16. Coordination in Oceanic languages and Proto Oceanic

Claire Moyse-Faurie | LACITO-CNRS, Paris

John Lynch | University of the South Pacific

1.Introduction 1.1 Typological preliminaries 1.2 Existing reconstructions 2. Nominal coordination 2.1 Tight and loose coordination 2.2 Common NPs vs proper NPs coordination 3. Verb phrase and clausal coordination 3.1 Phrasal (NP/VP) and clausal coordination marked differently 3.2 Phrasal and clausal coordination marked identically 3.3 Nominal coordination differs from verbal and clausal coordination 4. Numeral and end of lists coordination 5. Coordination and comitative 6. Adverbial functions of coordinators 7. Discussion 7.1 Towards a typology of Oceanic coordination 7.2 The coordinator-to-TAM-marker shift in Western Oceanic 7.3 Proto Oceanic Coordinators 8. Conclusion

Published online: 29 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.23moy

Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

AnderBois, Scott

2012. Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions. Natural Language Semantics 20:4 ► pp. 349 ff.

Bril, Isabelle, Claire Moyse-Faurie & Joachim Sabel

2011. In Topics in Oceanic Morphosyntax,

Daniels, Don

2014. Complex coordination in diachrony. Diachronica 31:3 ► pp. 379 ff.

Keine, Stefan

2013. Deconstructing switch-reference. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31:3 ► pp. 767 ff.

Lee, Seung-Ah

2016. Verb Agreement in EnglishWh-Clefts: A Corpus-Based Study. English Studies 97:7 ► pp. 779 ff.

Otsuka, Yuko

2010. DP ellipsis in Tongan: is syntactic ergativity real?. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28:2 ► pp. 315 ff.

Weisser, Philipp

2016. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 93 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.