Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 209246
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2013Areal diffusion and parallelism in drift: Shared grammaticalization patterns. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey
2006Towards a typology of the Siberian linguistic area. In Linguistic Areas. Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds), 266–300. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Antonov, Anton
2007Le rôle des suffixes nominaux en /+rV/ dans l’expression du lieu et de la direction en japonais et l’hypothèse de leur origine “altaïque”. PhD dissertation, Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Paris.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2001Finite vs. non finite languages. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1400–1413. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L
1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Nominalization in Asian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 343–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U
1989Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel
1991Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon [Turcologica 7]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2004A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax: An Introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya M
2002Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1998Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74: 728–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1975Das tschuwaschische Aoristthema. Orientalia Suenica 24: 106–158.Google Scholar
1979Alttürkisch as ‘dissimilierende Sprache’ [Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Geistes-und sozial-wissenschaftliche Klasse 3]. Wiesbaden: SteinerGoogle Scholar
2000Traces of a Turkic copula verb. Turkic Languages 4: 235–238.Google Scholar
2002Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors [Contributions to the Sociology of Language 86], Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds), 285‒313. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012From the intimate life of Turkic sonorants. Paper presented at the Workshop West Old Turkic: Turkic loanwords in Hungarian , dedicated to Professor András Róna-Tas on the occasion of his 80th birthday. The Szeged Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, March 11–13.
Johanson, Lars & Robbeets, Martine
2010Introduction. In Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance [Turcologica 78], Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 1–5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D
2006On projecting variation back into a proto-language, with particular attention to Germanic evidence. In Variation and Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 268], Thomas Cravens (ed.), 103–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A variationist solution to apparent copying across related languages. In Copies Versus Cognates in Bound Morphology, Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets (eds), 151–164. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Demystifying drift: A variationist account. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 43–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Daniel
2009The Kitan Language and Script. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krüger, John
1961Chuvash Manual. Introduction, Grammar, Reader and Vocabulary [Uralic and Altaic Series 7]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy
1965Zur Vorgeschichte des germanischen Verbalsystems. Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Volkskunde und Literaturforschung: Wolfgang Steinitz zum 60. Geburtstag, 242–247. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J
1994Parallel grammaticalizations in Tibeto-Birman languages: Evidence of Sapir’s ‘drift’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17(1): 61–80.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Mun & Ramsey, Robert
2011A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2000Perfect, evidentiality and related categories in Tungusic languages. In Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 441–469. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Nominalization / verbalization: Constraining a Typology of Transcategorial Operations. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2006Constraining nominalization: Function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5): 973–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Verbalization and insubordination in Siberian languages. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1981Drift, slope, and slant: Background of, and variations upon, a Sapirian theme. Language 57(3): 535–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo
1970Shodon: A dialect of the northern Ryukyus. Journal of the American Oriental Society 90(1): 97–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987The Japanese Language Through Time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1992A Reference Grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
1996Consonant Lenition in Korean and the Macro-Altaic Question. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
2002Coming and going: Deictic verbs in Korean and Japanese. In Pathways into Korean Language and Culture: Essays in Honor of Young-Key Kim-Renaud, Sang-Oak Lee & Gregory K. Iverson (eds), 373–381. Seoul: Pagijong Press.Google Scholar
2006What do Japanese and Korean have in common? The history of certain grammaticalizations. Korean Linguistics 13: 219–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1921Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1):69–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Shifting finiteness in nominalization: From definitization to refinitization. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1995Converbs in Evenki. In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms—Adverbial Participles, Gerunds [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13], Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 97–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V
1997Evenki. Descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2007Introduction. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Orlovskaya, M.N
1999Yazyk mongolskikh textov XIII-XIV vv. Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN.Google Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2009Intensive contact and the copying of paradigms: An Even dialect in contact with Sakha (Yakut). Journal of Language Contact 2: 85–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1998The covariation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2: 195–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1954Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2005Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? [Turcologica 64]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2009Insubordination in Altaic. Journal of Philology. Ural-Altaic Studies 1: 61–79.Google Scholar
2013aGenealogically motivated grammaticalization. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bA velar fricative in proto-Transeurasian. In Turcology and Linguistics: Eva Agnes Csato Festschrift, Nurettin Demir, Birsel Karakoç & Astrid Menz (eds), 375–400. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
2015Diachrony of Verb Morphology. Japanese and the Transeurasian Languages [Trends in Linguistics 291]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. The development of finiteness in the Transeurasian languages. Linguistics.
Forthcomming. Proto-Transeurasian: Where and when? Man in India 95(4): 921-946.
Sárközi, Alice
2004Classical Mongolian. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Street, John
1957The Language of the Secret History of the Mongols. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence
1993A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
2009A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese. Part 2: Adjectives, Verbs, Adverbs, Conjunctions, Particles, Postpositions [Languages of Asia 8]. Folkestone: Global Oriental.Google Scholar
Weiers, Michael
1966Untersuchungen zu einer historischen Grammatik des präklassischen Schriftmongolisch. PhD dissertation, Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn.Google Scholar
Werner, Heinrich
1997Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wrona, Janick
2008The nominal and adnominal forms in Old Japanese: Consequences for a reconstruction of pre-Old Japanese syntax. In Proto-Japanese. Issues and Prospects [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 294], Bjarke Frellesvig & John Whitman (eds), 193–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Greed, Teija
2018. From perfect to narrative tense. Studies in Language 42:4  pp. 923 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.