Part of
Up and down the Cline – The Nature of GrammaticalizationEdited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon
[Typological Studies in Language 59] 2004
► pp. 169–192
Edited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon
[Typological Studies in Language 59] 2004
► pp. 169–192
Conditionals and subjectification
Implications for a theory of semantic change
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
MÉLAC, ERIC
2022. The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 331 ff. 
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2022. ‘Wonder’ Nouns and the Development of a Mirative Constructional Network: An Exercise in Semiotic Diachronic Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
Disney, Steve
2016. Another Visit to BE Supposed to from a Diachronic Constructionist Perspective. English Studies 97:8 ► pp. 892 ff.
Verhulst, An & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. Root Modal Uses ofShould, Ought toandBe Supposed toin Present-Day English: From Patterns and Profiles to Proficiency Guidelines. English Studies 96:5 ► pp. 562 ff.
Colleman, Timothy & Dirk Noël
2014. Tracing the history of deontic NCI patterns in Dutch: A case of polysemy copying. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 213 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
Noël, Dirk
2008. The Nominative and Infinitive in Late Modern English. Journal of English Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 314 ff.
Moore, Colette
2007. The Spread of Grammaticalized Forms. Journal of English Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
Visconti, Jacqueline
2004. Regularity in Semantic Change. Journal of Pragmatics 36:4 ► pp. 821 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.