Cover not available
Part of
Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity
Edited by Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández and Claudine Chamoreau
[Typological Studies in Language 126] 2019
► pp. 139–166

Grammaticalization of the linking devices with ka in Purepecha

| CNRS (SEDYL/CELIA – CEMCA
This paper describes, in synchrony, the use, form, and position of the linking devices with ka in coordinating phrases and clauses and in subordinate clauses. This study also explores the relation between the different occurrences of ka and investigates a diachronic common source. Taking into account such parameters as weight, cohesion, and variability (Lehmann 2002), I advance the hypothesis that there have been two routes of grammaticalization. These two routes include the free coordinator ka which has given rise to a dependent marker -ka that forms subordinators, and the subjunctive mood -ka which seems to be the grammaticalization of the assertive mood marker -ka used for speech-act participants.
Keywords: grammaticalization, Purepecha, coordination, subordination, linker, coordinator
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic typological characteristics of Purepecha
  • 3.Coordinator ka
    • 3.1General properties and interphrastic uses
    • 3.2Interclausal uses
      • 3.2.1Coordinated finite clauses
      • 3.2.2Coordinated non-finite chain-medial clauses
  • 4. ka used in subordinate finite clauses
    • 4.1 -ka at the beginning of the subordinate clause: Different kinds of subordinator
    • 4.2 -ka at the end of the subordinate clause: A compulsory suffix on the verb
  • 5.Conclusion: Two hypotheses about the source and grammaticalization of ka
    • Stage 1. Coordinator of two words or noun phrases
    • Stage 2. Coordinator of verb phrases
    • Stage 3. Coordinator of finite clauses
    • Stage 4. Coordinator of chain-medial clauses
    • Stage 5. Marker at the beginning of a subordinate clause
    • The specific route of the subjunctive mood
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.126.06cha
References
Bril, Isabelle & Rebuschi, Georges
2006 Coordination, subordination et co-jonction: Faits linguistiques et concepts. Faits de Langues 28: 7–20.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Capistrán, Alejandra
2002 Variaciones de orden de constituyentes en p’orhépecha. Topicalización y focalización. In Del Cora al Maya Yucateco. Estudios lingüísticos sobre algunas lenguas indígenas mexicanas, Paulette Levy (ed.), 349–402. México: UNAM.Google Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine
2004 Localización de espacios utilizando deícticos en purepecha. In VII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noreste, Isabel Barreras Aguilar & Mirna Castro Llamas (eds), 531–554. Hermosillo: UniSon.Google Scholar
2007 Grammatical borrowing in Purepecha. In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds), 465–480. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009  Hablemos purepecha, Wanté juchari anapu . Morelia: Universidad Intercultural Indígenas de Michoacán / IIH-UMSNH / IRD / CCC-IFAL / Grupo Kw’anískuyarhani de Estudiosos del Pueblo Purépecha.Google Scholar
2012 Dialectology, typology, diachrony and contact linguistics. A multi-layered perspective in Purepecha. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF – Language Typology and Universals) 65(1): 6–25.Google Scholar
2014 Types of enclitic in Purepecha. In Patterns in Meso-American Morphology, Jean-Léo Léonard & Alain Kihm (eds), 119–143. Paris: Michel Houdiard Editeur.Google Scholar
2016 Non-finite chain-medial clauses in the continuum of finiteness in Purepecha. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada Fernández (eds), 83–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017 Purepecha. A polysynthetic but predominantly dependent-marking language. In Handbook of Polysynthesis, Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds), 667–695. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003 Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Foley, William & Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1984 Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul
1975 A Phonology of Tarascan. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1984 From meaning to sound. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 2, Munro S. Edmonson (ed.), 56–82. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Mauri, Caterina
2011 The grammaticalization of coordinating interclausal connective. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 656–667. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gilberti, Maturino
1987[1558]. Arte de la lengua de Michuacan. Morelia: Fimax Publicistas Editores.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
2001  Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995 The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective , Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 Coordination. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol.2, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1–51. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The Genesis of Grammar. A Reconstruction. Oxford. OUP.Google Scholar
de Lagunas, Juan Baptista
1983[1574]. Arte y Diccionario con otras obras en lengua Michuacana. Morelia: Fimax.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002[1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd rev. edn. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert
2007 Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
1998 Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics 36(2): 281–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The borrowability of structural categories. In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds), 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Medina Plaza Juan
1998[1575]. Dialogo sobre la naturaleza. Zamora: El Colegio de Michoacán y Fideicomiso Teixidor.Google Scholar
Monzón, Cristina
2004 Los morfemas espaciales del p’urhépecha. Zamora: El Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas
1994 Mesoamerican calques. In Investigaciones lingüísticas en Mesoamérica, Carolyn Mackay & Verónica Vázquez (eds), 15–50. Mexico: IIF-UNAM.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, Longacre, Robert & Hwang, Shin Ja
2007 Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 237–300. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wares, Alan
1984 Tarascan Verb Inflection, 93–100. Mexico: SIL.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chamoreau, Claudine
2016. Non-finite chain-medial clauses on the continuum of finiteness in Purepecha. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language, 113], ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.