Cover not available
Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 141–170

On the tightrope between infinitives and action nouns

The case of Otomi nominalizations

| SeDyL (UMR-8202), CNRS
In this paper, I study the distribution of two nominalization structures in two closely related Amerindian languages of Mexico (Eastern Otomi and Northern Otomi). The structures involve intransitive nominalizations depicting a customary activity performed by humans (‘hunting’, ‘sowing’, etc.) as they appear in a complementation frame. I address the question of whether these nominalization structures in Otomi are morphologically non-finite forms or are just nouns. I show how a cognate structure in two close languages can be found in the two opposing ends of a nominalization scale: in Eastern Otomi, the structure is inflectional and should be analyzed as an intransitive infinitive, while its equivalent in Northern Otomi should be seen as an action deverbal noun.
Keywords: action noun, complement, deverbal noun, infinitive, Otomi
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.07pal
References (24)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Can Pinxabaj, Telma. 2009. Morphosyntactic Features and Behavior of Verbal Nouns in K’ichee’. MA thesis, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
de Cárceres, Fray Pedro. 1907[1580?]. Arte de la lengua otomí. In Boletín del Instituto Bibliográfico Mexicano, Nicolás León (ed.). Mexico: Instituto Bibliográfico Mexicano.Google Scholar
Carochi, Horacio. [1645]1983. Arte de la lengua mexicana con la declaracion de los adverbios della. Edición facsimilar de la publicada por Juan Ruys en la Ciudad de México 1645, con un estudio introductorio de Miguel León-Portilla [Facsímiles de Lingüística y Filología Nahuas: 2]. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra. 2007. Nominalizations. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334-381. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. 1985. Tzutujil Grammar [University of California Publications in Linguistics 107]. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Echegoyen, Artemisa & Voigtlander, Katherine. 2007. Diccionario Yuhú: Otomí de la Sierra Madre Oriental (Estados de Hidalgo, Puebla y Veracruz, México). Versión Preliminar; Serie de Vocabularios y Diccionarios Indígenas. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
England, Nora. 1983. A Grammar of Mam, a Mayan Language. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hernández Cruz, Luis, Torquemada, Moisés Victoria, & Sinclair Crawford, Donaldo (eds). 2004. Diccionario del hñähñu (otomí) del Valle de Mezquital, Estado de Hidalgo [Vocabularios Indígenas 45]. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 2001. Unidad y diversidad de la lengua: Relatos otomíes. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Autónoma Nacional de México.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1999. Nominalizations. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, Keith Brown & Jim Miller (eds), 248-252. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2007. Introduction. In Finiteness: Empirical and Theoretical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2011. The conjugations of Colonial Otomi. Transactions of the Philological Society 109: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Subordination and juxtaposition. In Clause Combining in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Data-Driven Approaches to Cross-Clausal Syntax, Volker Gast & Holger Diesel (eds), 37-76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Polian, Gilles. 2013. Infinitivos transitivos: Innovaciones del tseltal en la familia maya. In Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamerica, Enrique L. Palancar & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds), 339-380. Mexico: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Romero Méndez, Rodrigo. 2013. Cláusulas de complemento en el mixe de Ayutla: Una aproximación a sus tipos morfosintácticos. In Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamerica, Enrique L. Palancar & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds), 217-246. Mexico: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Salinas Pedraza, Jesús. 1983. Etnografía del Otomí. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. Towards a typology of complement control. In Studies in Complement Control, Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 1-80. Berlin: ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47.Google Scholar
Voigtlander, Katherine & Echegoyen, Artemisa. 1979 [1985]. Luces contemporáneas del otomí: Gramática del otomí de la sierra. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
. 2007. Gramática del yuhú: Otomí de la Sierra Madre Oriental. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. Ms.Google Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús. 2007. Los tres tipos de estructuras de complemento en chol. In Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages Latino-América III . <[URL]>
. 2013. Dos tipos de cláusulas no finitas en chol. In Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamerica, Enrique L. Palancar & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds), 77-102. Mexico: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1990. Syntactic representations and phonological shapes. In The Phonology-Syntax Connection, Sharon Inkelas & D. Zec (eds), 379-397. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar