Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 217–241

The essive in North Saami

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of a morphological case labelled as the ‘essive’ in North Saami. The description of the properties of this case follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is contrasted with its use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by this form is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Keywords: North Saami, depictive, essive case, secondary predication
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.09yli
References

Corpus

SIKOR = SIKOR
UiT The Arctic University of Norway and the Norwegian Saami Parliament’s Saami text collection. http://​gtweb​.uit​.no​/korp/

References

Ajanki, Rigina
2014 The grown-up siblings: history and functions of Western Uralic *kse. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 62: 241–282.Google Scholar
Antonsen, Lene, Janda, Laura & Baal, Biret Ánne Bals
2012 Njealji davvisámi adposišuvnna geavahus (The use of four North Saami adpositions). Sámi dieđalaš áigečála 2/2012: 7–38.Google Scholar
Bartens, Raija
1972 Inarinlapin, merilapin ja luulajanlapin kaasussyntaksi [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 148]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis 2014 Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38(3): 605–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ganander, Henricus
1743 Grammatica Lapponica. Holmia: Salvius.Google Scholar
Friis, Jens Andreas
1856 Lappisk Grammatik. Udarbeidet efter den finmarkiske Hoveddialekt eller Sproget, saaledes som det almindeligst tales i norsk Finmarken. Christiania: J.W. Cappelen.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2005 Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leem, Knud
1768 Lexicon Lapponicum bipartitum, Lapponico – Danico – Latinum & Danico – Latino – Lapponicum, cum indice Latino. Pars prima Lapponico – Danico – Latina. Nidrosiae: Seminarium Lapponicum Fridericianum. http://​www​.nb​.no​/nbsok​/nb​/6e6ccf1498a8a38f00841ee68af98175
Nickel, Klaus Peter & Sammallahti, Pekka
2011 Nordsamisk grammatikk. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Konrad
1926 Lærebok i lappisk, I: Grammatikk. Lydlære, formlære, orddannelseslære og syntaks samt tillegg. Oslo: A.W. Brøgger.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998 The Saami Languages: An Introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 8: 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2002 Zu den adverbialen Nominalkonstruktionen im Nordlappischen. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 57: 68–166.Google Scholar
Turi, Johan
1910  Muittalus samid birra . En bog om lappernes liv. Stockholm: A.-B. Nordiska bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2009 Non-finites in North Saami [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 257]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
2014a Davvisámegiela substantiivavuđot -naga-hámit giellaoahpa ja sátnevuorkká rájá alde (Denominal forms with -naga in North Saami: Between grammar and lexicon). Sámi dieđalaš áigečála 1/2014: 51–74.Google Scholar
2014b Kieliopin arvoituksia marissa ja pohjoissaamessa: Depiktiiviset suffiksit -ńek ja -naga . In Juuret marin murteissa, latvus yltää Uraliin. Juhlakirja Sirkka Saarisen 60-vuotispäiväksi 21.12.2014, Nobufumi Inaba, Jorma Luutonen, Arja Hamari and Elina Ahola (eds), 415–432. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2016 Degrammaticalization in North Saami: Development of adpositions, adverbs and a free lexical noun from inflectional and derivational suffixes. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 40: 113–173.Google Scholar
2017 Similarity, equality and the like in North Saami. In Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 117], Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds), 259–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming). On the tracks of the Proto-Uralic suffix *-ksi – a new but old perspective on the origin of the Mari lative. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 96.