Cover not available
Part of
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 283–309

Chapter 11. Insubordination in Aleut

 | Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska
Examples of insubordination are well attested in Eskimo languages, but they are rarely noted for the related language Aleut. In this chapter, therefore, I examine the possibility of insubordination in Aleut. The question is complicated by a number of factors, which I address here. For example, for there to be insubordination in a language, there must be subordination; in Aleut, there is little formal distinction between independence and subordination, and the identification of subordinate structures is formally (but not necessarily semantically) problematic. Furthermore, one of the primary mechanisms by which clauses become insubordinate is through ellipsis of an independent clause; this rarely occurs in Aleut. Finally, functions commonly associated with insubordination, e.g. evidentials, exhortations, prohibitions, etc., are often expressed via means other than subordination in Aleut. I conclude that Aleut does not have insubordination; nevertheless, this study may help in understanding the factors that block or disfavor the rise of insubordination.
Published online: 18 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.11ber
References (25)
References
Berge, Anna. 2009. Tracking topics: A comparison of “topic” in Aleut and Greenlandic discourse. In Variations in Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut Languages [Typological Studies in Language 86], Marc-Antoine Mahieu & Nicole Tersis (eds), 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. Unexpected non-anaphoric marking in Aleut. In Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds) [Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Typology 46], 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Coordination in Pribilof Islands Aleut. Linguistic Discovery 9(1): 1–30. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2011. Topic and Discourse Structure in West Greenlandic Agreement Constructions. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Berge, Anna & Dirks, Moses L. 2008. Niiĝuĝis Matal Tunux̂tazangis: How the Atkans Talk; A Conversational Grammar, with 7 Accompanying CDs. Fairbanks: ANLC.Google Scholar
Bergsland, Knut. 1955. A Grammatical Outline of the Eskimo Language of West Greenland. Oslo: Skrivemaskinstua.Google Scholar
. 1989. Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja/Journal de la Société Finno Ougrienne 82: 7–80.Google Scholar
. 1994. Aleut tenses and aspects. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll & Carl-Erik Lindberg (eds), 323–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Aleut Grammar. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Bergsland, Knut & Dirks, Moses L. (eds). 1990. Unangam Ungiikangin kayux Tunusangin: Unangam Uniikangis ama Tunuzangis; Aleut Tales and Narratives, Collected 1909–1910 by Waldemar Jochelson. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas. 1988. Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Willem. 1994. Siberian Yupik Eskimo: The Language and its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah University Press.Google Scholar
Dorais, Louis-Jacques. 1988. Tukilik: An Inuktitut Grammar for All [Inuit Studies Occasional Papers 2]. Quebec: Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. & Groupes D’Etudes Inuit et Circumpolaires.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic [Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars]. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Golovko, Evgeniy V. 2001. Imperative in Aleut. In Typology of Imperative Constructions, Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 300–314. Munichen: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard (eds). 1995. Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms; Adverbial Participles, Gerunds [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1999. Sentence types and clause subordination. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, Keith Brown & Jim Miller (eds), 329–343. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Steven A. 1995. A Practical Grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo Language. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Marking syntactic complexity: Some internal and external processes of development. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Cross-linguistic Studies on Clause Combining , Tokyo, November.
Miyaoka, Osahito. 1997. A chapter on the Alaskan Central Yupik subordinative mood. In Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. 2, Osahito Miyaoka & Minoru Oshima (eds), 61–146. Kyoto: Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
. 2012. A Grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold. 1999. The nominalist theory of Eskimo: A case study in scientific self deception. International Journal of American Linguistics 65: 363–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2010. Role and reference grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 707–742. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar