Cover not available
Part of
Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages
Edited by Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos and Spike Gildea
[Typological Studies in Language 122] 2018
► pp. 317–338

Chapter 12
Constructions with has(a) in Wampis

| Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
This paper analyzes the development of a copular element has(a) ‘become’ in Wampis. Has(a) can occur as a fully inflected verb or as an invariant copula particle. Based on comparative evidence, it is argued that this morpheme has arisen from the phonetic reduction of a posture verb stem meaning ‘stand’, likely through the use of this verb in locative and existential predicates. The form and semantics of has(a), as well as its use in different constructions associated with it are further analyzed taking into account both structural and functional characteristics. Has(a) is used for expressing the functions of proper inclusion and attribution, as well as for temporal and locative predicates. Has(a) can also serve to express translation and change in physical location, drawing on syntactic structures typically associated with verbs of movement in the language. The latter is an interesting development given the stative historical source of has(a).
Keywords: Wampis, copular constructions, grammaticalization, posture verbs, semantic expansion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Brief background of the Wampis language
  • 3.Copular constructions in Wampis
  • 4.The verb has(a) in Wampis
  • 5.On the diachrony of has(a) ‘become’
  • 6.The form and meaning of has(a) in Wampis
    • 6.1 has(a) as a verb
    • 6.2Particularities and restrictions of has(a)
  • 7. Has as a particle: NP/ADJP has V
  • 8.Further developments of has
    • 8.1The construction NP NP/AdjP has
    • 8.2Temporal and locational uses of has
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.12pen
References (23)
References
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2006. Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corbera Mori, Ángel. 1994. Fonologia e gramática do Aguaruna (Jívaro). PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.Google Scholar
. 1995. A queda de vogais no Aguaruna. In Actas de las II Jornadas de Lingüística Aborigen, 139–45. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Fast, Gerhard, Warkentin de Fast, Ruby & Fast Warkentin, Daniel. 1996. Diccionario Achuar-Shiwiar~Castellano. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación/Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In Word Order and Word Order Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 47–112. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gnerre, Maurizio. 2010. Perfil descriptivo e histórico-comparativo de una lengua amazónica: El Shuar (Jíbaro). Bilbao: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (Universidad del País Vasco).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language 22(2): 315–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Frederieke. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-Verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katan Jua, Tuntiak. 2011. Ii Chichame unuimiamu/Investigando nuestra lengua/Investigating our language: Shuar Chicham. In Endangered Languages: Voices and Images. Proceedings of the FEL XV Annual Conference, Marleen Haboud & Nicholas Ostler (eds), 103–105. Bath: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Larson, Mildred L. 1963. Emic classes which manifest the obligatory tagmemes in major independent clause types of Aguaruna (Jivaro). In Studies in Peruvian Indian Languages 1, Viola G. Waterhouse (ed.), 1–36. Norman OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
1985. Funciones del discurso directo en narraciones Aguarunas. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Newman, John. 2002. A cross-linguistic overwiev of the posture verbs ‘sit’, ‘stand’ and ‘lie’. In The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying [Typological Studies in Language 51], John Newman (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overall, Simon. 2007. A Grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1989. Extrametricalidad y acento tonal en el Aguaruna. In Temas de lingüística Amerindia, Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino & Gustavo Solís Fonseca (eds), 251–72. Lima: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.Google Scholar
1990. Accent in Aguaruna. In Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages, Doris L. Payne (ed.), 161–84. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peña, Jaime. 2015a. A Grammar of Wampis. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
. 2015b. The expression of locational relations in Wampis. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the Americas (SSILA) Annual Meeting, January.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2009. Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t: The case of relativization. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], T. Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Glen D. 1958. Jivaro Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
1992. Una breve gramática del Shuar. Quito: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar