Studies in Evidentiality
Editors
In a number of languages, the speaker must specify the evidence for every statement whether seen, or heard, or inferred from indirect evidence, or learnt from someone else. This grammatical category, referring to information source, is called ‘evidentiality’. Evidentiality systems differ in how complex they are: some distinguish just two terms (eyewitness and noneyewitness, or reported and non-reported), while others have six (or even more) terms. Evidentiality is a category in its own right, and not a subtype of epistemic or some other modality, or of tense-aspect. The introductory chapter sets out cross-linguistic parameters for studying evidentiality. It is followed by twelve chapters which deal with typologically different languages from various parts of the world: Shipibo-Conibo, Jarawara, Tariana and Myky from South America; West Greenlandic Eskimo; Western Apache and Eastern Pomo from North America; Qiang (Tibeto-Burman); Yukaghir (Siberian isolate); Turkic languages; languages of the Balkans; and Abkhaz (Northwest Caucasian). The final chapter summarises some of the recurrent patterns.
[Typological Studies in Language, 54] 2003. xiv, 349 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Contributors | p. vii
-
Preface | p. ix
-
Abbreviations | p. xi
-
1. Evidentiality in typological perspectiveAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald | pp. 1–31
-
2. Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a comparative overview of the category in PanoanPilar M. Valenzuela | pp. 33–61
-
3. Evidentiality in QiangRandy J. LaPolla | pp. 63–78
-
4. Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan)Willem J. de Reuse | pp. 79–100
-
5. Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languagesSally McLendon | pp. 101–129
-
6. Evidentiality in TarianaAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald | pp. 131–164
-
7. Evidentiality in JarawaraR.M.W. Dixon | pp. 165–187
-
8. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and AlbanianVictor A. Friedman | pp. 189–218
-
9. Evidentiality in YukaghirElena S. Maslova | pp. 219–235
-
10. Evidentiality in MỹkyRuth Monserrat and R.M.W. Dixon | pp. 237–241
-
11. Evidential category and evidential strategy in AbkhazViacheslav Chirikba | pp. 243–272
-
12. Evidentiality in TurkicLars Johanson | pp. 273–290
-
13. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered codingMichael Fortescue | pp. 291–306
-
14. EvidentialsBrian D. Joseph | pp. 307–327
-
Index of authors | pp. 329–332
-
Index of languages and language families | pp. 333–340
-
Index of subjects | pp. 341–347
“This book is a major publication in the rapidly expanding field of evidentiality studies. It will join the sequence of books like Chafe and Nichols (1986), Guentcheva (1996), and Johanson, L. and Utas, B. (2000) as an essential resource for linguists interested in evidentiality studies, and should certainly find itself on the shelves of university libraries. Its new contribution is that it attempts to introduce a typological framework within which the data from various languages can be fit. The individual chapters are rich in data and
language-specific interpretive analysis. It is recommended without reservation.”
language-specific interpretive analysis. It is recommended without reservation.”
Elena Bashir, The University of Chicago on Linguist List: Vol-14-1664, 2003.
“Much can be learned from this volume about how and why languages grammaticalize evidentiality.”
Augustinus Gianto, Pontifical Biblical Institute Rome, in Language 80(4)
“The volume is a welcome contribution to the study of evidentiality, and it offers many new and important insights. Its wealth of information is made readily accessible both by the introduction (Chapter 1) and a very detailed index that follows the laudable tradition of the series.”
Winfried Boeder, University of Oldenburg, in Studies in Language 31(2), 2007
“The main value of the volume is that it enriches our knowledge of the means of coding the speaker's attitude toward the information provided, be it with respect to the sources of knowledge or to the reality of the event. Given the fact that the present volume contains mostly studies of different languages, it constitutes a most useful companion for scholars studying speakers' attitudes toward the sources of their knowledge and toward the propositions they produce.”
Zygmunt Frajzyngier, University of Colorado, in Journal of Linguistics 41, 2005
Cited by (75)
Cited by 75 other publications
Gregersen, Sune
Kozlovsky, Dmitry Valentinovich & Svetlana Viktorovna Ivanova
Poliakova, Eva E.
Yakup, Abdurishid
2024. Modern Uyghur evidentials in interrogative sentences. Asian Languages and Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Bergqvist, Henrik & Karolina Grzech
Coşkun Kunduz, Aylin & Silvina Montrul
Felecan, Daiana
Infante Peña, Victoria Elizabeth
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
Tosun, Sümeyra & Luna Filipović
Barés-Gómez, C, M Fontaine & A Nepomuceno
Bourmayan, Anouch & Fumitake Ashino
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift & John Heritage
Estellés Arguedas, Maria
Hickey, Raymond
Kittilä, Seppo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2020. Evidentiality and humor in Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 302 ff.
Łukasiewicz, Elżbieta
Chernoklinov, Evgeny A.
Halverson, Colin Michael Egenberger
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
Bergqvist, Henrik
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality as stance. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 19 ff.
De Decker, Filip
De Decker, Filip
Kwon, Kyongjoon
Lutfullina, Gulnara, Veronika Sabitova, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
Lutfullina, Gulnara, Veronika Sabitova, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
Shin, Gi-Hyun
Aydın, Çağla
2017. Chapter 9. The relationship between language, memory and evidentiality. In Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 21], ► pp. 133 ff.
Filipović, Luna
Langacker, Ronald W.
2017. Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 13 ff.
Ahn, Mikyung
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pastore, Luigi & Sara Dellantonio
Poortvliet, Marjolein
Severi, Carlo
TOSUN, SÜMEYRA & JYOTSNA VAID
Wu, Haiping
2016. Modified resayings of reported speech in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Haßler, Gerda
Luo, Yongxian
2015. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Zhuang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Peterson, Tyler
2015. Grammatical evidentiality and the unprepared mind. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 314 ff.
Yang, Linxiu & Yu Tian
Yang, Linxiu & Yu Tian
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2014. On the development of Korean SAY evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions. Diachronica 31:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
Kostrova, Olga A
2014. Kinds of evidentiality in German complement clauses. In On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia [Studies in Language Companion Series, 164], ► pp. 311 ff.
Nordlund, Taru & Heli Pekkarinen
2014. Grammaticalisation of the Finnish stance adverbialmuka, ‘as if, supposedly, allegedly’. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 53 ff.
Suihkonen, Pirkko & Lindsay J. Whaley
2014. Introduction. In On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia [Studies in Language Companion Series, 164], ► pp. xi ff.
Weifeng, Han & Shi Dingxu
Zuczkowski, Andrzej
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni & Andrzej Zuczkowski
Grund, Peter J.
Rovai, Francesco
Yang, Linxiu
Yang, Linxiu
Yang, Linxiu
SU, QI, HELEN KAI-YUN CHEN & CHU-REN HUANG
Mimica, Jadran
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan, Hale Ögel-Balaban & İ. Ercan Alp
Paz, Alejandro
Bermúdez, Fernando
Hsieh, Chia-Ling
McCready, Elin
Speas, Peggy
McCready, Elin & Norry Ogata
Clift, Rebecca
van Gelderen, Elly, David K. Barnhart, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Edward J. Vajda, Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Anthony P. Grant
Kim, Mary Shin
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General