Part of
Up and down the Cline – The Nature of GrammaticalizationEdited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon
[Typological Studies in Language 59] 2004
► pp. 169–192
Edited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon
[Typological Studies in Language 59] 2004
► pp. 169–192
Conditionals and subjectification
Implications for a theory of semantic change
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Colleman, Timothy & Dirk Noël
2014. Tracing the history of deontic NCI patterns in Dutch: A case of polysemy copying. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 213 ff. 
Disney, Steve
2016. Another Visit to BE Supposed to from a Diachronic Constructionist Perspective. English Studies 97:8 ► pp. 892 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
Moore, Colette
2007. The Spread of Grammaticalized Forms. Journal of English Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
MÉLAC, ERIC
2022. The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2022. ‘Wonder’ Nouns and the Development of a Mirative Constructional Network: An Exercise in Semiotic Diachronic Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
Verhulst, An & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. Root Modal Uses ofShould, Ought toandBe Supposed toin Present-Day English: From Patterns and Profiles to Proficiency Guidelines. English Studies 96:5 ► pp. 562 ff.
Visconti, Jacqueline
2004. Regularity in Semantic Change. Journal of Pragmatics 36:4 ► pp. 821 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.