A central issue in typology is the role of implicational hierarchies
in shaping individual languages. One view is that the hierarchies
guide language change, or at least constrain it: “Since a hierarchy
constrains what is a possible language, it is also a constraint on
language change, because languages move from one possible state to
another” (Corbett 2011).
Other approaches take a different perspective: “Hierarchies simply
capture the outputs of independent diachronic processes” (Cristofaro & Zúñiga this
volume). Here the relationship between typology and
diachrony is examined with respect to the most frequently-cited
hierarchies, the cluster of Referential/Topicality/Animacy/Empathy
hierarchies. While such hierarchies might appear to drive diachronic
development in some single-step changes, multi-step developments are
a different matter.
2010On the scope of the referential hierarchy in the
typology of grammatical relations. In Case and Grammatical Relations. Papers in Honor of
Bernard Comrie, Greville Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 191–210. Oxford: OUP.
Corbett, Greville
2011Implicational hierarchies. In The Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 190–205. Oxford: OUP.
Creissels, Denis
2008Direct and indirect explanations of typological
regularities: The case of alignment
variations. Folia Linguistica 42: 1–38.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2013The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence
in diachronic perspective. In Language across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna
Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 69–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular
reference to the order of meaningful
elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Heizer, Robert
1978California. Volume 8: Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, ed. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
Jacobs, Melville
1939Coos narrative and ethnologic
texts. University of Washington Publications in
Anthropology 8(1): 1–126.
Jacobs, Melville
1940Coos myth texts. University of Washington Publications in
Anthropology 8(2): 127–360.
Kopris, Craig
2001A Grammar and Dictionary of
Wyandot. PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.
Langacker, Ronald
1977
Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar,
Vol. 1: An Overview of Uto-Aztecan
Grammar [SIL Publications in Linguistics 56]. Dallas TX: SIL and University of Texas at Arlington.
McGregor, William
2006Focal and optional ergative marking in Warrwa
(Kimberly, Western Australia). Lingua 116: 393–423.
McLaughlin, John
2013Central Numic innovations in dual number
marking. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual
Meeting, Boston.
Mithun, Marianne
2005Ergativity and language contact on the Oregon
Coast: Alsea, Siuslaw, and Coos. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26: 77–95. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Mithun, Marianne
2013Prosody and independence: Free and bound person
marking. In Language across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna
Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 291–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Montgomery-Anderson, Brad
2008A Reference Grammar of Oklahoma
Cherokee. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Moravcsik, Edith
1974Object-verb agreement. Working Papers on Language Universals 15: 25–140. Stanford CA: Stanford University.
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and
ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Smith-Stark, T. Cedric
1974The plurality split. Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, Michael La Galy, Robert Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds), 657–71. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
Verbeke, Saartje
2013Alignment and Ergativity in New Indo-Aryan
Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic
2009The rise of ergativity in Hindi: Assessing the
role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30:1–24.
2022. Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 33 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.