Chapter 13
Robust argument phrases (DPs) but unruly NPs in Maa
Maa (sometimes referred to as Maasai) discourse and syntax largely require determined phrases. NP is not a robust construction in Maa, partly because ‘noun’ is not highly distinguished morphosyntactically from ‘adjective.’ Either can be a syntactic argument just if preceded by a determiner; ‘ablity to serve as an argument’ does not correspond to a lexical N or NP category. The paper proposes a definition of ‘determiner’, which includes Maa demonstratives and gender+number proclitics. The latter do not signal identifiability, givenness, or referentiality. Gender is not lexical feature of most noun/adjective stems, but is specified by whatever determiner is used. The determiners appear to help hearers cognitively establish a referent based on attributed gender (sometimes at the moment of speech), and make a phrase able to serve as an argument.
Article outline
- 1.The problem and background
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Definitional challenges
- 3.1Common criteria for ‘noun’ and ‘noun phrase’
- 3.2Criteria for ‘determiner’
- 4.The Maa determiner function
- 5.Properties of Maa word bases that refer and modify
- 5.1Properties that group time-stable and Type I property-concept terms
- 5.2Order within the nominal phrase template
- 5.2.1Immediately after a determiner
- 5.2.2Lexemes in Position 1 or Position 2
- 5.2.3Order after the noun within the nominal phrase template
- 5.3Complement of a ‘be’ verb
- 5.4Perfect(ive) aspect morphology, inchoative aspect morphology, and morphological causative morphology
- 5.5Modification by olêŋ ‘very’
- 6.Maa DPs as arguments and referring phrases in discourse
- 6.1Maa DPs as arguments and in syntax
- 6.2Maa proclitic determiners in discourse
- 6.3Contexts in which determiners are omitted
- 7.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References