Part of
Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language studyT. Givón
[Typological Studies in Language 3] 1983
► pp. 43–
T. Givón
[Typological Studies in Language 3] 1983
► pp. 43–
Topic continuity in Japanese
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Ariel, Mira
1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 3 ff. 
Clancy, Patricia M.
1992. Referential strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Discourse Processes 15:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
2017. Zero, pronouns and clause-chaining: Toward a diachronic understanding. Lingua 185 ► pp. 96 ff.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Hwang, Heeju
2023. Choice of nominative and topic markers in Korean discourse. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 76:4 ► pp. 905 ff.
Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018. Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic. Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012. Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study. Research in Language 10:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Kataoka, Kuniyoshi
2022. Affect in Japanese women’s letter writing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 427 ff.
Lam, Suet‐Ying & Heeju Hwang
2022. How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin. Cognitive Science 46:10
Lee, Hanjung
2006. Parallel Optimization in Case Systems: Evidence from Case Ellipsis in Korean*. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Lee, Hanjung
2009. Quantitative Variation in Korean Case Ellipsis: Implications for Case Theory. In Differential Subject Marking [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 72], ► pp. 41 ff.
Lee, Hanjung
2010. Explaining variation in Korean case ellipsis: Economy versus iconicity. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19:4 ► pp. 291 ff.
Lee, Hanjung
2015. Case Particle Ellipsis. In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, ► pp. 196 ff.
LEE, HANJUNG
2016. Usage probability and subject–object asymmetries in Korean case ellipsis: Experiments with subject case ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 52:1 ► pp. 70 ff.
Nariyama, Shigeko
2001. Argument Structure as Another Reference-tracking System with Reference to Ellipsis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Ngo, Binh, Elsi Kaiser & Andrew Simpson
2019. Chapter 13. Effects of grammatical roles and parallelism on referential form production in Vietnamese spoken and written narratives. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Vietnamese Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 211], ► pp. 275 ff.
Sasaki, Miyuki
1991. An analysis of sentences with nonreferentialtherein spoken American English. <i>WORD</i> 42:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Schnell, Stefan
2018. Whence subject-verb agreement? Investigating the role of topicality, accessibility, and frequency in Vera’a texts. Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 735 ff.
Wienold, Götz
1990. Typological Aspects of Translating Literary Japanese into German, I. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
YAMASHITA, HIROKO
2002. Scrambled sentences in Japanese: Linguistic properties and motivations for production. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:4
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.