Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 283–309

Chapter 11. Insubordination in Aleut

| Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska

Examples of insubordination are well attested in Eskimo languages, but they are rarely noted for the related language Aleut. In this chapter, therefore, I examine the possibility of insubordination in Aleut. The question is complicated by a number of factors, which I address here. For example, for there to be insubordination in a language, there must be subordination; in Aleut, there is little formal distinction between independence and subordination, and the identification of subordinate structures is formally (but not necessarily semantically) problematic. Furthermore, one of the primary mechanisms by which clauses become insubordinate is through ellipsis of an independent clause; this rarely occurs in Aleut. Finally, functions commonly associated with insubordination, e.g. evidentials, exhortations, prohibitions, etc., are often expressed via means other than subordination in Aleut. I conclude that Aleut does not have insubordination; nevertheless, this study may help in understanding the factors that block or disfavor the rise of insubordination.

Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.11ber
References
Berge, Anna
2009 Tracking topics: A comparison of “topic” in Aleut and Greenlandic discourse. In Variations in Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut Languages [Typological Studies in Language 86], Marc-Antoine Mahieu & Nicole Tersis (eds), 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a Unexpected non-anaphoric marking in Aleut. In Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds) [Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Typology 46], 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Coordination in Pribilof Islands Aleut. Linguistic Discovery 9(1): 1–30. Crossref.Google Scholar
2011 Topic and Discourse Structure in West Greenlandic Agreement Constructions. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Berge, Anna & Dirks, Moses L
2008 Niiĝuĝis Matal Tunux̂tazangis: How the Atkans Talk; A Conversational Grammar, with 7 Accompanying CDs. Fairbanks: ANLC.Google Scholar
Bergsland, Knut
1955 A Grammatical Outline of the Eskimo Language of West Greenland. Oslo: Skrivemaskinstua.Google Scholar
1989 Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja/Journal de la Société Finno Ougrienne 82: 7–80.Google Scholar
1994 Aleut tenses and aspects. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll & Carl-Erik Lindberg (eds), 323–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Aleut Grammar. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Bergsland, Knut & Dirks, Moses L
(eds) 1990 Unangam Ungiikangin kayux Tunusangin: Unangam Uniikangis ama Tunuzangis; Aleut Tales and Narratives, Collected 1909–1910 by Waldemar Jochelson. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas
1988 Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Willem
1994 Siberian Yupik Eskimo: The Language and its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah University Press.Google Scholar
Dorais, Louis-Jacques
1988 Tukilik: An Inuktitut Grammar for All [Inuit Studies Occasional Papers 2]. Quebec: Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. & Groupes D’Etudes Inuit et Circumpolaires.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
1984 West Greenlandic [Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars]. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Golovko, Evgeniy V
2001 Imperative in Aleut. In Typology of Imperative Constructions, Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 300–314. Munichen: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard
(eds) 1995 Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms; Adverbial Participles, Gerunds [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D
1999 Sentence types and clause subordination. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, Keith Brown & Jim Miller (eds), 329–343. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Steven A
1995 A Practical Grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo Language. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Marking syntactic complexity: Some internal and external processes of development. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Cross-linguistic Studies on Clause Combining , Tokyo, November.
Miyaoka, Osahito
1997 A chapter on the Alaskan Central Yupik subordinative mood. In Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. 2, Osahito Miyaoka & Minoru Oshima (eds), 61–146. Kyoto: Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
2012 A Grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold
1999 The nominalist theory of Eskimo: A case study in scientific self deception. International Journal of American Linguistics 65: 363–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D
2010 Role and reference grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 707–742. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar