Chapter 2
Toward a cognitive typology of like-expressions
From a typological point of view, expressions of likeness are marked for a seemingly heterogeneous set of corresponding linguistic representations, ranging for instance from locative-based case marking strategies to lexical expressions and constructional patterns. I argue that like-concepts represent stative or processual/dynamic transitive relational units and hence entail strong ‘verbal’ features. This aspect links the question of the conceptual background of like-concepts to the domain of word classes. Accordingly, the semantics of like-expressions is conditioned both by the underlying conceptual source domain and the syntactic role the expression (lexeme or morpheme) takes up in a like-relation. In this sense, the paper distinguishes intraclausal verbal patterns (she equals/is like a queen) from clause combining patterns that relate to event images (she swims like a fish < *she swims like a fish swims). In addition, like-concepts can show up as relational concepts within NPs or as adverbial elements. Such syntactically and in parts pragmatically controlled features have a strong impact on the semantic instantiation of like-concepts that by themselves form a subtype of projection strategies. In fact, like-concepts can be scaled according to the degree to which the domain of the other is mapped onto the identity of the referent. Such a scale may start from the following model: similar to Y> alike/equal to Y > become/changed to Y > temporarily be Y > be Y. Contrary to identification concepts, like-concepts do not signal the inclusion of a referential unit into a specific set or the referential specification of given ‘properties’. Rather, like-concepts are projection strategies that relate a referential unit to properties of another referential unit in a way that ‘disguises’ or ‘masks’ the trajectory unit with the help of properties typical for the landmark unit. This relates them to become-concepts (temporary transfiguration), motion (‘X moves into the region of Y thus acquiring properties of Y’) and imaging/imitation (‘X is the picture of Y’, ‘X mirrors Y’ etc.). In addition, disguising processes can be directly expressed by referring to the domain of gestalt/shape. This model is probably related to cultural practices of temporary transfiguration.
The chapter elaborates these conceptual source domains from the point of view of diachronic lexical typology. Data used to illustrate these domains are mainly taken from Indo-European languages supplemented by data from non-Indo-European, mainly Semitic, languages. Additionally, the findings are evaluated with the help of data stemming from basically two East Caucasian languages, namely Udi and its earlier relative Caucasian Albanian. The results of the second part of the paper elaborate the proposed (diachronic) semantic map of like-concepts that may serve as a preliminary template when searching for features of both Universal Cognitive Semantics and Cultural Linguistics with respect to the typology of like-concepts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
-
2.
like-constructions
- 2.1Basic patterns
- 2.2The pattern ‘be(+adj)+like Y’
- 2.3
like-verbs
- 2.4
like-adjectives
- 2.5Summary
- 3.The cognitive semantics of like-concepts
- 4.
like-concepts in Udi and Caucasian Albanian: A case study
- 5.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
Abbrevations and symbols
-
References
References
Bežanov, Semjon
1902 Gospoda Nashego Iisusa Xrista Svjatoe evangelie ot Matfeja, Marka, Luki i Ioanna na russkom i udinskom jazykax (
The holly Gospel of our lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew, Mark, Luke and John in the Russian and Udin languages). Tiflis: Izdanie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.
Bilalov, A. B. & Tagirov, A. A.
1987 Lezgi č’al (
The Lezgian language). Maxačkala: Dagučpediz.
Brachman, Ronald J. & Schmolze, James G.
1985 An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system.
Cognitive Science 9: 171–216.
Bravmann, Max
1977 Studies in Semitic Philology. Leiden: Brill.
de Reuse, Willem Joseph
1994 Siberian Yupik Eskimo. The Language and its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.
Dirr, Adolf
1928 Udische Texte.
Caucasica 5: 60–72.
Feuerbach, Ludwig
1965 [1841] Das Wesen des Christentums,
Werner Schuffenhauser (ed.), 2 Vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Fortescue, Michael
2010 Similitude: A conceptual category.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42 (2): 11–142.
Gardiner, Alan
1966 [1957] Egyptian Grammar, 3rd edn. London: OUP.
Geeraerts, Dirk
1997 Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Diachrony. Oxord: OUP.
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010 Prospects for the past: Perspectives for diachronic cognitive semantics. In
Historical Cognitive Linguistics,
Margaret E. Winters,
Heli Tissari &
Kathryn Allan (eds), 33–356. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gelb, Ignace J., Landsberger, Benno & Oppenheim, A. Leo
(eds) 1962 The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Vol. 16. Chicago & Glückstadt: Oriental Institute & Augustin.
