Cover not available
Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 171–204

Referential markers in Oceanic nominalized constructions

| UMR 7107 LACITO-CNRS
Nominalized constructions are a very frequent phenomenon in Oceanic languages, used in nominal, relative, or imperative clauses as arguments, adjuncts, or the prototypical expression of exclamations. I provide evidence that contrary to widespread views, tense, negation, and aspect markers do occur in nominalizations. I then examine restrictions on the occurrence of these markers, as well as of some articles, and try to find historical explanations. Lastly, I show that hierarchical constraints often formulated for nominalization and deverbalization processes do not fully apply to Oceanic languages, since the occurrence of tense and aspect markers is not only attested in lexical nominalizations but is also quite frequent in phrasal and clausal nominalizations, that is, at the syntactic and discourse levels as well.
Keywords: Oceanic languages, phrasal/clausal nominalizations, restrictions on negative markers, restrictions on referential markers, typological implication
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.08moy
References (41)
References
Bauer, Winifred. 1997. The Reed Reference Grammar of Māori. Auckland: Reed Books.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 2000. Tuvaluan: A Polynesian Language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle. 2002. Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Analyse syntaxique et sémantique [Langues et cultures du Pacifique 16]. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1973. The syntax of nominalizations in Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics 12: 641-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ross. 1981. Inside and outside Polynesian nominalizations. In Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs, J. Hollyman & Andrew Pawley (eds), 65-81. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of action nominals: A cross-linguistic study. Lingua 40: 177-201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra. 2007 [1985]. Lexical nominalizations. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334-81. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2012. Communication on “Polyfunctional nominalizations in Tibeto-Birman: Trajectories of grammaticalization,” Paris, June 6.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1988. A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Du Feu, Veronica. 1996. Rapanui. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elbert, Samuel H. & Schütz, Samuel. 1988. Echo of a Culture: A Grammar of Rennell and Bellona [Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 22]. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 110-181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even, Hoëm, Ingjerd, Iosefo, Consulata Mahina & Vonen, Arnfinn Muruvik. 1989. A Handbook of the Tokelau Language [The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, Series B, No. 77]. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Catriona. 2001. The Lolovoli Dialect of the North-East Ambae Language. Vanuatu [Pacific Linguistics 515]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hooper, Robin, 1996. Type and instance nominalisations in Tokelauan. In Oceanic Studies: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Oceanic Linguistics [Pacific Linguistics C-133], John Lynch & Pat Fa'afo (eds), 223-241. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2011. Exclamatives and temporal nominalizations in Austronesian. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 721-753. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krupa, Viktor. 2005. Syntax of verbal nouns in Marquesan. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2): 505-516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert & Peltzer, Louise. 2000. Structure de la langue tahitienne [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 15]. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A Grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Nominalizations in Toqabaqita and closely related languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta, & Janick Wrona (eds), 685-720. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2005. Remarks on deverbalization. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 58: 97-110.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Hovdhaugen, Even. 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 1995. Le xârâcùù, langue de Thio-Canala (Nouvelle-Calédonie) Éléments de syntaxe [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 10]. Paris: Peeters-Selaf.Google Scholar
. 1997. Grammaire du futunien. Nouméa: Centre de Documentation Pédagogique.Google Scholar
. 2007. Les formes nominalisées du verbe dans quelques langues océaniennes. Faits de langues 30: 97-116.Google Scholar
. 2011. Nominalisation and exclamation in Oceanic languages. In Topics in Oceanic Morphosyntax, Claire Moyse-Faurie & Joachim Sabel (eds), 135-60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Te lea faka'uvea / Le wallisien [Les Langues du Monde, 7]. Peeters.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild & Hovdhaugen, Even. 2011. A Grammar of Vaeakau-Taumako. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 42-141. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1997. Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givón. Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373-394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise. 1984. Dictionnaire Iaai-Français (Ouvéa, Nouvelle-Calédonie) [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 6]. Paris: Peeters-Selaf.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill. 2009. Kokota Grammar [Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 35]. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Rivierre, Jean-Claude. 1980. La langue de Touho. Phonologie et grammaire du cèmuhî (Nouvelle-Calédonie) [Langues et Civilisations à Tradition Orale 38]. Paris: Selaf.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Pawley, Andrew & Reid, Lawrence. 1982. The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travelers [Pacific Linguistics Series C-75], Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds), 145-170. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas. 2006. A Grammar of South Efate: An Oceanic Language of Vanuatu [Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 33]. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Vernaudon Jacques & Rigo, Bernard. 2004. De la translation substantivante à la quantification: vers une caractérisation sémantique de l'article te en tahitien. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 99: 457-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vonen, Arnfinn Muruvik. 1993. Parts of Speech and Linguistic Typology. Oslo: University of Oslo Press.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Matthews, Stephen. 2008. The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria Jose López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 309-341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar