Cover not available
Part of
Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages
Edited by Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos and Spike Gildea
[Typological Studies in Language 122] 2018
► pp. 135–162

Chapter 5
Nonverbal predicates and copula constructions in Aguaruna (Chicham)

| University of Otago | James Cook University
This chapter focuses primarily on the formal expression of equative, proper inclusion and attributive relations in Aguaruna, all three of which are encoded as copula clauses. The copula clause involves two arguments that both take nominative case; the copula element may be a full verb, it may be an enclitic to the copula complement argument, or the clause may be truly verbless, formed by simple juxtaposition of the arguments. The copula verb itself is homophonous with an existential verb that forms a simple intransitive clause, and a few other intransitive verbs may also function as copulas. Finally, I show that the formal structures associated with copula clauses also feature in auxiliary constructions and as a means of marking finite verbal categories in clauses with nominalized verbs.
Keywords: copula, verbless clause, nominalization, auxiliation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Clause types in Aguaruna
    • 2.1Transitivity and grammatical relations
      • Subject
      • Object
      • Copula complement
    • 2.2Finiteness
  • 3.Copula clauses
  • 4.The enclitic copula construction
    • 4.1Person and number of subject
    • 4.2Tense and aspect
    • 4.3Mood
    • 4.4Polarity
    • 4.5Non finite clause types
    • 4.6Summary of the enclitic copula construction
  • 5.The verbless clause construction
  • 6.The verbal copula
    • 6.1Copula and existential
    • 6.2Other copula verbs
  • 7.Copula constructions beyond copula clauses
  • 8.Concluding comments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations and conventions
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.05ove
References (15)
References
Bresnan, Joan & Moshi, Lioba. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147–185.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gnerre, Maurizio. 1973. Sources of Spanish Jívaro . Romance Philology 27(2): 203–204.Google Scholar
INEI [Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática]. 2009. Resumen Ejecutivo: Resultados definitivos de las comunidades indígenas. <[URL]>
Katan Jua, Tuntiak. 2011. Ii chichame unuimiamu / Investigando nuestra lengua / Investigating our language: Shuar Chicham. In Endangered Languages: Voices and Images. Proceedings of the FEL XV Conference, Marleen Haboud & Nicholas Ostler (eds), 103–105. Hungerford: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, Olga. 2012. The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon E. 2007. A Grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
2014. Nominalization, knowledge and information source in Aguaruna (Jivaroan). In The Grammar of Knowledge, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 227–244. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Attributive adjectives and the internal syntax of the NP in Jivaroan. In A estrutura do sintagma nominal em línguas amazônicas, Francesc Queixalós & Dioney M. Gomes (eds), 29–43. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
2017a. A Grammar of Aguaruna (Iiniá Chicham). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017b. The grammatical representation of commands and prohibitions in Aguaruna. In Commands: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 61–82. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 2001. Review of Dixon & Aikhenvald (1999) The Amazonian Languages . Language 77(3): 594–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Saad, George M. 2014. A Grammar Sketch of Shuar: With a Focus on the Verb Phrase. MA thesis, MPI Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
2019. Two types of morphologically expressed non-verbal predication. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.