The Grammar of Space
| San José State University
Paperback – Other edition available
ISBN 9789027229120 (Eur)
ISBN 9781556194153 (USA)
A cross-linguistic study of grammatical morphemes expressing spatial relationships that discusses the relationship between the way human beings experience space and the way it is encoded grammatically in language.
The discussion of the similarities and differences among languages in the encoding and expression of spatial relations centers around the emergence and evolution of spatial grams, and the semantic and morphosyntactic characteristics of two types of spatial grams. The author bases her observations on the study of data from 26 genetically unrelated and randomly selected languages.
It is shown that languages are similar in the way spatial grams emerge and evolve, and also in the way specific types of spatial grams are used to express not only spatial but also temporal and other non-spatial relations. Motivation for these similarities may lie in the way we, as human beings, experience the world, which is constrained by our physical configuration and neurophysiological apparatus, as well as our individual cultures.
[Typological Studies in Language, 25] 1994. xiv, 290 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
xi
|
|
List of Abbreviations
|
xiii
|
|
The conceptual framework
|
1
|
|
General Methodology
|
41
|
|
The Evolution of Spatial Grams
|
61
|
|
The Front-Back Axis
|
123
|
|
Conclusion
|
203
|
|
Notes
|
213
|
|
Appendix A: The SpaceCats sample
|
223
|
|
Appendix B: Coding manual
|
225
|
|
Appendix C: Meaning component working definitions
|
235
|
|
Appendix D: Frequency of meaning components in the data base
|
245
|
|
Appendix E: Nominal sources of spatial grams
|
249
|
|
Bibliography
|
263
|
|
Language Index
|
279
|
|
Name Index
|
283
|
|
Subject Index
|
287
|
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In The Spatial Language of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 42],
No author info given
2015.
In Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 331],
No author info given
2018.
In Directional Particles in Cantonese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 9],
No author info given
2018.
In The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3],
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2015. Body, mind, and spirit: What makes up a person in Manambu.
Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Albertazzi, Liliana
2007.
In Cognitive Aspects of Bilingualism,
► pp. 63 ff.
Amfo, Nana Aba Appiah
2010. Noun phrase conjunction in Akan.
Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Atak, Ata & Gülsün Leyla Uzun
2019. Uzamsal Referans Çerçeveleri ve Türkçedeki Görünümleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme.
Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi ► pp. 69 ff.
Atintono, Samuel Awinkene
2012. Basic and extended uses of posture verbs in Gurenɛ.
CogniTextes :7
AURNAGUE, MICHEL
2011. Quittant tout, nous partîmes: quitter et partir à la lumière des changements de relation locative.
Journal of French Language Studies 21:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Aurnague, Michel, Maya Hickmann & Laure Vieu
2005.
In Agir dans l'espace,
► pp. 217 ff.
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit
2018.
In Nature, Metaphor, Culture [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 43 ff.
Barnabé, Aurélie
2013. De l’expérience kinesthésique à la structuration prépositionnelle du schème-image du chemin.
Corela :11-1
BARNABÉ, Aurélie
2015. Les prépositions évaluées par le prisme du paradigme cognitif : vers une lecture enactive.
Corela :13-2
Beckner, Clay & Joan Bybee
2009. A Usage-Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis.
Language Learning 59 ► pp. 27 ff.
Bertin, Thomas, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Les tunnels ont-ils des bouches ?.
SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 12013 ff.
Bowers, Jack & Laurent Romary
2016. Deep Encoding of Etymological Information in TEI.
Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative :Issue 10
Brenda, Maria
2017. A cognitive perspective on the semantics ofnear.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Casad, Eugene H.
2014.
In Non-Nuclear Cases,
► pp. 21 ff.
Cuyckens, Hubert
2007. REVIEWS - Tyler Andrea & Vyvyan Evans, The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xii+254..
Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 747 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space.
Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
Fagard, Benjamin
2019.
In The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 66],
► pp. 110 ff.
Fagard, Benjamin, José Pinto De Lima & Dejan Stosic
2019. Les prépositions complexes dans les langues romanes.
Revue Romane 54:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Fagard, Benjamin & Dejan Stosic
2012. Introduction générale : langue, espace, cognition.
Corela :HS-12
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry.
Constructions and Frames 10:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Groussier, Marie-Line
2001.
In Travaux de Diachronie 2,
► pp. 21 ff.
Guérin, Valérie
2014. In search of the origin ofnain Mavea.
Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 690 ff.
Heegård Petersen, Jan
2015. Kalasha texts – With introductory grammar.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47:sup1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hellberg, Staffan
2007. Polysemy Across Image Schemas: SwedishFRAM.
Studia Linguistica 61:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Hoffmann, Dorothea
2019. Restrictions on the Usage of Spatial Frames of Reference in Location and Orientation Descriptions: Evidence from Three Australian Languages.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003.
