Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 217241
References

Corpus

SIKOR = SIKOR
UiT The Arctic University of Norway and the Norwegian Saami Parliament’s Saami text collection. http://​gtweb​.uit​.no​/korp/

References

Ajanki, Rigina
2014The grown-up siblings: history and functions of Western Uralic *kse. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 62: 241–282.Google Scholar
Antonsen, Lene, Janda, Laura & Baal, Biret Ánne Bals
2012Njealji davvisámi adposišuvnna geavahus (The use of four North Saami adpositions). Sámi dieđalaš áigečála 2/2012: 7–38.Google Scholar
Bartens, Raija
1972Inarinlapin, merilapin ja luulajanlapin kaasussyntaksi [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 148]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis 2014Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38(3): 605–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ganander, Henricus
1743Grammatica Lapponica. Holmia: Salvius.Google Scholar
Friis, Jens Andreas
1856Lappisk Grammatik. Udarbeidet efter den finmarkiske Hoveddialekt eller Sproget, saaledes som det almindeligst tales i norsk Finmarken. Christiania: J.W. Cappelen.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2005Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leem, Knud
1768Lexicon Lapponicum bipartitum, Lapponico – Danico – Latinum & Danico – Latino – Lapponicum, cum indice Latino. Pars prima Lapponico – Danico – Latina. Nidrosiae: Seminarium Lapponicum Fridericianum. http://​www​.nb​.no​/nbsok​/nb​/6e6ccf1498a8a38f00841ee68af98175
Nickel, Klaus Peter & Sammallahti, Pekka
2011Nordsamisk grammatikk. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Konrad
1926Lærebok i lappisk, I: Grammatikk. Lydlære, formlære, orddannelseslære og syntaks samt tillegg. Oslo: A.W. Brøgger.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998The Saami Languages: An Introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 8: 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2002Zu den adverbialen Nominalkonstruktionen im Nordlappischen. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 57: 68–166.Google Scholar
Turi, Johan
1910 Muittalus samid birra . En bog om lappernes liv. Stockholm: A.-B. Nordiska bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2009Non-finites in North Saami [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 257]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
2014aDavvisámegiela substantiivavuđot -naga-hámit giellaoahpa ja sátnevuorkká rájá alde (Denominal forms with -naga in North Saami: Between grammar and lexicon). Sámi dieđalaš áigečála 1/2014: 51–74.Google Scholar
2014bKieliopin arvoituksia marissa ja pohjoissaamessa: Depiktiiviset suffiksit -ńek ja -naga . In Juuret marin murteissa, latvus yltää Uraliin. Juhlakirja Sirkka Saarisen 60-vuotispäiväksi 21.12.2014, Nobufumi Inaba, Jorma Luutonen, Arja Hamari and Elina Ahola (eds), 415–432. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2016Degrammaticalization in North Saami: Development of adpositions, adverbs and a free lexical noun from inflectional and derivational suffixes. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 40: 113–173.Google Scholar
2017Similarity, equality and the like in North Saami. In Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 117], Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds), 259–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming). On the tracks of the Proto-Uralic suffix *-ksi – a new but old perspective on the origin of the Mari lative. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 96.