Cover not available
Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 323–344

The Manner converb in Beja (Cushitic) and its refinitization

| LLACAN (CNRS, INALCO, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité)

This paper focuses on the formal properties and uses of nonfinite constructions in Beja (Cushitic) with the Manner converb, and its refinitization as a Perfect paradigm. The analysis is carried out against the background of typological studies on converbs and copredicative constructions. This converb functions at several levels of juncture: predicate in deranked adverbial clauses, in complement and relative clauses for the encoding of inter-clausal relations; adverb and cognate object at the level of the verb phrase; verbal adjective in copredicative and attributive constructions at the level of the verb and noun phrases. The different uses and values in verbal periphrastic constructions (emphasis, volition), and the grammaticalization as a finite verb form (Perfect) in main and independent clauses, are also analyzed. A participial origin of the Manner converb is proposed on typological grounds alone, because of lack of Afroasiatic comparative evidence, with three different grammaticalization paths, one for each level of juncture, where nominal morphosyntax played a crucial role in the refinitization process.

Keywords: Beja, converb, copredication, grammaticalization, perfect, periphrastic constructions
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.13van
References
Almkvist, Herman
1881-85 Die Bischari-Sprache Tū-Beḍāwie in Nordost-Afrika. Upsala: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Upsala.Google Scholar
Appleyard, David
2007 Beja morphology. In Morphologies of Asia and Africa, Alan S. Kaye (ed.), 447-480. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Azeb, Amha
2001 The Maale Language. Leiden: Research School CNWS, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Azeb, Amha & Dimmendaal, Gerrit
2006 Converbs in an African perspective. In Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 393-440. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Banti, Giorgio
2007 Remarks on the typology of converbs and their functional equivalents in East-Cushitic. In Converbs, Medial Verbs, Clause Chaining and Related Issues [Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 19], Sascha Völlmin, Azeb Amha, Christian J. Rapold & Silvia Zaugg-Coretti (eds), 31-80. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1995 Verb serialization and converbs – differences and similarities. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 137-188.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis & Gaudefroy-Demombynes, Maurice
1975 Grammaire de l’arabe classique. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen
1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems. Studies in Language 13: 51-103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David
1972 La mutation aspectivo-temporelle dans quelques langues couchitiques et le système verbal chamito-sémitique. In Langues et Techniques, Nature et Société, Jacqueline Thomas & Lucien Bernot (eds), 57-63. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1973 Le renouvellement de l’inaccompli en bédawiye. Comptes Rendus du GLECS 14: 69-78.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Eva
2007 Head and Dependent Indexing within the Phrase: Towards a Typology, with Special Reference to Beja. BA thesis, University of Melbourne.
Gragg, Gene 1976 Oromo of Wellega. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, Lionel M. Bender (ed.), 166-195. East Lansing MI: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de
1995 The Hungarian converb or verbal adverbial in -va/ -ve . In Haspelmath & König (eds), 283-311.Google Scholar
Halmøy, Jane-Odile
1982 Le gérondif. Eléments pour une description syntaxique et sémantique [Contributions Norvégiennes aux Etudes Romanes 6]. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Hamid Ahmed, Mohamed-Tahir
2013 Les articles définis en bedja, dialecte du Gash. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Paris, 16-18 April 2008 , Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle & Martine Vanhove (eds), 175-180. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Haspelmath, Martin
1995a The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 1-55.Google Scholar
1995b Contextual and specialized converbs in Lezgian. In Martin Haspelmath & König (eds), 415-440.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard
(eds) 1995 Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participle, Gerunds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A
1976 Beja. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, Lionel Bender (ed.), 97-132. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, African Studies Center.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1995 The meaning of converb constructions. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 57-95.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1995 Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 189-237.Google Scholar
Maslov, Juri S
1988 Resultative, perfect and aspect. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 63-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Didier
1995 “Des paroles douces comme la soie”. Introduction aux contes dans l’aire couchitique (bedja, afar, saho, somali). Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Munzinger, Werner
1864 Ostafrikanische Studien. Basel: Schaffhausen: F. HurterGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V
1995 Converbs in Evenki. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 441-463.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P
1995 Some typological parameters of converbs. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 97-136.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Y. Jaxontov
1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 3-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1978 Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 114-127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1985 Prädikativ und Koprädikativ. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 13 (2): 154-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusch, Luise F
1980 Kontrastive Untersuchungen zum italienischen ‘Gerundio’. Instrumental- und Modalsätze und das Problem der Individuierung von Ereignissen [Linguistische Arbeiten 69]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, Leo
1893-94 Die Beḍauye-Sprache in Nordost-Afrika, Vols. 1-3 [Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien L, Vol. 128]. Vienna: Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Google Scholar
Roper, E.M
1928 Tu Beḍawiɛ. An Elementary Handbook for the Use of Sudan Government Officials. Hertford: Stephen Austin.Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine
2008 Enoncés hiérarchisés, converbes et prosodie en bedja. In Subordination, dépendance et parataxe dans les langues africaines, Bernard Caron (ed.), 83-103. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2014a The Beja Corpus. In A. Mettouchi & C. Chanard (eds), The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b Beja Grammatical Sketch. In A. Mettouchi & C. Chanard (eds), The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. 68 pages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar