Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 183–208

Chapter 8. Ordinary insubordination as transient discourse

| University of Kansas, Anthropology
Insubordination – the conventionalized use of morphologically non-finite forms as finite ones – is an ordinary syntactic event in synchronic spontaneous discourse; it is also an ordinary stage of the grammaticalization of non-finite clauses as finite ones. This chapter explores the morphosyntactic typology of insubordination and its ontogeny in Inner Asian Turko-Mongolic languages. In so doing, I clarify criterial features of insubordination. I also consider whether insubordination is a transient phenomenon as part of a larger process of grammaticalization.I hypothesize that spoken interactive discourse is the major source of candidate structures for insubordination. Inner Asian Turko-Mongolic insubordination occurs in cross-linguistically typical if-clauses, but it also occurs in several other morphologically nonfinite contexts such as purposive clauses (e.g. Uyghur …üčün ‘in order to…’), imperfective clauses (e.g. Southeastern Monguor …bari-ǰi ‘taking…’). I first survey the range of conventionalized insubordinate readings of such non-finites in a half dozen modern Turko-Mongolic languages. Turning to their ontogeny, I then show how contemporary examples of candidate utterances for insubordination often originate as co-constructed utterances in discourse.The grammaticalization of nonfinite clauses as finite ones is a well-established phenomenon in Turkic and Mongolic. Looking at clause length, frequency, and recoverability of semantic content, some conventionalized examples of insubordination (for instance the Monguor imperfective clauses with -ǰi) are losing an insubordination reading and becoming grammaticalized as finite utterances. If insubordination criterially entails semantic and grammatical elision, such constructions become independent in the final phase of insubordination, and “it may not be possible to restore any ellipsed material” (Evans 2007: 370–376). But if insubordination is viewed as a short-term, discourse-based and fundamentally transient phenomenon, then Monguor imperfective nonfinites would be seen as “mature” examples of insubordination. Social and regional variation and even language contact contribute to the introduction of new candidates for insubordination, as well as for their loss.
Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.08dwy
References
Bybee, Joan
2002 Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14, 261–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1991 Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian. In Traugott & Heine (eds), Vol.1, 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M
2013 Desinicizing Modern Uyghur. Ms.Google Scholar
2011–2015 Interactive Inner Asia. NSF-BCS 1065524. https://​iaia​.ittc​.ku​.eduGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A
1986 Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353–372. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Tom
2009 Multiple routes to clause union: The diachrony of complex verb phrases. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Tom Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 81–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984 Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott & Heine (eds), Vol.1, 17–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1894/1909 Progress in Language with Special Reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982 Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48.1]. Köln: Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2003 A Grammar of Kolyma Yukhagir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCreedy, Lynn
1989 Cohesion and discourse structure in three genres of Navajo discourse. In Athabaskan Linguistics: Current Perspectives on a Language Family, Eung-Do Cook & Keren Rice (eds), 439–486. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H
(ed.) 1933 Volkskundliche Texte aus Ost-Türkistan. Aus dem Nachlass von N. Th. Katanov herausgegeben. Aus den Sitzungsberichten der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1933. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1995 Converbs in Evenki. In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participles, Gerunds [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13], Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 97–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2007 Introduction. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustav J
1945 Das deverbale Nomen auf -i in den altaischen Sprachen. Studia orientalia edidit Societas orientalis fennica 11(6): 6.Google Scholar
1950 Das deverbale Nomen auf -m in den altaischen Sprachen. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 98: 255–264.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2009 Insubordination in Altaic. Вопросы филологии 1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzanne B.K
1981 Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Sechenchogtu. 斯钦朝克图
1999 康家语研究 ( Research on the Kangjia language ). Shanghai: 远东出版社 Far East Publishing.Google Scholar
Slater, Keith
2003 The Grammar of Mangghuer: A Mongolic Language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu Sprachbund. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1999 Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1987 Repetition in conversation: Towards a poetics of talk. Language 63(3): 574–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenishev, E.R
1984 Uygurskie Teksty. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Thackston, Wheeler M
(ed.) 1993 The Baburnama: Memoirs of Babur, Prince and Emperor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L
1993 A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds) 1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization, 2 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.