Valency-changing operations in Yaqui resultatives
This paper describes the resultative constructions existing in Yaqui (Uto-Aztecan) and discusses the valency issues involved in these constructions. The study shows that Yaqui has five different syntactic types of resultatives: S-, A- and bivalent S-resultatives marked by the suffix -(l)a, and P- and R-resultatives marked by the suffix -(r)i. The analysis of the different valency-changing operations present in these constructions demonstrates that the -(l)a resultativization does not trigger a valency change, contrary to the -(r)i resultativization that always implies a valency decreasing operation. More specifically, it is shown that P-resultatives and personal passives exhibit a functional overlap, that R-resultatives are derived from an applicative construction, and that the bivalent S-resultative is in fact an externally possessed S-resultative that can be considered an external possession construction if the base verb is a non-derived intransitive verb root and if the possessive relation is an inanimate inalienable possession. As for the suffix -la used in A-resultatives, some evidences indicate that it is in the process of being grammaticalized as a perfect/anterior marker in Yaqui.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
-
2.Yaqui language
-
3.Resultative constructions
- 4.Resultative constructions in Yaqui
- 4.1Monovalent resultatives in Yaqui
-
4.1.1S-resultative in Yaqui
- 4.1.2P-resultative in Yaqui
- 4.1.3Relationship between P-resultative and passive in Yaqui
- 4.1.4Triggering feature for the Yaqui monovalent resultative marking
- 4.2Bivalent resultatives in Yaqui
- 4.2.1A-resultative in Yaqui
- 4.2.2Relationship between A-resultative and perfect in Yaqui
- 4.2.3R-resultative in Yaqui and its relationship with applicative
-
4.2.4Bivalent S-resultative
- 4.2.5Relationship between bivalent S-resultative and external possession
- 5.Final remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (31)
References
Álvarez González, Albert
2007 Construcciones de aspecto resultativo en yaqui. In
Mecanismos de voz y formación de palabra,
Zarina Estrada Fernández,
Albert Álvarez González,
Lilián Guerrero &
María Belén Carpio (eds), 17–44. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Álvarez González, Albert
2010 Eventos no-agentivos, alternancia causativo/incoativo y gramaticalización en lengua yaqui.
Lingüística Mexicana IV(2007): 5–30.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992 A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Aspect and voice: Some reflexions on perfect and passive. In
Tense and Aspect [Syntax and Semantics 14],
Philip J. Tedeschi &
Annie Zaenen (eds), 65–78. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
1990 Possible verbs and the structure of events. In
Meanings and Prototypes,
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 48–73. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987 On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garey, Howard B.
1957 Verbal aspects in French.
Language 33: 91–110.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guerrero, Lilián
2007 Estructuras argumentales alternativas: Las cláusulas aplicativas en yaqui. In
Mecanismos de voz y formación de palabra,
Zarina Estrada Fernández,
Albert Álvarez González,
Lilián Guerrero &
María Belén Carpio (eds), 177–204. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin & Müller-Bardey, Thomas
2001 Valency change. In
Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach‑ und Kommunikationswissenschaft],
Geert Booij,
Christian Lehmann &
Joachim Mugdan (eds), 1130–1145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1992 From resultative to perfect in ancient Greek.
Función 11–12: 187–224.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2002 Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology.
Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard
2001 Internal and external possessor. In
Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2,
Martin Haspelmath,
Ekkehard König,
Wulf Oesterreicher &
Wolfgang Raible (eds), 970–978. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard & Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues de l’Europe. In
Actance et Valence dans les langues de l’Europe,
Jack Feuillet (ed.), 525–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej L.
1995 Even. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen
2011 Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking.
Lingua 121: 35–47.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin, Haspelmath & Bernard, Comrie
2010 Ditransitive construction: A typological overview. In
Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook,
Andrej L. Malchukov,
Martin Haspelmath, &
Bernard Comrie (eds), 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maslov, Jurij S.
1988 Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In
Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Languages 12],
Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P .
2001
Resultative constructions. In
Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2,
Martin Haspelmath,
Ekkehard König,
Wulf Oesterreicher &
Wolfgang Raible (eds), 928–940. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je.
Payne, Doris & Barshi, Immanuel
(eds) 1999 External Possession [Typological Studies in Language 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis.
Language 61: 821–848.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, Gregory T.
1998 Inflection. In
The Handbook of Morphology,
Andrew Spencer &
Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 13–43. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
1989 Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.