Part of
The Typology of Physical Qualities
Edited by Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova and Daria Ryzhova
[Typological Studies in Language 133] 2022
► pp. 128
References (89)
References
Ameka, F. K. & Levinson, S. C. (eds). 2007. The typology and semantics of locative predication: Posturals, positionals and other beasts [Special Issue]. Linguistics 45(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apresjan, Ju. 1974. Leksičeskaja semantika [Lexical Semantics]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 2000. Systematic Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. & Plungian, V. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., Bernardi, R. & Zamparelli, R. 2014. Frege in Space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technologies 9: 5–110.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. 1967. Some semantic universals of German adjectival. Foundations of Language 3(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. & Lang, E. 1989. Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britsyn, V. M., Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T. I. & Javorska, G. M. (eds). 2009. Koncept BOL’ v tipologičeskom osveščenii [The Concept of PAIN in a Typological Perspective]. Kiev: Dmitri Burago’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. & Hilbert, D. (eds). 1997. Readings on Color. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: an Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, M. & Wälchli, B. (eds). 2007. Parallel Texts. Using Translational Equivalents in Linguistic Typology. Theme Issue. Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung (STUF) 60(2).Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. & Majid, A. 2012. The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (eds), 300–305. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Driagina-Hasko, V. & Perelmutter, R. (eds). 2010. New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion [Studies in Language Companion Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & Wilkins, D. P. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, vol. 280: 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, A. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gage, J. 1999. Colour and Meaning. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Th. & Polis, S. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C. 2012. Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3): 711–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. L. & Maffi, L. (eds). 1997. Color Categories in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, M. Tomasello (ed), 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kashkin, E. V. 2010. Semantika glagolov razdelenija ob’’ekta na časti v èrzjanskom i komi-zyrjanskom jazykax (prjamye i perenosnye upotreblenija) [Semantics of verbs of cutting and breaking in Erzya and Komi-Zyryan (basic and derived meanings)]. Diploma paper, Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. E. 1998. Does intragenetic typology make sense? In Sprache in Raum und Zeit: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenshaft, W. Boeder, Ch. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner & W. Wildgen (eds), 61–68. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2009. In defence of intragenetic typology: evidence from clause coordination in Daghestanian languages. In Eighth Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology. Abstracts. <[URL]> (26 March 2021).
Koch, P. 2008. Cognitive onomasiology and lexical change: around the eye. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 107–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A. & Narasimhan, B. (eds). 2012. Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (ed). 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Divjak, D. & Rakhilina, E. 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. Driagina-Hasko & R. Perelmutter (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. & Rakhilina, E. V. 1999. S samymi teplymi čuvstvami (po gorjačim sledam Stokgol’mskoj èkspedicii) [With warmest regards (hot on the heels of the field trip to Stockholm)]. In Tipologija i teorija jazyka. Ot opisanija k ob’’jasneniju. K 60-letiju A. E. Kibrika [Typology and Linguistic Theory. From Description to Explanation. For the 60th Birthday of A. E. Kibrik], E. V. Rakhilina & Ya. G. Testelets (eds), 462–487. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. & Rakhilina, E. 2006. «Some like it hot»: on semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(2): 253–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruglyakova, V. A. 2010. Semantika glagolov vraščenija v tipologičeskoj perspektive [Semantics of rotation verbs in a typological perspective]. Ph.D. dissertation, Russian State University for the Humanities.
