Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 171182
References
Abdulaev, Arsen K. & Abdullaev, Isa K
2010Cezyas Folklor (Tsez folklore). Makhachkala: Lotos.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria
2007Evidentials in Tsez. In L’énonciation médiatisée II: Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: Illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes, Zlatka Guentchéva & Jon Landaburu (eds), 335–350. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2009Participles and finiteness: The case of Akhvakh. Linguistic Discovery 7(1): 106–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2009Finiteness in Hinuq. Linguistic Discovery 9(2): 3-29.Google Scholar
2011Evidentiality and new media in the Caucasus – the case of Hinuq. In Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Lutz Marten & David Nathan (eds), 101–110. London: University of London.Google Scholar
2012The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46: 75–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aA Grammar of Hinuq [Mouton Grammar Library 63]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bHinuq verb forms and finiteness. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66(1): 69–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The grammar of knowledge in Hinuq. In The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 52–68. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie, Goncalves, Michael, Polinsky, Maria & Radkevich, Nina
2014The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez. Lingua 150: 137–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imnajšvili, David S
1963Didojskij jazyk v sravnenii s ginuxskim i xvaršijskim jazykami (The Dido [Tsez] language in comparison with the Hinuq and Khwarshi languages). Tbilisi: Izdatel´stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Kalinina, Elena & Sumbatova, Nina
2007Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 184–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin
1998On patient demotion in Lak. In Typology of Verbal Categories: Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday [Linguistische Arbeiten 382], Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 95–115. Tübingen: Niemeyer CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I
2001Umen´šenie perexodnosti: binominativnaja konstrukcija. In Bagvalinskij jazyk, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 394–399. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I. & Testelec, Jakov G
1999Struktura sostavljajuščix. In Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 314–346. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira
2009A Grammar of Khwarshi [Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap 234].Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2011Evidentiality in Tsezic languages. Linguistic Discovery 9(2): 30–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2010Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12): 1176–1189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Gianpaolo
1987Syntactic restructuring in the evolution of Romance auxiliaries. In Historical Development of Auxiliaries [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 35], Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds), 225–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Helma
1995A Grammar of Hunzib (with Texts and Lexicon) [Lincom Studies in Caucasian Linguistics 01]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.