Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 243–260

The essive in Skolt Saami

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of a marker referred to as the ‘essive’ in Skolt Saami. The description of the properties of this marker follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is also contrasted with its use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change).
Keywords: Skolt Saami, essive, translative, non-verbal predication, secondary predication, predicative complementation, depictive, resultative
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.10fei
References

Data sources

The source of each example presented in this paper is given using the following abbreviations. For examples from written sources, this is followed by the page number. Examples taken from the audio recordings provided to me by Suomen kielen nauhoitearkisto are followed by a unique code used by KOTUS to identify the recording.

EE
KK
MM
SKNA

References

Feist, Timothy
2015 A Grammar of Skolt Saami [Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 273]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva F.
(eds) 2005 Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: A Typology of Depictives. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Toivo
1958 Koltan- ja Kuolanlapin Sanakirja I-II (Wörterbuch des Kolta- und Kolalappischen) [Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae XV]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
2008 Finnish: An Essential Grammar [Routledge Essential Grammars]. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kulonen, Ulla-Maija, Seurujärvi-Kari, Irja & Pulkkinen, Risto
(eds) 2005 The Saami: A Cultural Encyclopaedia [Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 925]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D.
(eds) 2014 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. http://​www​.ethnologue​.com (23 July 2014).
Moshnikoff, Satu, Moshnikoff, Jouni & Koponen, Eino
2009 Koltansaamen Koulukielioppi (Sääʹmǩiõl Ǩiõllvuäʹppes Škoouʹli Vääras). Inari: Saamelaiskäräjät.Google Scholar
Mosnikoff, Satu
1992 Maaddârääʹjji mainnâz. Utsjoki: Girjegiisá Oy.Google Scholar
Nelson, Diane & Toivonen, Ida
2007 Introduction. In Saami linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 288], Ida Toivonen & Diane Nelson (eds), 167–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998 The Saami Languages: An Introduction. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka & Mosnikoff, Jouni
1991 Suomi – Koltansaame Sanakirja (Lääʹdd – Sääʹm Sääʹnnǩeʹrjj). Utsjoki: Girjegiisá.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 Depictive Secondary Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Linguistic Typology 8(1): 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Joshua
2014 A Grammar of Pite Saami. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar