Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 175–198

Olfactory, gustatory and tactile perception in Beja (North-Cushitic)

| Llacan (UMR 8135, CNRS, INALCO, Université Sorbonne Paris-Cité)
| Sudan University of Science and Technology (SUST, Khartoum, Sudan) and Omdurman Ahlia University (OAU, Omdurman, Sudan) | Omdurman Ahlia University (OAU, Omdurman, Sudan)
This chapter studies the perception words associated with the so-called “lower senses” (olfaction, gustatory and tactile perceptions) in Beja, a Cushitic language spoken mainly in Sudan, from three different perspectives. The first one concerns the organization of the related lexicon from the point of view of word categories, and their semantic aspects along a positive / negative and more intense / less intense continuum. Numerically, it shows a prevalence of the verb category over nouns and adjectives, and a more varied lexicon for smell, than for taste and touch. The second one provides a study of the syntactic constructions of perception words. It shows a prevalence of source-oriented constructions except in the tactile domain. The third one deals with the metaphorical extensions of the perception words for each sensory modality. The last section discusses the Beja findings in a broader comparative and typological perspective.
Keywords: perception, semantics, syntax, metaphor, Beja
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some basic aspects of Beja morphosyntax
  • 3Olfaction
    • 3.1Organization of the lexicon
    • 3.2Syntactic constructions
    • 3.3Metaphors
  • 4Taste
    • 4.1Organization of the lexicon
    • 4.2Syntactic constructions
    • 4.3Metaphors
  • 5.Touch
    • 5.1Organization of the lexicon
    • 5.2Syntactic constructions
    • 5.3Metaphors
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.06van
References (39)
References
Aschmann, Herman. 1946. Totonac categories of smell. Tlalocan 2: 187–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
‘Awn Al-Sharif Qasim. 2002. Qāmūs al-lahja al-ʕarabiyya fī l-Sūdān. (Dictionary of the Arabic variety of Sudan). Khartoum: Al-Dar al-Sūdānijja lil-Kitab.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger & Longtau, Selbut R. 1995. Tarok ophresiology: An investigation into the Tarok terminology of odours. In Issues in African Languages and Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Kay Williamson [Special Issue of the Nigerian Language Studies], Nọlue Emenanjọ & Ozo-mekuri Ndimele (eds), 340–344. Aba: National Institute for Nigerian Languages.Google Scholar
Boisson, Claude. 1997. La dnomination des odeurs: Variations et rgularits linguistiques. Intellectica 24(1): 29–49.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1988[1949]. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages: A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Majid, Asifa. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses & Society 6(1): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Chebanne, Andy M. 2000. Dictionnaire français-setswana, setswana-français. Mogoditshane (Botswana) & Gaborone: Tasalls Publishing & Books.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Radboud University. <[URL]> (3 September 2020).
Dingemanse, Mark & Majid, Asifa. 2012. The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012), Inoue Miyako, David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper (eds), 300–305. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Hulstaert, Gustaaf. 1957. Dictionnaire lomongo-franais. Tervuren: Musée Royal du Congo Belge (MRCB).Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 1999. Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 175], Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juvonen, Pavi & Nikunlassi, Ahti. 2015. Temperature adjectives in Finnish. In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107], Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (ed.), 491–536. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (ed.). 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2010. A note on an asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language, Susanne Fuchs, Phil Hoole, Christine Mooshammer & Marzena Żygis (eds), 235–245. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kryvenko, Anna. 2015. In the warmth of the Ukrainian temperature domain. In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107], Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (ed.), 300–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Amy Pei-Jung. 2015. Lexical categories and conceptualization of olfaction in Amis. Language and Cognition 7(3): 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Majid, Asifa. 2014. Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language 29(4): 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Levinson, Stephen C. 2008. Language does provide support for basic tastes [Commentary on A study of the science of taste: On the origins and influence of the core ideas by Robert P. Erickson]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(1): 86–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Senft, Gunter & Levinson, Stephen C. 2007. The language of olfaction. In Field Manual Volume 10, Asifa Majid (ed.), 36–41. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Mattiola, Simone. 2017. The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue et Linguaggio 16(1): 119–146.Google Scholar
Myers, Charles S. 1904. The taste-names of primitive peoples. British Journal of Psychology 1(2): 117–126.Google Scholar
Rasulić, Katarina. 2015. What's hot and what's not hot in English and Serbian. A contrastive view on the polysemy of temperature adjectives. In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107], Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (ed.), 245–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, Leo. 1895. Wörterbuch der Beḍawiye-Sprache. Wien: Kaiserische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Roper, E. M. 1928. “TuBeḍawiɛ”. An Elementary Handbook for the Use of Sudan Government Officials. Herford, Herts: Stephen Austin & Sons.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette. 2019. The ethno-linguistic relationship between smelling and kissing. A Southeast Asian case study. Oceanic Linguistics 58(1): 92–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segerer, Guillaume & Flavier, Sbastien. 2011-2020. RefLex: Reference Lexicon of Africa, Version 1.1. <[URL]> (1 April 2018).
Siahaan, Poppy. 2015. Why is it not cool? Temperature terms in Indonesian. In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107], Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (ed.), 666–699. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2004. Haptische, visuelle und olfaktorische Sprachen: Westnilotische Wahrnehmungen. Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-online. <[URL]> (1 October 2017).
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2007. Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory, Andrea Sans (ed.), 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thanassoula, Marilena. 2012. The perception verbs in Lussese (Bantu J10): A matter of experience. In Language Documentation and Description, Vol. 10: Special issue on Humanities of the Lesser-known: New Directions in the Description, Documentation and Typology of Endangered Languages and Musics, Jan-Olof Svantesson, Niclas Burenhult, Arthur Holmer, Anastasia Karlsson & Håkan Lundström (eds), 307–328. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Treis, Yvonne. 2010. Perception verbs and taste adjectives in Kambaata and beyond. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 21: 313–346.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen. 1957. Principles of Semantics. Glasgow: Jackson.Google Scholar
van Beek, Walter E.A. 1992. The dirty smith: Smell as a social frontier among the Kapsiki / Higi of north Cameroon and north-eastern Nigeria. Africa 62(1): 38–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2014. The Beja Corpus. In The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic, Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). <
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
> (1 October 2017).Google Scholar
. 2017. Le bedja. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2018. The Beja corpus. In The CorTypo Corpus, Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). <[URL]> (1 October 2017).Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina, de Valk, Josje M., Huisman, John L. A. & Majid, Asifa. 2017. Hot and cold smells: Odor-temperature associations across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology 8(1373): 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar