Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 131159
References

References

Arkadiev, Peter
2009Poor (two-term) case systems: Limits of neutralization. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 686–699. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville
2002The Surrey Syncretisms Database. http://​www​.smg​.surrey​.ac​.uk​/Syncretism​/explore​.aspx (16 December 2013).
Baerman, Matthew & Brown, Dunstan
2005aCase syncretism. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville
2005bThe Syntax-morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna
2007Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Jim
2005Word-based declension in Estonian. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew
1987Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Eldia
2011 = European language diversity for all. An international research project funded by the 7th EU framework programme 2010-2013. The Veps interview data was collected for this project in the republic of Karelia in March 2011.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja & Vare, Silvi
1993Eesti keele grammatika, II: Süntaks. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Grünthal, Riho
2001Homonymy and systemacy in Estonian noun inflection. In Keele kannul. Pühendusteos Mati Erelti 60. sünnipäevaks 12. märtsil 2001 [Tartu Ülikooli Eesti Keele Õppetooli Toimetised 17], Reet Kasik (koost. ja toim), 42–61. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
2003Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 244]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
2007Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian. In Beiträge zur Morphologie. Germanisch, baltisch, ostseefinnisch, Hans Fix (ed.), 403–432. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010aSijasynkretismi morfologian koetinkivenä (The morphological impact of case syncretism). Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 2: 91–113. http://​jeful​.ut​.ee​/public​/files​/grynthal​-esuka2​.pdf
2010bSyncretism in the Central Veps local case system. Linguistica Uralica 46: 250–260. http://​www​.kirj​.ee​/public​/Linguistica​_Uralica​/2010​/issue​_4​/ling​-2010​-4​-250​-260​.pdf
2011Population decline and the erosion of the Veps language community. In The Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities [Uralica Helsingiensia 5], Riho Grünthal & Magdolna Kovács, 267–293. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Grünthal, Riho 2015Vepsän kielioppi [Apuneuvoja Suomalais-ugrilaisten Kielten Opintoja Varten 17]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja Riitta & Alho, Irja
2004Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: SKS. http://​scripta​.kotus​.fi​/visk (2 January 2014).
Hamari, Arja
2008The Negation of Stative Relation Clauses in the Mordvin Languages [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 254]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri & Siro, Paavo
1935Näytteitä vepsän murteista [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 70]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri
1943Vepsän murteiden lauseopillinen tutkimus [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 86]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Koskenpä
2007 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Koskenpä (Leningrad oblast), August 2007.Google Scholar
Kurba
2006 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Kurba (Leningrad oblast), June 2006.Google Scholar
Ladv
2006 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Ladv (Leningrad oblast), June 2006.Google Scholar
Leskinen, Juha
1990Suomen kielen inkongruentit instruktiivirakenteet ja niiden tausta [Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 536]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2008[2000]Synkretismus. In Morphologie – Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung – An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 638–647. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mäggär'v
2007 = The author's fieldwork data from the village Mäggär'v (Leningrad oblast), August 2007.Google Scholar
Nikunlassi, Ahti
1998. = Ахти Никунласси: Об эквивалентах финского эссива в русском языке. In Aikalainen. Professori Arto Mustajoen juhlateos: Festschrift Mustajoki on CD-ROM, Timo Hämäläinen et al. (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Slavonic Languages.Google Scholar
Oinas, Felix
1961The Development of Some Postpositional Cases in Balto-Finnic Languages [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 123]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas
1997Describing Morphosyntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Puura, Ulriikka, Karjalainen, Heini, Zajceva, Nina & Grünthal, Riho
2013The Veps Language in Russia. Eldia Case-Specific Report [Studies in European Language Diversity 25]. Mainz: Research consortium ELDIA.Google Scholar
Ross, Kristiina
1988Instruktiiv läänemeresoome keeltes. Tallinn: Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Saressalo, Lassi
(ed.) 2005Vepsä – maa, kansa, kulttuuri [Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 1005]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova
1989. = З. И. Строгальщикова: Об этнографических тенденциях социально-экономическоми културном развитии вепсской народности. In: В. Пименова, З. Строгальщикова & Ю. Сурхаско (ред.), Проблемы истории и культуры вепсской народности. Петрозаводск. 27–42.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova, Zinaida
2005aPäättyykö vepsäläisten historiallinen taival? In Saressalo (ed.), 211–235.Google Scholar
2005bVepsän kieli muutosten kynnyksellä. In Saressalo (ed.), 171–180.Google Scholar
Strogal’shchikova
2006. = З. И. Строгальщикова: Вепсы. Этнодемографические процессы прошлое и настоящее. In: И. Ю. Винокурова (отв. ред.), Современная наука о вепсах. Достижения и перспективы. Петрозаводск. 378–412.Google Scholar
Tikka, Toivo
1992Vepsän suffiksoituneet postpositiot. Kieliopillisiin sijoihin liittyvä suffiksoituminen [Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 22]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Zajceva, Marija
1981 = Мария Зайцева: Грамматика вепсского языка . Ленинград: Наука.Google Scholar
Zajceva, Nina
1981 = Нина Зайцева: Именное словоизменение в вепсском языке. Петрозаводск: Карелия.Google Scholar
Zajceva, Nina 2003Vepsän kelen grammatik. Teoretine openduzkirj 5–9 klassoile. Petrozavodsk: Periodika.Google Scholar
2005Vepsän kielestä ja murteista. In Saressalo (ed.), 152–162.Google Scholar
2009 = Н. Г. Зайцева: Младописьменный вепсский язык и его употребление в современном обществе. In Вепсы на рубеже XX–XXI веков. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр. 163–170.Google Scholar
Zajceva Nina et al.
2013 = Н. Г. Зайцева, Е. Е. Харитонова & O. Ю. Жукова: Орфографический словарь вепсского языка. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ainsworth, Zeprina-Jaz
2019. The Veps Illative: The Applicability of an Abstractive Approach to an Agglutinative Language. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.