Cover not available
Part of
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 131–159

Chapter 6
The essive in Veps

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of a marker referred to as the ‘essive’ in Veps. The description of the properties of this marker follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is contrasted with its use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by this form is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Keywords: Veps, depictive, essive case, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, focus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Veps case system
    • 1.2The Veps essive and secondary predicates
    • 1.3The translative in parallel constructions
  • 2.Non-verbal predication
  • 3.Secondary predication
  • 4.Predicative complements
  • 5.Adverbials
  • 6.Temporality and location
  • 7.Comparative and simile expressions
  • 8.Essive versus translative
  • 9.Word order
  • 10.Conclusion and final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.06gru
References (43)
References
Arkadiev, Peter. 2009. Poor (two-term) case systems: Limits of neutralization. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 686–699. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville. 2002. The Surrey Syncretisms Database. <[URL]> (16 December 2013).
Baerman, Matthew & Brown, Dunstan. 2005a. Case syncretism. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville. 2005b. The Syntax-morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Jim. 2005. Word-based declension in Estonian. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Eldia 2011 = European language diversity for all. An international research project funded by the 7th EU framework programme 2010-2013. The Veps interview data was collected for this project in the republic of Karelia in March 2011.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja & Vare, Silvi. 1993. Eesti keele grammatika, II: Süntaks. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Grünthal, Riho. 2001. Homonymy and systemacy in Estonian noun inflection. In Keele kannul. Pühendusteos Mati Erelti 60. sünnipäevaks 12. märtsil 2001 [Tartu Ülikooli Eesti Keele Õppetooli Toimetised 17], Reet Kasik (koost. ja toim), 42–61. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
. 2003. Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 244]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
2007. Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian. In Beiträge zur Morphologie. Germanisch, baltisch, ostseefinnisch, Hans Fix (ed.), 403–432. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. Sijasynkretismi morfologian koetinkivenä (The morphological impact of case syncretism). Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 2: 91–113. <[URL]>
. 2010b. Syncretism in the Central Veps local case system. Linguistica Uralica 46: 250–260. <[URL]>
. 2011. Population decline and the erosion of the Veps language community. In The Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities [Uralica Helsingiensia 5], Riho Grünthal & Magdolna Kovács, 267–293. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
. 2015. Vepsän kielioppi [Apuneuvoja Suomalais-ugrilaisten Kielten Opintoja Varten 17]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja Riitta & Alho, Irja. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: SKS. <[URL]> (2 January 2014).
Hamari, Arja. 2008. The Negation of Stative Relation Clauses in the Mordvin Languages [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 254]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri & Siro, Paavo. 1935. Näytteitä vepsän murteista [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 70]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri. 1943. Vepsän murteiden lauseopillinen tutkimus [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 86]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Koskenpä 2007 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Koskenpä (Leningrad oblast), August 2007.Google Scholar
Kurba 2006 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Kurba (Leningrad oblast), June 2006.Google Scholar
Ladv 2006 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Ladv (Leningrad oblast), June 2006.Google Scholar
Leskinen, Juha. 1990. Suomen kielen inkongruentit instruktiivirakenteet ja niiden tausta [Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 536]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2008[2000]. Synkretismus. In Morphologie – Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung – An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 638–647. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mäggär'v 2007 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Mäggär'v (Leningrad oblast), August 2007.Google Scholar
Nikunlassi, Ahti. 1998.=Ахти Никунласси: Об эквивалентах финского эссива в русском языке. In Aikalainen. Professori Arto Mustajoen juhlateos: Festschrift Mustajoki on CD-ROM, Timo Hämäläinen et al. (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Slavonic Languages.Google Scholar
Oinas, Felix. 1961. The Development of Some Postpositional Cases in Balto-Finnic Languages [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 123]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Puura, Ulriikka, Karjalainen, Heini, Zajceva, Nina & Grünthal, Riho. 2013. The Veps Language in Russia. Eldia Case-Specific Report [Studies in European Language Diversity 25]. Mainz: Research consortium ELDIA.Google Scholar
Ross, Kristiina. 1988. Instruktiiv läänemeresoome keeltes. Tallinn: Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Saressalo, Lassi (ed.). 2005. Vepsä – maa, kansa, kulttuuri [Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 1005]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova. 1989.=З. И. Строгальщикова: Об этнографических тенденциях социально-экономическоми културном развитии вепсской народности. In: В. Пименова, З. Строгальщикова & Ю. Сурхаско (ред.), Проблемы истории и культуры вепсской народности. Петрозаводск. 27–42.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova, Zinaida. 2005a. Päättyykö vepsäläisten historiallinen taival? In Saressalo (ed.), 211–235.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Vepsän kieli muutosten kynnyksellä. In Saressalo (ed.), 171–180.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova. 2006.=З. И. Строгальщикова: Вепсы. Этнодемографические процессы прошлое и настоящее. In: И. Ю. Винокурова (отв. ред.), Современная наука о вепсах. Достижения и перспективы. Петрозаводск. 378–412.Google Scholar
Tikka, Toivo. 1992. Vepsän suffiksoituneet postpositiot. Kieliopillisiin sijoihin liittyvä suffiksoituminen [Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 22]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Zajceva, Marija. 1981. = Мария Зайцева: Грамматика вепсского языка . Ленинград: Наука.Google Scholar
Zajceva, Nina. 1981. = Нина Зайцева: Именное словоизменение в вепсском языке. Петрозаводск: Карелия.Google Scholar
. 2003. Vepsän kelen grammatik. Teoretine openduzkirj 5–9 klassoile. Petrozavodsk: Periodika.Google Scholar
. 2005. Vepsän kielestä ja murteista. In Saressalo (ed.), 152–162.Google Scholar
. 2009. = Н. Г. Зайцева: Младописьменный вепсский язык и его употребление в современном обществе. In Вепсы на рубеже XX–XXI веков. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр. 163–170.Google Scholar
Zajceva Nina et al. 2013. = Н. Г. Зайцева, Е. Е. Харитонова & O. Ю. Жукова: Орфографический словарь вепсского языка. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ainsworth, Zeprina‐Jaz
2019. The Veps Illative: The Applicability of an Abstractive Approach to an Agglutinative Language. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.