Chapter published in:
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 97–148

Chapter 4
Aspect and modality in Pama-Nyungan antipassives

| University of Toronto
I present data from Pama-Nyungan languages that display aspectual and modal readings in the antipassive construction, and propose that antipassives contain a predicate-internal aspectual morpheme that derives an atelic predicate. Taking a modal approach to aspect unifies the aspectual and modal readings. I detail the striking resemblance between the set of interpretations attested in antipassives and imperfectives more generally, and show how the compositional analysis I propose is able to provide insight into unexpected volitional and “total effect” readings.
Keywords: antipassives, imperfectives, telicity, modality, Australian Aboriginal languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphosyntactic properties of Pama-Nyungan antipassives
    • 2.1Case
    • 2.2Verb marking
    • 2.3The antipassive object
    • 2.4Exclusions
  • 3.Data from Pama-Nyungan languages
    • 3.1Kalkatungu
    • 3.2Warrongo
    • 3.3Guugu Yimidhirr
    • 3.4Dyirbal
    • 3.5Pitta Pitta
    • 3.6Mabuiag
    • 3.7Kuku Yalanji
    • 3.8Summary
  • 4.Aspectual analysis
    • 4.1Parallels with imperfective aspect
    • 4.2Predicate-internal aspect
    • 4.3Modal approach to imperfectivity
  • 5.Technical implementation
  • 6.Alternative analyses
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.04den
References

References

Altshuler, Daniel
2014 A typology of partitive aspectual operators. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(3): 735–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1976 On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 1–23. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 1]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bani, Ephraim & Klokeid, Terry J.
1976 Ergative switching in Kala Lagau Langgus. In Languages of Cape York, Peter Sutton (ed.), 269–282. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1987 On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(2): 194–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
1976 On ergativity and the notion of subject. Lingua 39: 281–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 Case Marking in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
1978 From semantic to syntactic anti-passive in Kalkatungu. Oceanic Linguistics 17(2): 163–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979a A Kalkatungu Grammar. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1979b Pitta Pitta. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 1, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 183–242. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
1982 The absolutive: Its scope in English and Kalkatungu. In Syntax and Semantics: Studies in Transitivity, Paul L. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 71–94. New York NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 Australian Aboriginal Grammar. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Blight, Ralph
2004 Head Movement, Passive and Antipassive in English. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire & Atkinson, Quentin
2012 Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language 88(4): 817–845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A.
2004 Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Ergativity and grammatical relations in Kalaw Lagaw Ya (Saibai dialect). Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1994 A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul L. Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose
2008 Property-type objects and modal embedding. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 92–106. Oslo: ILOS.Google Scholar
del Prete, Fabio
2013 Imperfectivity and habituality in Italian. In Genericity, Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio del Prete (eds), 222–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Denniss, Jessica
2007 Antipassives in Yukulta. In University of Queensland Working Papers in Linguistics 1, Rob Pensalfini & Andreas Jäger (eds). Brisbane: University of Queensland. https://​www​.academia​.edu​/32469567​/University​_of​_Queensland​_Working​_Papers​_in​_Linguistics> (6 August 2020).
2017 The meaning of antipassive: Evidence from Australian languages. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 39. Crossref (6 August 2020).
Deo, Ashwini
2009 Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 475–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972 The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 A Grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 Wargamay. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 2, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 1–143. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1983 Nyawaygi. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 3, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 430–525. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo
2016 The semantic ingredients of imperfectivity in progressives, habituals and counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 24: 353–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van ValinJr., Robert D.
1985 Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 282–364. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1994 The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Syntax, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2006 Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2010 On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18(1): 79–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John
1979 Guugu Yimidhirr. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 1, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 26–180. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1976 Antipassivisation: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul L. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H.
1985 The analog of the passive transformation in ergative-type languages. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds), 176–191. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1983 Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 3, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 190–304. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1998 More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 92–110. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2002 The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Ms, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
2004 Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The Syntax of Time, Jaqueline Guéron & Jaqueline Lecarme (eds), 389–423. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 On the plurality of verbs. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds), 269–300. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Modals and Conditionals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1986 Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Individualtermen, Aspektklassen. PhD dissertation, University of Munich.Google Scholar
1989 Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Bentham & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolsci (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1998 The origins of telicity. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred
1992 The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2008 Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 55–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Split ergativity based on nominal type. Lingua 148: 183–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D.
1996 Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
1997 Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 5(1): 1–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Timothy
2015 Productivity and Reuse in Language: A Theory of Linguistic Computation and Storage. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terrance
1990 Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena, Testelets, Yakov & Yanovich, Igor
2012 The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: Genitive of negation and genitive of intensionality. Oslo Studies in Language 4(1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patz, Elisabeth
1991 Djabugay. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 4, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 244–347. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
2002 A Grammar of the Kuku Yalanji Language of North Queensland. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2006 Productivity. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 537–556. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013 Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/108 (6 July 2019).
2017 Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986 Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–558.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2004 Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2018 Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Language and Linguistics Compass. 12(6): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2012 Pluractional posing as progressive: A construction between lexical and grammatical aspect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32(1): 7–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane
1991 Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, Angela
1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988 Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 595–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 A Grammar of Warrongo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle
1998 Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle & McNally, Louise
2005 On the property analysis of opaque complements. Lingua 115: 885–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 Verbs and times. Philosophical Review LXVI: 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharram, Douglas
2003 On the Interpretation of (Un)certain Indefinites in Inuktitut and Related Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Thomas Ede
1993 On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1: 149–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.