Voice and Inversion
Editor
Paperback – Other edition available
ISBN 9789027229182 (Eur)
ISBN 9781556194214 (USA)
This collection aims first to establish a structure-independent, language-independent definition of pragmatic voice, and more specifically then a universal functional definition of “inverse”. The grammar and pragmatic function of the four major voice constructions — direct-active, inverse, passive, antipassive — are surveyed using narrative texts from 14 languages: Koyukon (Athabascan), Plains Cree (Algonquian), Chepang (Tibeto-Burman), Squamish and Bella Coola (Salish), Sahaptin (Sahaptian), Kutenai (isolate), Surinam Carib (Carib), Spanish and Greek (Indo-European), Korean, Maasai (Nilotic), Cebuano and Karao (Philippine). The comparative quantified study of pragmatic voice functions tests the validity of a universal functional definition of voice and in particular of “inverse”. The cross-language comparison of grammatical structures that code the various voice functions then lays down the foundation for a non-trivial cross-language typology of “inverse”.
[Typological Studies in Language, 28] 1994. viii, 402 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Abbreviations | p. vii
-
I. Introduction
-
The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversionT. Givón | p. 3
-
II. Morphological inverses
-
Passive and inverse constructionsChad L. Thompson | p. 47
-
The discourse function of the Kutenei inverseMatthew S. Dryer | p. 65
-
Direct, inverse and passive in Northwest SahaptinNoel Rude | p. 101
-
The inverse in SquamishPeter Jacobs | p. 121
-
The de-transitive clauses in Bella Coola: Passive vs. InverseLinda B. Forrest | p. 147
-
The pragmatics of de-transitive voice in Spanish: From passive to inverse?Raquel Hidalgo Downing | p. 169
-
Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of SurinamSpike Gildea | p. 187
-
III. Word-order inverses
-
The pragmatics of Modern Greek voice: Active, inverse and passiveKaty Roland | p. 233
-
The pragmatics of voice in KoreanInhee Lee Kwak | p. 261
-
Active, inverse and passive in MaasaiDoris L. Payne, Mitsuyo Hamaya and Peter Jacobs | p. 283
-
The pragmatics of voice in a Philippine language: Actor-focus and goal-focus in Cebuano narrativeThomas E. Payne | p. 317
-
Voice and ergativity in KaraoSherri Brainard | p. 365
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Beck, David
Breivik, Leiv Egil
2022. On relative clauses and locative expressions in English existential sentences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 211 ff. 
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Hemmings, Charlotte
2021. Chapter 18. When an antipassive isn’t an antipassive anymore. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 579 ff. 
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
Janic, Katarzyna & Charlotte Hemmings
2021. Alignment shift as functional markedness reversal. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 299 ff. 
Kandylaki, Katerina Danae, Arne Nagels, Sarah Tune, Tilo Kircher, Richard Wiese, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Konnerth, Linda
Marttinen Larsson, Matti
Marttinen Larsson, Matti & Laura Álvarez López
Myhill, John
Nedashkivska Adams, Alla
Riesberg, Sonja, Maria Bardají i Farré, Kurt Malcher & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2022. Predicting voice choice in symmetrical voice languages. Studies in Language 46:2 ► pp. 453 ff. 
Srishti, Richa & Shahid Bhat
2014. Is Kashmiri passive really a passive?. In The Lexicon–Syntax Interface [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 209], ► pp. 149 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General