Article published in:
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 293329


Annamalai, E
1997Adjectival clauses in Tamil. Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Bubeník, Vít
1998A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chevillard, Jean-Luc
2007Syntactic duality in classical Tamil poems. In Masica (ed.), 211–245.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1996The unity of noun modifying clauses in Asian languages. In Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, January 8–10, Vol. 3, 1077–1088. Salaya, Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University at Salaya.Google Scholar
1998aAttributive clauses in Asian languages: Towards an areal typology. In Sprache in Raum und Zeit. In memoriam Johannes Bechert, Band 2, Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl Heinz Wagner & Wolfgang Wildgen (eds), 51–60. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
1998bRethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Horie, Kaoru
1995Complement clause versus relative clauses: Some Khmer evidence. In Discourse Grammar and Typology: Papers in Honor of John W. M. Verhaar [Studies in Language Companion Series 27], Werner Abraham, T. Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 65–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice
2009Correlative clause features in Sanskrit and Hindi/Urdu. In Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, Paola Crisma & Guiseppe Longobardi (eds), 271–291. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deo, Ashwini
2006Tense & Aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages: Variation & Diachrony. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Dhongde, Ramesh & Wali, Kashi
2009Marathi [London Oriental and African Language Library 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E.
1997Relative clauses in Eastern Shina. In Indo-European, Nostratic and Beyond: Festschrift for Vitalij V. Shevoroshkin, Peter Michalove, Irèn Hegedüs & Alexis Manaster-Ramer (eds), 140–154. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E. & Koul, Omkar
Ms.. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy and participial noun-modifying constructions in Hindi-Urdu and Kashmiri.
Hook, Peter E. & Pardeshi, Prashant
2013Prenominal participial phrases in Marathi, the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy, and picture nouns. Lingua Posnaniensis 55(2): 77–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Peter E. & Pardeshi, Prashant. MS-a.
‘Mouth-watering pakoras’, ‘frightened states’, and ‘key-twirling photos’: Three kinds of syntactic-semantic mismatches in Marathi’s prenominal participial phrases. Ms, NINJAL, Tokyo.
Hook, Peter E. & Pardeshi, Prashant. MS-b.
kodomo no asonde iru šašin [children’s playing photographs] vs. asonde iru kodomo no šašin [playing children’s photographs]: Mismatched prenominal participial phrases in Japanese, Marathi, and Hindi-Urdu. Ms, NINJAL, Tokyo.
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1991“DO-language” and “BECOME-language”: Two contrasting types of linguistic representations. In Empire of Signs: Semiotic Essays on Japanese Culture [Foundation of Semiotics 8], Yoshihiko Ikegami (ed.), 285–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Junghare, Indira
1973Restrictive relative clauses in Marathi. Indian Linguistics 34(4): 251–262.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna
2006Hindi [London Oriental and African Language Library 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelkar, Ashok
1973Relative clauses in Marathi: A plea for a less constricted view. Indian Linguistics 34(4): 274–300.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63–99.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki, Hook, Peter E. & Pardeshi, Prashant
Forthcoming. Displaced modification: Picture noun constructions in Marathi and Japanese.
Kuno, Susumu
1973The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin & Lee, Jeong-Shik
2012Gap in “gapless” relative clauses in Korean and other Asian languages. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics. Theories of Everything 17 (article 25): 204–214. Los Angeles CA: Dept. of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1991The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1972Relative clauses in South Asia. In The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds), 198–204. Chicago IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1988Semantics and pragmatics of noun-modifying constructions in Japanese. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Shelley Axmaker & Helen Singmaster (eds), 166–175. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Ozeki, Hiromi & Shirai, Yasuhiro
2007Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? SSLA 29: 169–196.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari
1997Marathi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pardeshi, Prashant
2002“Responsible” Japanese vs. “Intentional” Indic: A cognitive contrast of non-intentional events. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe 12: 123–144.Google Scholar
Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane
2013Noun modifying clause constructions in Dravidian. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Leipzig, August.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2009Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t: The case of relativization. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [Typhological Studies in Language 85], T. Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N.
1990Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jakob Samuel.
1973[1886]Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (reprint of Brill’s edition).Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata.
2012South Asian Languages: A Syntactic Typology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teramura, Hideo
1975Rentai syuusyoku no sintakusu to imi: Sono 1 (Syntax and semantics of noun modification 1) Nihongo Nihonbunka (Japanese Language and Culture) 4: 71–119.Google Scholar
1969The syntax of noun modification in Japanese. The Journal-Newsletter of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 6: 64–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, John
2013The prehead relative clause problem. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, Umut Özge (ed.), 361–180. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Wu, Tong
2011The syntax of prenominal relative clauses: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 15: 569–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kishimoto, Hideki, Peter Edwin Hook & Prashant Pardeshi
2018.  In Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 250],  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.