Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 323344
References (36)
References
Almkvist, Herman. 1881-85. Die Bischari-Sprache Tū-Beḍāwie in Nordost-Afrika. Upsala: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Upsala.Google Scholar
Appleyard, David. 2007. Beja morphology. In Morphologies of Asia and Africa, Alan S. Kaye (ed.), 447-480. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Azeb, Amha. 2001. The Maale Language. Leiden: Research School CNWS, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Azeb, Amha & Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2006. Converbs in an African perspective. In Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 393-440. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Banti, Giorgio. 2007. Remarks on the typology of converbs and their functional equivalents in East-Cushitic. In Converbs, Medial Verbs, Clause Chaining and Related Issues [Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 19], Sascha Völlmin, Azeb Amha, Christian J. Rapold & Silvia Zaugg-Coretti (eds), 31-80. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1995. Verb serialization and converbs – differences and similarities. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 137-188.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis & Gaudefroy-Demombynes, Maurice. 1975. Grammaire de l’arabe classique. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems. Studies in Language 13: 51-103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David. 1972. La mutation aspectivo-temporelle dans quelques langues couchitiques et le système verbal chamito-sémitique. In Langues et Techniques, Nature et Société, Jacqueline Thomas & Lucien Bernot (eds), 57-63. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
. 1973. Le renouvellement de l’inaccompli en bédawiye. Comptes Rendus du GLECS 14: 69-78.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Eva. 2007. Head and Dependent Indexing within the Phrase: Towards a Typology, with Special Reference to Beja. BA thesis, University of Melbourne.
Gragg, Gene. 1976. Oromo of Wellega. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, Lionel M. Bender (ed.), 166-195. East Lansing MI: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de. 1995. The Hungarian converb or verbal adverbial in -va/ -ve . In Haspelmath & König (eds), 283-311.Google Scholar
Halmøy, Jane-Odile. 1982. Le gérondif. Eléments pour une description syntaxique et sémantique [Contributions Norvégiennes aux Etudes Romanes 6]. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Hamid Ahmed, Mohamed-Tahir. 2013. Les articles définis en bedja, dialecte du Gash. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Paris, 16-18 April 2008 , Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle & Martine Vanhove (eds), 175-180. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995a. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 1-55.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Contextual and specialized converbs in Lezgian. In Martin Haspelmath & König (eds), 415-440.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard (eds). 1995. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participle, Gerunds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1976. Beja. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, Lionel Bender (ed.), 97-132. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, African Studies Center.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1995. The meaning of converb constructions. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 57-95.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1995. Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 189-237.Google Scholar
Maslov, Juri S. 1988. Resultative, perfect and aspect. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 63-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Didier. 1995. “Des paroles douces comme la soie”. Introduction aux contes dans l’aire couchitique (bedja, afar, saho, somali). Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Munzinger, Werner. 1864. Ostafrikanische Studien. Basel: Schaffhausen: F. HurterGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V. 1995. Converbs in Evenki. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 441-463.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1995. Some typological parameters of converbs. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 97-136.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Y. Jaxontov. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 3-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1978. Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 114-127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1985. Prädikativ und Koprädikativ. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 13 (2): 154-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusch, Luise F. 1980. Kontrastive Untersuchungen zum italienischen ‘Gerundio’. Instrumental- und Modalsätze und das Problem der Individuierung von Ereignissen [Linguistische Arbeiten 69]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, Leo. 1893-94. Die Beḍauye-Sprache in Nordost-Afrika, Vols. 1-3 [Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien L, Vol. 128]. Vienna: Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Google Scholar
Roper, E.M. 1928. Tu Beḍawiɛ. An Elementary Handbook for the Use of Sudan Government Officials. Hertford: Stephen Austin.Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2008. Enoncés hiérarchisés, converbes et prosodie en bedja. In Subordination, dépendance et parataxe dans les langues africaines, Bernard Caron (ed.), 83-103. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2014a. The Beja Corpus. In A. Mettouchi & C. Chanard (eds), The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Beja Grammatical Sketch. In A. Mettouchi & C. Chanard (eds), The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. 68 pages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar