Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 455–490

Chapter 12
Nominalization in Harakmbut

| University of Liège & University of Leuven

This paper focusses on verb-based nominalization in Harakmbut (isolate, Peru), which falls into two formal types on the basis of the prefix used. The first type, using the nominalizing prefix wa(ʔ)-, is restricted to participant nominalization and is predominantly used to produce nouns for NP-use. The second type, using the nominalizing prefix e(ʔ)-, is mainly used for event nominalization and typically produces multi-word nominalizations. Depending on the constructions they occur in and additional suffixation they take, nominalizations with e(ʔ)- can serve complementation as well as adverbial functions. Across the two formal types, multi-word nominalizations combine NP-like external syntax with verb-like internal syntax. The two nominalizing prefixes also serve a basic function in noun-based nominalization, lending independent status to obligatorily bound nouns.

Article outline
  • 1.The Harakmbut language and collection of data
  • 2.Nominalization in Harakmbut
  • 3.Basic features of Harakmbut grammar
  • 4.Nominalization with prefix wa(ʔ)-
    • 4.1Animate referents
    • 4.2Inanimate referents
  • 5.Nominalization with prefix e(ʔ)-
    • 5.1Complement relations
      • 5.1.1Commentative predicates
      • 5.1.2Ability predicates
      • 5.1.3Immediate perception predicates
      • 5.1.4Desiderative predicates
    • 5.2Adverbial relations
      • 5.2.1Temporal relations
      • 5.2.2Concessive relations
      • 5.2.3Conditional relations
      • 5.2.4Locative relations
    • 5.3Participant nominalization
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.12lin
References
Adelaar, Willem
2000 Propuesta de un nuevo vínculo genético entre dos grupos lingüísticos indígenas de la Amazonía occidental: Harakmbut y Katukina. In Actas del I Congreso de Lenguas Indígenas de Sudamérica, Vol. 2, Luis Miranda Esquerre (ed.), 219–236. Lima: Universidad Ricardo Palma.Google Scholar
2007 Ensayo de clasificación del katawixí dentro del conjunto harakmbut-katukina. In Lenguas indígenas de América del Sur: Estudios descriptivo-tipológicos y sus contribuciones para la lingüística teórica, Andrés Romero-Figueroa, Ana Fernández Garay & Angel Corbera Mori (eds), 159–169. Caracas: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Classifiers. A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery
2007 Relative clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 206–236. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anjos Gonçalves da Silva, Zoraide dos
2011 Fonologia e gramática Katukina-Kanamari [LOT Series 281]. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A.
2007 Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334–381. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily & van der Voort, Hein
2008 The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90] Pieter Muysken (ed.), 151–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003 Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin
(eds) 2013 The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Stefanie
2011 Differential agent marking and animacy. Lingua 121: 533–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine
2008 A Grammar of Cavineña [Mouton Grammar Library 44]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Andrew
1996 The Arakmbut: Mythology, Spirituality and History. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Hart, Raymond
1963 Semantic components of shape in Amarakaeri grammar. Anthropological Linguistics 5(9): 1–7.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Helberg Chávez, Heinrich A.
1984 Skizze einer Grammatik des Amarakaeri. PhD dissertation, Tübingen University.Google Scholar
1990 Análisis functional del verbo amarakaeri. In Temas de lingüística amerindia, Rodolfo Cerrón Palomino & Gustavo Solís Fonseca (eds), 227–249. Lima: Concytec.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert & Thompson, Sandra A.
1976 The role of pragmatic inference in semantics: A study of sensory verb complements in English. Glossa 10: 200–240.Google Scholar
Matteson, Esther
1972 Proto Arawakan. In Comparative Studies in Amerindian Languages, Esther Matteson, Alva Wheeler, Frances L. Jackson, Nathan E. Waltz & Diana R. Christian (eds), 160–242. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2007 Ergative marking of intransitive subjects in Warrwa. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27(2): 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120: 1610–1636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuown, Norman A.
1955 Indigenous Languages of Latin America. American Anthropologist 57: 501–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–879. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Denny
2007 Endangered languages of lowland tropical South America. In Language Diversity Endangered, Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), 29–58. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2007 Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L.
1987 Noun classification in the Western Amazon. Language Sciences 9(1): 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pozzi-Escot, Inés
(ed.) 1998 El Multilingüismo en el Perú. Cuzco: CBC-SID.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2007 The prehistory of nominal classification in Witotan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(4): 411–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja J.
2007 Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 237–300. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Robert
1976 Sustantivos verbales y frases de sustantivos verbales en Amarakaeri. In 14. Datos Etno-Lingüísticos: Colección de los archivos del ILV 50. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
1995 Diccionario amarakaeri-castellano. Yarinacocha: Min. de Educación & Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein
2005 Kwaza in a comparative perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 71 (4): 365–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter
2011 Subordination in South America: an overview. In Subordination in native South American languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An
2004 A typological study of counterfactuality. MA dissertation, University of Leuven. (KU Leuven). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Modal Adjectives: English Deontic and Evaluative Constructions in Diachrony and Synchrony [Topics in English Linguistics 75]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Argument marking in Harakmbut: Looking for referential transparency. Paper presented at Syntax of the World’s Languages VI, 8–10 September 2014, University of Pavia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An.
Forthcoming Harakmbut. In Amazonian Languages. An International Handbook, Patience Epps & Lev Michael (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Van linden, An & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2008 The nature and origins of counterfactuality in simple clauses: Cross-linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1865–1895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An & Davidse, Kristin
2009 The clausal complementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extraposition constructions: A synchronic-diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 175–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wise, Mary R.
1999 Small language families and isolates in Peru. In The Amazonian languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 307–340. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cheng, Jie
2022. The ambiguity with pa-nominalization in Lhasa Tibetan. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 23:4 ► pp. 644 ff. DOI logo
Van linden, An
2020. Constructional effects of indirect evidential marking in Harakmbut. Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Van linden, An
2023. When the alienability contrast fails to surface in adnominal possession: bound nouns in Harakmbut. Linguistics 61:6 ► pp. 1533 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.