Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 97–148

Chapter 4
Aspect and modality in Pama-Nyungan antipassives

| University of Toronto
I present data from Pama-Nyungan languages that display aspectual and modal readings in the antipassive construction, and propose that antipassives contain a predicate-internal aspectual morpheme that derives an atelic predicate. Taking a modal approach to aspect unifies the aspectual and modal readings. I detail the striking resemblance between the set of interpretations attested in antipassives and imperfectives more generally, and show how the compositional analysis I propose is able to provide insight into unexpected volitional and “total effect” readings.
Keywords: antipassives, imperfectives, telicity, modality, Australian Aboriginal languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphosyntactic properties of Pama-Nyungan antipassives
    • 2.1Case
    • 2.2Verb marking
    • 2.3The antipassive object
    • 2.4Exclusions
  • 3.Data from Pama-Nyungan languages
    • 3.1Kalkatungu
    • 3.2Warrongo
    • 3.3Guugu Yimidhirr
    • 3.4Dyirbal
    • 3.5Pitta Pitta
    • 3.6Mabuiag
    • 3.7Kuku Yalanji
    • 3.8Summary
  • 4.Aspectual analysis
    • 4.1Parallels with imperfective aspect
    • 4.2Predicate-internal aspect
    • 4.3Modal approach to imperfectivity
  • 5.Technical implementation
  • 6.Alternative analyses
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.04den
References (79)
References
Altshuler, Daniel. 2014. A typology of partitive aspectual operators. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(3): 735–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1976. On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 1–23. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 1]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bani, Ephraim & Klokeid, Terry J. 1976. Ergative switching in Kala Lagau Langgus. In Languages of Cape York, Peter Sutton (ed.), 269–282. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(2): 194–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1976. On ergativity and the notion of subject. Lingua 39: 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. Case Marking in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
1978. From semantic to syntactic anti-passive in Kalkatungu. Oceanic Linguistics 17(2): 163–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979a. A Kalkatungu Grammar. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1979b. Pitta Pitta. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 1, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 183–242. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
1982. The absolutive: Its scope in English and Kalkatungu. In Syntax and Semantics: Studies in Transitivity, Paul L. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 71–94. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Australian Aboriginal Grammar. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Blight, Ralph. 2004. Head Movement, Passive and Antipassive in English. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire & Atkinson, Quentin. 2012. Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language 88(4): 817–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Ergativity and grammatical relations in Kalaw Lagaw Ya (Saibai dialect). Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul L. Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2008. Property-type objects and modal embedding. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 92–106. Oslo: ILOS.Google Scholar
del Prete, Fabio. 2013. Imperfectivity and habituality in Italian. In Genericity, Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio del Prete (eds), 222–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Denniss, Jessica. 2007. Antipassives in Yukulta. In University of Queensland Working Papers in Linguistics 1, Rob Pensalfini & Andreas Jäger (eds). Brisbane: University of Queensland. <[URL]> (6 August 2020).
. 2017. The meaning of antipassive: Evidence from Australian languages. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 39. DOI logo (6 August 2020).
Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 475–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. A Grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. Wargamay. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 2, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 1–143. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1983. Nyawaygi. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 3, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 430–525. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2016. The semantic ingredients of imperfectivity in progressives, habituals and counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 24: 353–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van ValinJr., Robert D. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 282–364. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1994. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Syntax, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18(1): 79–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John. 1979. Guugu Yimidhirr. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 1, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 26–180. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivisation: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul L. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. 1985. The analog of the passive transformation in ergative-type languages. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds), 176–191. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Keen, Sandra. 1983. Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 3, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 190–304. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 92–110. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
. 2002. The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Ms, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
. 2004. Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The Syntax of Time, Jaqueline Guéron & Jaqueline Lecarme (eds), 389–423. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. On the plurality of verbs. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds), 269–300. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Individualtermen, Aspektklassen. PhD dissertation, University of Munich.Google Scholar
. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Bentham & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolsci (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 55–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Split ergativity based on nominal type. Lingua 148: 183–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 1997. Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 5(1): 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Timothy. 2015. Productivity and Reuse in Language: A Theory of Linguistic Computation and Storage. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terrance. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena, Testelets, Yakov & Yanovich, Igor. 2012. The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: Genitive of negation and genitive of intensionality. Oslo Studies in Language 4(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patz, Elisabeth. 1991. Djabugay. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 4, R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 244–347. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 2002. A Grammar of the Kuku Yalanji Language of North Queensland. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2006. Productivity. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 537–556. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (6 July 2019).
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–558.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea. 2018. Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Language and Linguistics Compass. 12(6): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2012. Pluractional posing as progressive: A construction between lexical and grammatical aspect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32(1): 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 1997. The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1988. Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 595–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A Grammar of Warrongo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle & McNally, Louise. 2005. On the property analysis of opaque complements. Lingua 115: 885–914. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review LXVI: 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wharram, Douglas. 2003. On the Interpretation of (Un)certain Indefinites in Inuktitut and Related Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Thomas Ede. 1993. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1: 149–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Claire Bowern
2023. The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages, DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.