Cover not available
Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 227–255

The antipassive marking in Mocoví

Forms and functions

| University of Texas at Austin
| Universidad de Sonora
This paper presents the two different antipassive markers (suffixes -(a)ɢan and -(a)taɢan) that can be observed in Mocoví, addressing both their forms and functions. Besides the morphosyntactic, semantic and pragmatic features that are synchronically involved in Mocoví antipassive constructions, the study considers the functional overlaps between these two antipassive markings and causative, aspectual and agentive nominal meanings. Based on these characteristics, it will be proposed that the primary functions of both suffixes are to highlight the predicate activity and to downgrade the object/patient participant and thereby, as a consequence, to focus on the participant that carries out this activity, that is, the subject/agent. As Mocoví is a non-ergative language, this paper also contributes to the typological discussion about the relation between antipassives and ergativity, confirming that the marked antipassive construction is not exclusive of ergative languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mocoví language and data
  • 3.Antipassive constructions
    • 3.1Definition and functions
  • 4.Main features of the active clause in Mocoví
    • 4.1The nominal phrases and independent pronouns coding
    • 4.2Verbal indexing
    • 4.3Word order
  • 5.The Mocoví antipassive
    • 5.1The -(a)ɢan marker
      • 5.1.1-(a)ɢan as an antipassive marker
      • 5.1.2The -(a)ɢan antipassive-causative syncretism
    • 5.2The -(a)taɢan marker
      • 5.2.1-(a)taɢan as an antipassive marker
      • 5.2.2The -(a)taɢan marker and the overlap with agentive nominal meaning and aspect
    • 5.3Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.120.09jua
References (37)
References
Álvarez González, Albert. 2017 this volume. Valency-changing operations in Yaqui resultatives. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives, Albert Álvarez González & Ía Navarro (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bostoen, Koen, Dom, Sebastian & Segerer, Guillaume. 2015. The antipassive in Bantu. Linguistics 53(4): 731–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckwalter, Alberto. 1995. Vocabulario Mocoví. Elkhart: Mennonite Board of Missions.Google Scholar
Carrió, Cintia. 2009. Mirada generativa a la lengua mocoví (familia guaycurú). PhD dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba.Google Scholar
. 2015. Construcciones causativas y anticausativas en Mocoví. Liames. Línguas Indígenas Americanas 15(1): 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Censabella, Marisa. 2009. IV Chaco Ampliado. In Atlas Sociolingüístico de los pueblos indígenas en América Latina, Inge Sichra (ed.), Ecuador: UNICEF & FUNPROEIB Andes.Google Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine. 2008. Voz antipasiva en lenguas nominativo-acusativas. El caso del purépecha. Paper presented at the IX Encuentro de Lingüística en el Noroeste Hermosillo.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactiv Typology, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed), 329–394. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann M. 1988. Antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. A functional typology of antipassive. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27] Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm, 29 August-1 September 2012. <[URL]>
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). 2000. Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Alain. 2006. Los pueblos del Gran Chaco y sus lenguas, tercera parte: Los guaykurú. Suplemento Antropológico 41(2): 7–132.Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard. 1985. Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondona, Verónica. 1998. A Grammar of Mocoví. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburg PA.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. LʹAntipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juárez, Cristian. 2013. Sistemas de alineación en el mocoví (guaycurú) hablado en Colonia Aborigen (Chaco, Argentina). MA thesis, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam. 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2011. Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 368–398. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Machukov, Andrej L. 2017 this volume. Markedness effects in applicative formation. In Verb Valency Change: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives, Albert Álvarez González & Ía Navarro (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peralta Ramírez, Valentin. 2013. Construcciones de doble objeto en el nawat de Pajapan, Veracruz. Paper presented at the Seminario de Complejidad Sintáctica, Hermosillo, Sonora.
Polinsky, Maria. 2005. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), Ch. 108 , 438–441. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44(2): 2 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1972. Chinook jargon: Language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems, Part I; Language 48: 378–406, Part II, Language 48: 596–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina. 2010. On the conditions for antipassive. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7): 556–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie. 2011. Understanding Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Heaton, Raina
2021. Grammatical voice. Linguistic Typology 25:1 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Navarro, Ia
2017. The semantics of Nahuatl tla- constructions. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Peregrina Llanes, Manuel, Albert Álvarez González & Zarina Estrada-Fernández
2017. Transitivity and valency-changing operations in Huasteca Nahuatl. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.