Chapter published in:
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 258284
References

References

Benmamoun, Elabbas, Aoun, Joseph E. & Choueiri, Lina
2010The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis & Maurice Gaudefroy-Demombynes
1952Grammaire de lʹarabe classique. Paris: G. P. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis
1958Elements de l’arabe classique. Paris: G. P. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Process 10: 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2006Transitivity pairs, markedness, and diachronic stability. Linguistics 44(2): 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2014P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics 52(4): 911–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael A., Ganenkov, Dmitri V. & Merdanova, Solmaz R.
2012Causatives in Agul. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A crosslinguistic typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie and Valery Solovyev (eds), 55–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1980Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader
2012Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 182]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galiamina, Yulia
2006Transitivity and lability in Songhay. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid I. Kulikov, Andrei L. Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 359–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grande, Bentsion M.
1998Kurs arabskoj grammatiki v sravnitel’no-istoričeskom osveščenii (Course of Arabic grammar in historical and comparative perspective). Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra
1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakovlev, Nikolaj F. & Ašhamaf, Daud A.
1941Grammatika adygejskogo literaturnogo jazyka (A grammar of literary Adyghe). Moscow: Izdatel′stvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Kehayov, Petar & Virve Vihman
2014The lure of lability: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the labile pattern in Estonian. Linguistics 52(4): 1061–1106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander E., Muravyeva, Irina A. & Kodzasov, Sandro V.
2001Jazyk i fol’klor alutorcev (Alutor language and folklore). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Khrakovskij, Viktor S.
2011Kauzativnaja derivacija: osobyj slučaj (The causative derivation: A special case). In Meždunarodnaja konferencija, posvjaščennaja 50-letiju Peterburgskoj tipologičeskoj školy: Materialy i tezisy dokladov (International conference, dedicated to the 50th anniversary of Saint-Petersburg Typological School. Proceedings and abstracts), Viktor S. Khrakovskij, Sergei Yu. Dmitrenko, Alexander K. Ogloblin & Natalia M. Spatar (eds), 184–192. Saint-Petersburg: ILI RAN.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I.
1999May he prosper in offspring and wealth: A few jubilee remarks on the typology of labile verbs and Sanskrit púsyati ʹprospers; makes prosperʹ. In Tipologija i teorija jazyka: Ot opisanija k objasneniju (Typology and language theory: From description to explanation), Yakov G. Testelets & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds), 224–244. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. & Lavidas, Nikolaos
(eds) 2014Typology of Labile Verbs: Focus on Diachrony. Special issue of Linguistics 52(4).Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander B.
2006Tipologija labil’nyx glagolov: semantičeskije i morfosintaksičeskije aspekty (Typology of labile verbs: Semantic and morphosyntactic aspects). PhD dissertation. Moscow.Google Scholar
2010Lability and spontaneity. In Transitivity: Form, Meaning, Acquisition, and Processing [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 166], Patrick Brandt & Marco García García (eds), 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Tipologija labil’nyx glagolov (Typology of labile verbs). Moscow: Yazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 26]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard
(eds) 2010Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1969Nekotoryje verojatnosnyje universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii (Some probabilistic universals in verbal derivation). In Jazykovyje universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija (Language universals and linguistic typology), Igor F. Vardul’ (ed.), 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Johnatan
2004Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 149–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prost, Alain
1956La langue songay et ses dialectes. Dakar: IFAN.Google Scholar
Rožanskij, Fedor I.
1991O tranzitivnosti i intranzitivnosti v jazyke songaj (On transitivity and intransitivity in Songhay). In Afrika: Kul’tura, etničnost’, jazyk, 179–187. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija.Google Scholar
Saad, George Nehweh
1982Transitivity, Causation and Passivization. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Scheka, Yury V.
1999Intensivnyj kurs tureckogo jazyka (An intensive course of Turkish). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1985Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21: 385–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Halevy, Rivka
2020.  In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210],  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.