Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 315–348

Chapter 10
Explaining the antipassive-causative syncretism in Mocoví (Guaycuruan)

| The University of Texas at Austin
| Universidad de Sonora
Among the polyfunctional valency markers, an antipassive-causative marker is a rather typologically unusual grammatical feature. This paper tries to explain the antipassive-causative syncretism in Mocoví, a Guaycuruan language spoken in northeastern Argentina, by examining the synchronic functions and the diachronic formation of the valency modifier -aɢan. We propose that both -aɢan antipassive and causative concentrate on the subject activity and involve the backgrounding of a core argument. These two functions, which are traceable to the formation of -aɢan from the state/change-of-state nominalizer -aɢa and the transitive verbalizer -n, work in tandem with the syntactic constraint of having only two core arguments per derived and non-derived transitive clauses, which crucially allows for the -aɢan reanalysis from causative to antipassive.
Keywords: syncretism, antipassive, causative, origin, evolution, Mocoví
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic family and typological profile of Mocoví
    • 2.1Guaycuruan family and Mocoví data
    • 2.2Nominal and verbal phrases
      • 2.2.1Nouns and nominal phrases
      • 2.2.2Transitivity and core arguments
      • 2.2.3Bound person forms and transitivity
  • 3.The synchrony of -aɢan
    • 3.1The -aɢan antipassive
    • 3.2The -aɢan causative
    • 3.3The -aɢan-aɢan combination: Antipassive + causative
    • 3.4Other intransitive causativizers: -aɢat and -aɢat-it
  • 4.The -aɢan formation and its evolution
    • 4.1The nominalizer -aɢa
    • 4.2The verbalizer -n and its verbal source
    • 4.3The -aɢan evolutionary scenario
  • 5.The origin of causative and antipassive markers beyond Mocoví
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations and symbols
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.10jua
References (46)
References
Beavers, John, Everdell, Michael, Jerro, Kyle, Kauhanen, Henri, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, LeBovidge, Elise & Nichols, Stephen. 2017. Two types of states: A cross-linguistic study of change-of-state verb roots. Paper presented at 91st Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 5–8 January, Austin, Texas.
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2020. The Roots of Verbal Meaning. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckwalter, Alberto. 1995. Vocabulario Mocovi. Elkhart: Mennonite Board of Missions.Google Scholar
Carpio, María Belén. 2012. Fonología y morfosintaxis de la lengua hablada por grupos tobas en el oeste de Formosa (Argentina). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Carrió, Cintia. 2009. Mirada generatica a la lengua mocoví (familia Guaycurú). Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Alternancias verbales en mocoví (familia guaycurú, Argentina). Linguística 31(2): 9–26.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Construcciones causativas y anticausativas en Mocoví. LIAMES 15(1): 69–89.Google Scholar
Censabella, Marisa. 2005. Nominalización deverbativa en toba. Anclajes 9: 189–211.Google Scholar
. 2008. Derivación causativa en toba. In Studies in Voice and Transitivity, Zarina Estrada-Fernández, Soren Wichmann, Claudine Chamoreau & Albert Álvarez-González (eds), 103–123. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Ceria, Verónica G. & Sandalo, Filomena. 1995. A preliminary reconstruction of proto-Waikurúan with special reference to pronominals and demonstratives. Anthropological Linguistics 37(2): 169–191.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann M. 1987. Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro Narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice. Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm, 29 August-1 September.
. 2015. Valency properties of Mandinka verbs. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook, Vol. 1, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 221–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–79. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Alain. 2006. Los guaykurú. Suplemento Antropológico 41(22): 7–132.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1996. West Greenlandic half-transitive affixes in a diachronic perspective. In Cultural and Social Research in Greenland 95/96. Essays in Honour of Robert Petersen, Birgitte Jacobsen (ed.), 34–44. Nuuk: Ilisimatusarfik/Atuakkiorfik.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, Jacobson, Steven & Kaplan, Lawrence. 2010. Comparative Eskimo Dictionary, with Aleut Cognates. Fairbanks AK: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
González, Raúl Eduardo. 2015. Estudio fonológico y morfosintáctico de la lengua toba hablada en el este de la provincia de Formosa (Argentina). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Grondona, Verónica María. 1998. A Grammar of Mocovi. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gualdieri, Cecilia Beatriz. 1998. Mocovi (guaicuru): Fonologia e morfossintaxe. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Languages across Boundaries. Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 197–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juárez, Cristian. 2017. Types of direct causativization in Mocoví (Guaycuruan, Argentina). Paper presented at the Workshop on American Indigenous Languages (WAIL), 12–13 May, Santa Barbara CA.
Juárez, Cristian & Álvarez González, Albert. 2017. The antipassive marking in Mocoví: Forms and functions. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives [Typological Sudies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez González & Ía Navarro (eds), 227–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2021. The multifaceted nature of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 1993. Transitivity increase in Athabaskan languages. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittïla, Seppo. 2002. Transitivity. Towards a comprehensive typology. Turku: Abo Akademis Trickery.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2016. “Ambivalent voice”: Markedness effects in valency change. In Transitivity and Valency Alternations. Studies on Japanese and Beyond, Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds), 389–422. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Markedness effects in applicative formation. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives [Typological Sudies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez González & Ía Navarro (eds), 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 235–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Beyond the core: Typological variation in the identification of participants. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(4): 445–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandalo, Maria Filomena. 1995. A Grammar of Kadiwéu. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48] Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1991. Causatives and universal grammar: An alternative interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society 89(1): 65–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Causatives and Causation. A Universal-Typological Perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2015. Valency and argument structure. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Vol. 25, James D. Wright (ed.), 1–6. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra. 1997. Discourse motivations for the core-oblique distinction as a language universal. In Directions in Functional Linguistics, [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Alejandra. 2001. Pilagá Grammar (Guaykuruan Family, Argentina). PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viegas Barros, J. Pedro. 2013. Proto-Guaicurú. Una reconstrucción fonológica, léxica y morfológica. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 1997. Functional analysis of akatek voice constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 63(4): 439–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.