Chapter published in:
Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Yvonne Treis and Martine Vanhove
[Typological Studies in Language 117] 2017
► pp. 3378
References
Bežanov, Semjon
1902Gospoda Nashego Iisusa Xrista Svjatoe evangelie ot Matfeja, Marka, Luki i Ioanna na russkom i udinskom jazykax (The holly Gospel of our lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew, Mark, Luke and John in the Russian and Udin languages). Tiflis: Izdanie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.Google Scholar
Bilalov, A. B. & Tagirov, A. A.
1987Lezgi č’al (The Lezgian language). Maxačkala: Dagučpediz.Google Scholar
Brachman, Ronald J. & Schmolze, James G.
1985An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9: 171–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bravmann, Max
1977Studies in Semitic Philology. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2009When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics [Human Cognitive Processing 24], Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds), 127–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2014Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38 (3): 605–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Willem Joseph
1994Siberian Yupik Eskimo. The Language and its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf
1928Udische Texte. Caucasica 5: 60–72.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig
1965 [1841]Das Wesen des Christentums, Werner Schuffenhauser (ed.), 2 Vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
2010Similitude: A conceptual category. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42 (2): 11–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Alan
1966 [1957]Egyptian Grammar, 3rd edn. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1997Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Diachrony. Oxord: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Prospects for the past: Perspectives for diachronic cognitive semantics. In Historical Cognitive Linguistics, Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds), 33–356. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J., Landsberger, Benno & Oppenheim, A. Leo
(eds) 1962The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Vol. 16. Chicago & Glückstadt: Oriental Institute & Augustin.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Schulze, Wolfgang, Aleksidze, Zaza & Mahé, Jean-Pierre
2009The Caucasian Albanian Palimsests of Mt. Sinai, 2 Vols. Turnhout: Brépols.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
1998Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002Word Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thom[as]
1657Elementa philosophica de cive. Amsterdam: L. & D. Elzevirii.Google Scholar
Hübschmann, Heinrich
1972 [1897]Armenische Grammatik. Erster Teil: Armenische Etymologie . Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Jagersma, Abraham Hendrik
Jasanoff, Jay H.
1991The origin of the Celtic comparative type OIr tressa, MW trech ‘stronger’. Die Sprache 34: 171–189.Google Scholar
Jones, John Morris
1913Welsh Grammar: Historical and Comparative. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Jung, Carl Gustav
1976 [1933]Die Archetypen und das kollektiv Unterbewusste, Lilly Jung-Merker & Elisabeth Rüf (eds). Freiburg im Breisgau: Walter.Google Scholar
Kečaari, Georgi
2001Orayin. Azəbaycan Dövlət Nəşriyyatı.Google Scholar
Kelsey, D. M.
2004 [1898]Life and Public Services of Honorable William E. Gladstone. Containing a Full Account of the Most Celebrated Orator and Statesman of Modern Times. Whitefish MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert
1934Mind, Self, and Society, Charles W. Morris (ed.). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. Leo & Reiner, Erica
(eds) 1977The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Vol. 10. Chicago IL: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Berlin: Francke.Google Scholar
Rastier, François
1999Cognitive Semantics and diachronic semantics. The values and evolution of classes. In Historical Semantics and Cognition, Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds), 109–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Ilona
2014Sprache als Fait culturel. Studien zur Emergenz, Motiviertheit und Systematizität des Lexikons des Minderico (Portugal). Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
1998Person, Klasse, Kongruenz, 2 Vols. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2011Prolegomenon zu einer Kognitiven Typologie der sprachlichen Symbolisierung von Ursache/Wirkung-Konzeptualisierungen. Slowakische Zeitschrift für Germanistik 3 (2): 7–23.Google Scholar
2014The emergence of diathesis markers from motion concepts. In Metaphor and Metonomy across Time and Cultures Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language, Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), 171–223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang & Sallaberger, Walter
2007Grammatische Relationen im Sumerischen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 2007 (2): 163–214.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2006The Icelandic noun phrase: Central traits. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 121: 193–236. http://​person2​.sol​.lu​.se​/HalldorSigurdsson​/HS​/TheIcelandicNounPhrase​.pdf (7 May 2016).
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
2009Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taine-Cheikh, Catherine
2004De la grammaticalisation de ‘comme’ (comparative) en arabe. In Approaches to Arabic Dialects. Collection of Articles Presented to Manfred Woidich on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, Marine Haak, Rudolf de Jong & Kees Versteegh (eds), 309–328. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1972Some features of basic comparative constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max (Maks Fasmer)
1986Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka. (Etymological dictionary of the Russian language), Perevod c Nem. O. N. Trubačeva, Vol. 1. Moskva: Progress.Google Scholar
Wehr, Hans
1979A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, J. Milton Cowan (ed.), 4th edn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996Semantics: Primes and Universals: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wright, William
1996 [1862]A Grammar of the Arabic Language: Translated from the German of Caspari and Edited with Numerous Additions and Corrections, Vol. 2, 3rd edn. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Ǯeiranišvili, Evgeni
1971Udiuri ena. Gramat’ik’a, krestomat’ia, leksik’oni. Tbilisi: Tbilisi univ. gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fishman, Alon
2020. English similarity predicates construe particular dimensions of similarity . Cognitive Linguistics 31:3  pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.