Klaus, Klein, Udo & Guntsetseg, Dolgor
2011 The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian. Lingua 121: 48-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foon Ha & Matthews, Stephen
2008 The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 309-341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
2016. Chapter 1. The dynamics of insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Fanxi
2021. On the conditional marker “zhě”(者). International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Robbeets, Martine
2017. The development of finiteness in the Transeurasian languages . Linguistics 55:3 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.