Topic continuity in Japanese

Hinds, John

doi:10.1075/tsl.3.02hin

Part of

Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study
T. Givón
[Typological Studies in Language 3] 1983
► pp. 43–

Topic continuity in Japanese

John Hinds

Published online: 1 January 1983

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.02hin

Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Ariel, Mira

1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Clancy, Patricia M.

1992. Referential strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Discourse Processes 15:4 ► pp. 441 ff.

Givón, T.

2017. The Story of Zero,

2017. Zero, pronouns and clause-chaining: Toward a diachronic understanding. Lingua 185 ► pp. 96 ff.

2018. On Understanding Grammar,

2020. Coherence,

Hwang, Heeju

2022. Choice of nominative and topic markers in Korean discourse. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology ► pp. 174702182211035 ff.

Jarbou, Samer Omar

2018. Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic. Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 57 ff.

Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi

2012. Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study. Research in Language 10:4 ► pp. 423 ff.

Kataoka, Kuniyoshi

2022. Affect in Japanese women’s letter writing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 427 ff.

Lam, Suet‐Ying & Heeju Hwang

2022. How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin. Cognitive Science 46:10

Lee, Hanjung

2006. Parallel Optimization in Case Systems: Evidence from Case Ellipsis in Korean*. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 69 ff.

2009. Quantitative Variation in Korean Case Ellipsis: Implications for Case Theory. In Differential Subject Marking [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 72], ► pp. 41 ff.

2010. Explaining variation in Korean case ellipsis: Economy versus iconicity. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19:4 ► pp. 291 ff.

2015. Case Particle Ellipsis. In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, ► pp. 196 ff.

2016. Usage probability and subject–object asymmetries in Korean case ellipsis: Experiments with subject case ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 52:1 ► pp. 70 ff.

Nariyama, Shigeko

2001. Argument Structure as Another Reference-tracking System with Reference to Ellipsis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 99 ff.

Ngo, Binh, Elsi Kaiser & Andrew Simpson

2019. Chapter 13. Effects of grammatical roles and parallelism on referential form production in Vietnamese spoken and written narratives. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Vietnamese Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 211], ► pp. 275 ff.

Sasaki, Miyuki

1991. An analysis of sentences with nonreferentialtherein spoken American English. <i>WORD</i> 42:2 ► pp. 157 ff.

Wienold, Götz

1990. Typological Aspects of Translating Literary Japanese into German, I. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

YAMASHITA, HIROKO

2002. Scrambled sentences in Japanese: Linguistic properties and motivations for production. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:4

[no author supplied]

2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344],

2020. Chapter 6. Discourse coherence. In Coherence, ► pp. 104 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.