Lander, Yu., Maisak, T. & Rakhilina, E. 2012. Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (eds), 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, E. 2002. Spatial dimension terms. In Language Typology and Language Universals, M. Haspelmath & E. König (eds), 1251–1275. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. & Majid, A. 2014. Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language 29: 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luchina, E. S., Reznikova, T. I. & Stenin, I. A. 2013. Atributivy kak istočnik grammatikalizacii: ‘prjamoj’ i ‘rovnyj’ v russkom, nemeckom i finskom jazykah [Attributives as a source for grammaticalization: ‘straight’ and ‘even’ in Russin, German and Finnish]. In Tipología léxica, R. Guzmán Tirado & I. Votyakova (eds), 203–209. Granada: Jizo Ediciones.Google Scholar
Luchina, E. S. & Nanij, L. O. 2016. Puti grammatikalizacii leksem so značeniem ‘prjamoj’ [‘Straight’ and its synonyms: paths of grammaticalization in the attributive lexeme]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 12(1): 574–587.Google Scholar
MacLaury, R. E. 1997. Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
MacLaury, R. E., Paramei, G. V. & Dedrick, D. (eds). 2007. Anthropology of Color: Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maisak, T. A. & Rakhilina, E. V. (eds). 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of AQUA-Motion: a Lexical Typology]. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Majid, A. 2015. Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, J. R. Taylor (ed), 364–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2021. Human Olfaction at the Intersection of Language, Culture, and Biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25(2): 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. & Bowerman, M. (eds). 2007. Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. & Levinson, S. C. 2007. The language of vision I: colour. In Field Manual Volume 10, A. Majid (ed), 22–25. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
(eds). 2011. The senses in language and culture [Special Issue]. The Senses & Society 6(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Senft, G. & Levinson, S. C. 2007. The language of olfaction. In Field Manual Volume 10, A. Majid (ed), 36–41. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Majid, A., Gullberg, M., van Staden, M. & Bowerman, M. 2007. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. (ed). 1998. The Linguistics of Giving [Studies in Typological Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed). 2002. The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Studies in Typological Linguistics 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed). 2009. The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking [Studies in Typological Linguistics 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In An Invitation to Cognitive Science (Second Edition). Volume 1: Language, L. Gleitman & M. Liberman (eds), 311–360. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y. & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3): 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In Metonymy in Language and Thought [Human Cognitive Processing 4], K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds), 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. 2000. Kognitivnyj analiz predmentyx imen: semantika i sočetaemost’ [Cognitive Analysis of Concrete Nouns: Semantics and Combinability]. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
2007. Tipy metaforičeskix upotreblenij glagolov plavanija [Types of metaphorical uses of aqua-motion verbs]. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of AQUA-Motion: a Lexical Typology], T. A. Maisak & E. V. Rakhilina (eds), 76–105. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. 2010. Verbs of rotation in Russian and Polish. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. Driagina-Hasko & R. Perelmutter (eds), 291–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Lemmens, M. 2003. Rusistika i tipologiya: leksičeskaja semantika glagolov so značeniem ‘sidet’’ v russkom i niderlandskom [Russian studies and typology: lexical semantics of verbs meaning ‘to sit’ in Russian and Dutch]. Russian Linguistics 27(3): 313–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Reznikova, T. I. 2016. A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 95–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T. I., Ryzhova, D. A. (eds). 2020. Tipologija glagolov padenija [Typology of verbs of falling] [Special issue]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 16(1).Google Scholar
Reznikova, T., Rakhilina, E. & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3): 421–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryzhova, D., Rakhilina, E. & Kholkina, L. 2019. Approaching perceptual qualities: the case of heavy. In Perception Metaphors, L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (eds), 185–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. & Sicoli, M. A. 2011. The thickness of pitch: Crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. The Senses and Society 6(1): 96–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L. & Majid, A. (eds). 2019. Perception Metaphors. 185–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, M. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 342–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å. 1984. The verbs of perception: a typological study. In Explanations for Language Universals, B. Butterworth, B. Comrie & Ö. Dahl (eds), 123–162. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Riding, driving and traveling: Swedish verbs describing motion in a vehicle in crosslinguistic perspective. In Resourceful Language Technology: Festschrift in Honor of Anna Sågvall Hein, J. Nivre, M. Dahllöf & B. Megyesi (eds), 173–201. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
. 2013. Posture verbs: A multilingual contrastive study. Languages in Contrast 13(2): 139–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waag, A. 1901. Bedeutungsentwicklung unseres Wortschatzes. Auf Grund von Hermann Pauls “Deutschem Wörterbuch” in den Haupterscheinungen dargestellt. Lahr i.B.: M. Schauenburg.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B. & Cysouw, M. 2012. Lexical Typology through Similarity Semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3): 671–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1985. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Emotions across Languages and Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Shape in Grammar revisited. Studies in Language 30(1): 115–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Bodies and their parts: an NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences 29: 14–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. P. 1996. Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, M. Durie & M. Ross (eds), 264–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zalizniak, Anna A. 2008. A Catalogue of Semantic Shifts: towards a Typology of Semantic Derivation. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 217–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zalizniak, Anna A., Bulakh, M., Ganenkov, D., Gruntov, I., Maisak, T. & Russo, M. 2012. The Catalogue of Semantic Shifts as a Database for Semantic Typology. Linguistics, 50(3): 633–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar