Cover not available
Part of
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 497–549

Chapter 21
The typology of the essive in the Uralic Languages

This chapters presents the typology of the essive in the Uralic languages. The input for the typology is the detailed information about the essive in nineteen Uralic languages presented in the former chapters of this volume. The chapter specifically investigates the distribution of the essives and also the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The typological variation is discussed within the linguistic domains of non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is contrasted with its use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change). The syntactic position of elements marked by the essive is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents. The conclusions summarize the major findings of this volume.
Keywords: linguistic typology, Uralic languages, essive case, translative case, depictive, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, focus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Essive and translative: Form and function
  • 3.Impermanent versus permanent state
    • 3.1Differential marking
    • 3.2Restrictions
      • 3.2.1Nominal and adjectival predicates
      • 3.2.2Tense
      • 3.2.3Other
      • 3.2.4Conclusions of this section
  • 4.Copula, semi-copula, essive, and translative
    • 4.1Copula
    • 4.2Semi-copula
    • 4.3Converb of ‘be’
    • 4.4Modal verbs
    • 4.5Conclusions of this section
  • 5.The essive in secondary predications
    • 5.1Depictives
      • 5.1.1The marking of nominal and adjectival depictives in Uralic
      • 5.1.2The marking of numeral depictives in Uralic
      • 5.1.3Resultatives
      • 5.1.4Conclusions of this section
  • 6.Predicative complements
  • 7.Essives in adverbial phrases
    • 7.1Manner
    • 7.2Temporal adverbial phrases
    • 7.3Circumstantial adverbial phrases
    • 7.4Locational adverbial phrases
    • 7.5Comparative and simile expressions
    • 7.6Conclusions of this section
  • 8.Word order
  • 9.The application of the essive questionnaire to non-Uralic languages
  • 10.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.21deg
References (26)
References
Ariste, Paul. 1968. A Grammar of the Votic Language. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1988. General features of the Uralic Languages. In Sinor (ed.), 451–477.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Non-verbal predicates. In Studies in Functional Grammar, Simon C. Dik, 90–112. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati & Metslang, Helle. 2003. Case marking of the predicative in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 39(3): 166–174.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Pål Kristian. 2006. On the Typology and the Semantics of Non-verbal Predication. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
de Groot, Casper. Forthcoming. The essive in Hixkaryana.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Terminology. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts. An introduction. In Himmelmann & Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Gildea, Spike. 2009. Property concepts in the Cariban family: Adjectives, adverbs and/or nouns? In The Linguistics of Endangered Languages – Contributions to Morphology and Morphosyntax, W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), 95–133. Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne & Wagner-Nagy, Beáta. 2015. Negation in Uralic languages – Introduction. In Negation in Uralic languages, Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm & Beáta Wagner-Nagy (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Joanna. 1978. Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 114–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2014. A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nose, Masahiko. 2003. Word order positions of the Finno-Ugric essive case forms. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 2: 103–114.Google Scholar
Planck, Franz. 1985. Prädikativ und Koprädikativ. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 13(2): 154–185.Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina. 2003. Copulas. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Depictive secondary predicates. Linguistic Typology 8(1): 59–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegl, Florian. 2013. Materials on Forest Enets. An Indigenous Language of Northern Siberia [MSFOu 267]. Helsinki: Finno-Ugric Society.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. Nonverbal predication in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Circum-Baltic Languages, Vol 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 55], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 569–590. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1985. The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turunen, Rigina. 2013. Linguistic questionnaire Essive; Erzya. Ms.Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria. 1998. Word order in European Uralic. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 173–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzer, Harrie. 1996. The Typology of Adjectival Predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Working Group Functional Grammar. 1981. The functional grammar of teaching verbs. In Perspectives on Functional Grammar, Teun Hoekstra, Harry van der Hulst & Michael Moortgat (eds), 203–231. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Siegl, Florian
2022. Prädikative Kasus und depiktive sekundäre Prädikation in Nordeurasien - eine Vorstudie unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Tundrajukagirischen. In Siberica et Uralica, ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.