In Grammaticalization,
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2017.
In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59],
► pp. 13 ff.
Kabata, Kaori
2014.
In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156],
► pp. 171 ff.
Kadenge, Maxwell & George Mavunga
2009. Linguistic innovation during a national crisis: An analysis of selected Shona metaphors created during the Zimbabwe crisis.
South African Journal of African Languages 29:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Kadenge, Maxwell & George Mavunga
2011. The Zimbabwe crisis as captured in Shona metaphor.
Journal of African Cultural Studies 23:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Kemmerer, David & Daniel Tranel
2000. A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION BETWEEN LINGUISTIC AND PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS.
Cognitive Neuropsychology 17:5 ► pp. 393 ff.
Kor Chahine, Irina
2007. О ВОЗМОЖНОМ ПУТИ ГРАММАТИКАЛИЗАЦИИ РУССКОГО взять.
Russian Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi
2017. Grammaire cognitive des prépositions : épistémologie et applications.
Corela :HS-22
Levinson, Stephen C.
1996. LANGUAGE AND SPACE.
Annual Review of Anthropology 25:1 ► pp. 353 ff.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003.
In Space in Language and Cognition,
Lü, Shanshan
2018. Two locative constructions in Caijia from the typological perspective of Asian languages.
Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 600 ff.
Majid, Asifa & Miriam van Staden
2015. Can Nomenclature for the Body be Explained by Embodiment Theories?.
Topics in Cognitive Science 7:4 ► pp. 570 ff.
Mheta, Gift
2017. A cognitive analysis of metaphor in Shona terminological dictionaries.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Miozzo, Michele, Simon Fischer-Baum & Jeffrey Postman
2008. Knowing where but not what: Impaired thematic roles and spatial language.
Cognitive Neuropsychology 25:6 ► pp. 853 ff.
Moore, Kevin Ezra
2014. The two-Mover hypothesis and the significance of “direction of motion” in temporal metaphors.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 375 ff.
MOORE, KEVIN EZRA
2017. Elaborating time in space: the structure and function of space–motion metaphors of time.
Language and Cognition 9:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2017.
In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],
► pp. 67 ff.
Pasch, Helma
2020.
In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12],
► pp. 54 ff.
Pollio, Howard R., Lance B. Fagan, Thomas R. Graves & Priscilla Levasseur
2005. The Semantics of Space: Experiential and Linguistic Aspects of Selected English Spatial Terms.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Provencio Garrigós, Herminia
2020.
In Changes in Meaning and Function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25],
► pp. 238 ff.
Rissman, Lilia & Asifa Majid
2019. Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:6 ► pp. 1850 ff.
Roby, Courtney Ann
2016.
In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174],
► pp. 209 ff.
Sinha, Chris & Tania Kuteva
1995. Distributed Spatial Semantics.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Sivonen, Jari
2017. The Finnish abstract motion constructionmennäV-mA-An[go V-inf-ill] ‘do something unwished’.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Song, Sooho
2018.
In Second Language Acquisition as a Mode-Switching Process,
► pp. 37 ff.
Spranger, Michael
2013.
In 2013 IEEE Third Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL),
► pp. 1 ff.
Spranger, Michael
2015.
In 2015 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob),
► pp. 196 ff.
Stolz, Thomas, Nataliya Levkovych & Aina Urdze
2017.
In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],
► pp. 207 ff.
Stosic, Dejan
2012. En passant par : une expression en voie de grammaticalisation ?.
Corela :HS-12
Stosic, Dejan & Benjamin Fagard
2019. Les prépositions complexes en français.
Revue Romane 54:1 ► pp. 8 ff.
Su, Hung-Kuan & Alvin Cheng-Hsien Chen
2019. Conceptualization of containment in Chinese.
Concentric 45:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Tenbrink, Thora & Werner Kuhn
2011.
In Spatial Information Theory [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6899],
► pp. 371 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001.
In Regularity in Semantic Change,
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans
2003.
In The Semantics of English Prepositions,
Vavula, Tatsiana
2011. Représentation idéographique des prépositions russes /v/ et /na/.
Corela :9-1
Verkerk, Annemarie
2017.
In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],
► pp. 1 ff.
Vermeulen, Karolien
2017. Save or Sack the City: The Fate of Jonah's Nineveh from a Spatial Perspective.
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 42:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Yang, Youwen
2011. A Cognitive Interpretation of Discourse Deixis.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1:2
Yap, Foong Ha & Winnie Oi-Wan Chor
2014.
In Modes of Modality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 149],
► pp. 219 ff.
Yu, Ning
2000. Figurative Uses of Finger and Palm in Chinese and English.
Metaphor and Symbol 15:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Zanchi, Chiara
2017.
In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],
► pp. 147 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 93034836