Gippert, Jost, Schulze, Wolfgang, Aleksidze, Zaza & Mahé, Jean-Pierre
2009 The Caucasian Albanian Palimsests of Mt. Sinai, 2 Vols. Turnhout: Brépols.
Haspelmath, Martin
2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In
The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2,
Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
1998 Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In
Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe,
Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 Word Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Hobbes, Thom[as]
1657 Elementa philosophica de cive. Amsterdam: L. & D. Elzevirii.
Hübschmann, Heinrich
1972 [1897] Armenische Grammatik. Erster Teil: Armenische Etymologie
. Hildesheim: Olms.
Jagersma, Abraham Hendrik
2010 A Descriptive Grammar of Sumerian. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
[URL]
Jasanoff, Jay H.
1991 The origin of the Celtic comparative type OIr tressa, MW trech ‘stronger’.
Die Sprache 34: 171–189.
Jones, John Morris
1913 Welsh Grammar: Historical and Comparative. Oxford: Clarendon.
Jung, Carl Gustav
1976 [1933] Die Archetypen und das kollektiv Unterbewusste,
Lilly Jung-Merker &
Elisabeth Rüf (eds). Freiburg im Breisgau: Walter.
Kečaari, Georgi
2001 Orayin. Azəbaycan Dövlət Nəşriyyatı.
Kelsey, D. M.
2004 [1898] Life and Public Services of Honorable William E. Gladstone. Containing a Full Account of the Most Celebrated Orator and Statesman of Modern Times. Whitefish MT: Kessinger.
Mead, George Herbert
1934 Mind, Self, and Society,
Charles W. Morris (ed.). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Oppenheim, A. Leo & Reiner, Erica
(eds) 1977 The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Vol. 10. Chicago IL: Oriental Institute.
Pokorny, Julius
1959 Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Berlin: Francke.
Rastier, François
1999 Cognitive Semantics and diachronic semantics. The values and evolution of classes. In
Historical Semantics and Cognition,
Andreas Blank &
Peter Koch (eds), 109–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
Schulze, Ilona
2014 Sprache als Fait culturel. Studien zur Emergenz, Motiviertheit und Systematizität des Lexikons des Minderico (Portugal). Hamburg: Kovač.
Schulze, Wolfgang
1998 Person, Klasse, Kongruenz, 2 Vols. Munich: Lincom.
Schulze, Wolfgang
2011 Prolegomenon zu einer Kognitiven Typologie der sprachlichen Symbolisierung von Ursache/Wirkung-Konzeptualisierungen.
Slowakische Zeitschrift für Germanistik 3 (2): 7–23.
Schulze, Wolfgang
2014 The emergence of diathesis markers from motion concepts. In
Metaphor and Metonomy across Time and Cultures Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language,
Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), 171–223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schulze, Wolfgang & Sallaberger, Walter
2007 Grammatische Relationen im Sumerischen.
Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 2007 (2): 163–214.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2006 The Icelandic noun phrase: Central traits.
Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 121: 193–236.
[URL] (7 May 2016).
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
Taine-Cheikh, Catherine
2004 De la grammaticalisation de ‘comme’ (comparative) en arabe. In
Approaches to Arabic Dialects. Collection of Articles Presented to Manfred Woidich on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday,
Marine Haak,
Rudolf de Jong &
Kees Versteegh (eds), 309–328. Leiden: Brill.
Ultan, Russell
1972 Some features of basic comparative constructions.
Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.
Vasmer, Max (Maks Fasmer)
1986 Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka. (
Etymological dictionary of the Russian language), Perevod c Nem.
O. N. Trubačeva, Vol. 1. Moskva: Progress.
Wehr, Hans
1979 A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic,
J. Milton Cowan (ed.), 4th edn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996 Semantics: Primes and Universals: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.
Wright, William
1996 [1862] A Grammar of the Arabic Language: Translated from the German of Caspari and Edited with Numerous Additions and Corrections, Vol. 2, 3rd edn. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.
Ǯeiranišvili, Evgeni
1971 Udiuri ena. Gramat’ik’a, krestomat’ia, leksik’oni. Tbilisi: Tbilisi univ. gamomcemloba.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Fishman, Alon
2020.
English similarity predicates construe particular dimensions of similarity.
Cognitive Linguistics 31:3
► pp. 453 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.